Listen to the article
Southern Yemen Faction Claims Control, Seeks US Partnership Against Iran-Backed Groups
Yemen’s Southern Transitional Council (STC) claims it now controls all eight southern governorates and is positioning itself as a potential frontline partner for the United States against Iran-backed Houthis and other militant groups in the region.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Ahmed Atef, the STC’s representative to the United States and United Nations, expressed hope for expanded cooperation with Washington across military, diplomatic, and economic fronts.
“All kinds of support are welcome,” Atef stated. “President Trump is very courageous and very strong, and we are really looking forward to his support.”
The STC has emerged as the dominant power in southern Yemen with significant backing from the United Arab Emirates. Formed in April 2017, the council unites factions seeking to reestablish an independent South Yemen—reviving the state that existed from 1967 until unification in 1990.
The group’s recent territorial advances have drawn international concern. Last week, the head of Yemen’s internationally recognized government called on the STC to withdraw from territories they captured in southeastern Yemen. UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned on Wednesday that Yemen faces “a dangerous new escalation” following STC advances in the eastern governorates of Hadramawt and al-Mahra.
Guterres cautioned that such unilateral actions risk “deepening divisions, hardening positions and accelerating fragmentation, with potential spillover effects on regional security,” including the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Horn of Africa.
Bridget Toomey, a researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital that U.S. support for southern secession would contradict stated American policy, which recognizes one unified Yemen. However, she noted that backing the STC as a counterterrorism partner “would not necessarily be at odds with the government,” particularly since the STC and its leadership are already part of Yemen’s governing framework.
Yemen’s Fractured Landscape
Yemen’s protracted civil war has effectively split the country. In the north, Iran-backed Houthi rebels control the capital Sanaa and much of western Yemen. In the south, STC-aligned forces dominate Aden—the temporary capital—and a belt of inland and coastal regions including Lahj, Abyan, Shabwa, Hadramout, and al-Mahra.
The internationally recognized Yemeni government, which the United States supports, is formally based in Aden but remains fragmented. The Saudi-backed Presidential Leadership Council serves as the recognized authority, relying heavily on competing factions—including the STC—to govern, confront the Houthis, and maintain territorial control.
“The government has faced serious economic, oversight and capacity challenges and has struggled to deliver basic services,” Toomey explained, adding that this situation has been “compounded by the ongoing fight against the Houthis and Yemen’s broader humanitarian crisis.”
This reliance on various factions has generated friction. Yemen’s internationally recognized government has accused STC-affiliated forces of conducting deadly attacks in Hadramout and warned that the group’s expansion risks sparking conflict between rival anti-Houthi factions. Officials have urged the STC to withdraw from recently seized eastern areas, cautioning that unilateral moves could destabilize the fragile balance in the south.
Atef rejected these characterizations, describing the Hadramout operation as a success demonstrating the STC’s capability to fight what he termed hostile forces operating with the Houthis. He accused these forces of collaborating with “Houthi terrorists” and maintained that STC actions strengthened rather than undermined security.
Houthis: A “Regional and Global” Threat
The STC representative portrayed the Houthis as a destabilizing force extending beyond Yemen’s borders, citing their slogan of “death to America, death to Israel.”
“As long as the Houthis maintain control of Sanaa,” he warned, “they will continue threatening maritime traffic in the Red Sea, continue threatening us in the South and Saudi Arabia, and continue threatening the UAE and the Gulf region.”
Atef accused Houthi factions of cooperating with extremist groups, including Somalia’s al-Shabab, and receiving training and support from Iran and Hezbollah. He dismissed prospects for a negotiated political settlement with the Houthis, stating: “It is impossible. We will talk the language that the Houthis understand.”
Seeking Economic and Security Partnership
Atef repeatedly positioned the STC as a natural U.S. partner on counterterrorism and regional stability. He praised former President Donald Trump’s decision to designate the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization and efforts targeting branches of the Muslim Brotherhood.
“In Yemen, we have Muslim Brotherhood. We believe that they are terrorists. We believe that they sponsor terrorism,” Atef said.
The STC representative also emphasized economic opportunities, stating that the council intends to open southern Yemen’s oil, agriculture, fisheries, and tourism industries to American companies. “We invite U.S. companies to come and explore the oil fields and help us in getting revenues to develop our people,” he said.
The STC’s ultimate objective, according to Atef, is establishing an independent, pro-Western South Yemen that can secure its territory while helping counter Iran’s regional influence.
“Once we have got this front against the Houthis strengthened and emboldened with the support of the international community and the United States,” he said, “that is going to help us very much on the ground to continue our fight and bring stability and peace to the region.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


20 Comments
The Southern Transitional Council’s recent territorial gains highlight the complexity of the Yemeni conflict. Their positioning as a potential US partner bears close watching, as it could have significant implications for the region’s geopolitics.
The STC’s capture of this oil-rich region and their call for a US alliance against the Houthis are noteworthy events in the ongoing Yemeni conflict. The potential for further escalation and fragmentation is a real concern, and the long-term implications for regional stability bear close watching.
The capture of this strategic oil region by the southern separatists is a significant development that could reshape the balance of power in Yemen. It will be important to closely monitor how this plays out and what it means for the future of the country.
The potential for increased US involvement in the conflict is also worth watching, as it could have broader implications for regional stability.
This is an interesting development in the complex conflict in Yemen. The southern separatists seem to be positioning themselves as a potential partner against the Iran-backed Houthis, but the implications for the region’s stability are unclear.
I wonder how this will impact oil and gas operations in the region, given the strategic importance of the captured territory.
The STC’s call for a US alliance against the Houthis is a bold move, but it remains to be seen whether Washington will be willing to deepen its involvement in the Yemeni conflict. This could have far-reaching consequences for the region’s geopolitical landscape.
This is a complex situation with many moving parts. The STC’s control over oil-producing areas gives them significant leverage, but the long-term implications for Yemen’s unity and stability remain uncertain.
This is a significant development in the ongoing power struggle in Yemen. The STC’s control over strategic oil-producing regions could give them significant leverage, but it also raises concerns about the potential for further fragmentation and conflict.
I’m curious to see how the international community, particularly the US and its allies, respond to these latest events.
The STC’s territorial gains and calls for a US alliance against the Houthis are significant developments in the Yemeni conflict. However, the long-term stability and unity of the country remain uncertain, and the potential for further escalation is a real concern.
This is a concerning development in the ongoing power struggle in Yemen. The southern separatists’ control over strategic oil-producing regions could have far-reaching consequences for the region’s geopolitics and stability.
It will be important to closely monitor how the international community, particularly the US, responds to these latest events and their potential implications.
The call for US alliance against the Houthis is noteworthy, as it could signal a shift in regional dynamics. However, caution is warranted given the history of foreign interventions in Yemen’s civil war.
It will be important to monitor how this develops and whether it leads to further escalation or potential opportunities for a negotiated settlement.
This is a significant development in the Yemeni conflict, with the southern separatists asserting control over a strategic oil region and calling for a US alliance against the Houthis. The implications for regional geopolitics and the future of Yemen are complex and far-reaching.
It will be important to closely follow how this situation evolves and how the international community responds to the STC’s actions and demands.
The STC’s positioning as a potential US partner against the Houthis is an interesting development, but it also raises concerns about the potential for further fragmentation and conflict in Yemen. The long-term implications for the country’s unity and stability remain uncertain.
The southern separatists’ call for a US alliance against the Houthis is a bold move that could have significant consequences. It will be important to see how the international community responds and whether this leads to further escalation or potential opportunities for a negotiated settlement.
The strategic importance of the captured oil region also raises questions about the potential economic and geopolitical implications of this development.