Listen to the article
A recent investigation into Metropolitan State University of Denver (MSU Denver) suggests that controversial positions initially attributed to just the university’s Writing Center may be embedded more deeply throughout the institution, raising questions about its adherence to federal laws and commitment to inclusivity.
In December, Complete Colorado reported that MSU Denver’s Writing Center refused to teach Standard American English, labeling it “racist.” While the university subsequently removed the webpage containing these claims and stated they didn’t reflect the institution’s mission, a broader examination of the university’s official communications appears to contradict this disavowal.
A comprehensive survey of MSU Denver’s website reveals marketing that consistently emphasizes a “changemaker” theme. The university’s promotional materials—found on its website and even at Denver International Airport—repeatedly use phrases like “Be a Changemaker” and describe this as reflecting “the University’s unique spirit, purpose and value.”
Critics argue this messaging shows an inherent bias against conservative viewpoints, particularly those with traditional or Burkean perspectives that value historical continuity and measured responses to social change. As a state-funded institution, such apparent discrimination based on political viewpoint could potentially violate First Amendment protections.
More concerning are indications that MSU Denver’s diversity initiatives may exclude certain demographic groups. The university officially endorses “anti-racism” as institutional policy, with formal statements declaring a commitment to “eradicate the racist and oppressive systems deeply rooted in white supremacy” and to “deconstruct systems of whiteness, oppression, racism, inequity, and injustice.”
The university’s Center for Multicultural Engagement and Inclusion offers specialized programs for Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, Indigenous people, Hispanic students (referred to as “Latinx”), African Americans, women, and “men of color.” Notably absent from this list of services are programs specifically for white male students, raising questions about whether the university’s approach to inclusion actually excludes a significant portion of the American population based on race and gender.
This approach appears to align with the university’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which have faced increasing scrutiny nationally. A July 2025 guidance memorandum from the U.S. Department of Justice warned that some DEI programs functionally favor certain ethnic groups over others in ways that may violate civil rights laws.
The investigation also uncovered potential legal concerns regarding MSU Denver’s Immigrant Services Program, which openly advertises services for “undocumented students” since 1989. The program explicitly states its aim to “increase enrollment, retention, and graduation” of students who lack legal immigration status. Some critics question whether actively recruiting and supporting individuals who are in the country unlawfully could constitute obstruction of justice, though this determination would ultimately fall to federal prosecutors.
For Colorado taxpayers funding this public institution, these findings raise important questions about institutional priorities and adherence to both constitutional principles and federal law. While state authorities have shown little inclination to investigate these matters, calls for federal oversight are growing.
The situation at MSU Denver highlights the broader national debate over the proper role of public universities in addressing social issues, the limits of diversity initiatives, and how institutions can create truly inclusive environments without discriminating against any group based on political viewpoint, race, or gender.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
These allegations raise significant concerns about the university’s commitment to intellectual pluralism and equal treatment of all students. As a public institution, MSU Denver should be held to the highest standards of academic integrity and non-discrimination. I hope a thorough investigation can shed light on the facts and lead to constructive solutions.
I’m curious to learn more about the specifics of the allegations and the university’s response. Bias and discrimination in higher education are serious issues that merit thorough investigation. Hopefully, this situation can be resolved in a way that upholds the principles of academic integrity and inclusivity.
This is certainly a concerning situation. I hope the university can resolve these issues through open dialogue and a genuine commitment to diversity and inclusion, rather than biased curriculum or discrimination. It’s critical that all students feel welcome and supported, regardless of their beliefs or background.
The allegations of a biased curriculum and discrimination at MSU Denver are troubling. As a public institution, the university has an obligation to remain politically neutral and respect the diversity of viewpoints among its student body. I hope the administration takes these concerns seriously and takes corrective action if warranted.
This is a concerning report that merits close scrutiny. Universities should be bastions of open inquiry and free expression, not ideological echo chambers. I hope MSU Denver can address these allegations transparently and take concrete steps to foster a truly diverse and welcoming academic environment.
The concerns raised about bias and discrimination at MSU Denver are certainly worth investigating. Universities have a responsibility to foster an environment where students of all backgrounds and beliefs can engage in open and respectful dialogue. I hope the administration takes these allegations seriously and takes steps to uphold these principles.
This is a complex issue that deserves a nuanced approach. While universities should absolutely promote diversity and inclusion, they must also protect the free exchange of ideas. I hope MSU Denver can find a balanced solution that respects all students and upholds academic freedom.
You raise a fair point. Maintaining intellectual diversity on campus is crucial. However, universities also have an obligation to ensure all students feel safe and respected. It will be interesting to see how MSU Denver navigates this delicate balance.
This is a complex issue that touches on important principles of academic freedom and inclusivity. While universities should promote diverse perspectives, they must also ensure all students feel respected and supported, regardless of their beliefs. I hope MSU Denver can find a balanced approach that upholds these vital values.