In a notable break with her former employer, Megyn Kelly took aim at Fox News this week, criticizing what she characterized as the network’s uncritical coverage of the Trump administration’s military actions against Venezuela.

Speaking on Monday, Kelly, who spent over a decade at Fox News before departing in 2017, described the network’s reporting as resembling “Russian propaganda” and highlighted the absence of skeptical viewpoints in its coverage. “There was nothing skeptical,” Kelly remarked, suggesting the network had abandoned journalistic scrutiny in favor of unwavering support for the administration’s foreign policy decisions.

Her comments come amid a broader pattern of enthusiastic endorsement from Fox News personalities regarding the military operation. In the days following the attack, numerous network commentators and hosts have offered effusive praise for President Trump’s decision, describing the action in notably dramatic terms.

Several Fox figures characterized the operation as “justice in action” while others went further, declaring it “absolutely phenomenal on every level.” This language reflects the network’s increasingly partisan approach to coverage of military interventions under the current administration, a stark contrast to the more measured tone typically adopted by traditional news outlets when reporting on complex geopolitical events.

The Venezuela situation represents a significant flashpoint in U.S. foreign policy in Latin America. The South American nation has been mired in political and economic crisis for years, with disputed leadership and humanitarian concerns that have drawn international attention. Military action in the region carries substantial implications for regional stability, U.S.-Latin American relations, and domestic political discourse.

Beyond simply praising the administration, Fox News personalities have taken aim at Democratic politicians and commentators who questioned the military action. Network figures labeled critics of the operation as “immature” and “anti-American,” with some hosts going so far as to claim that Democrats who opposed the action “actually like dictators.”

This rhetoric highlights the increasingly polarized nature of foreign policy discussions in American media, where disagreement over military interventions is often characterized not as legitimate policy debate but as evidence of disloyalty or unpatriotic sentiment.

Kelly’s criticism is particularly noteworthy given her history with the network. As a former Fox News star who hosted “The Kelly File,” her insider perspective lends weight to criticisms about the network’s editorial approach. Since leaving Fox, Kelly has occasionally commented on her former employer’s coverage, though rarely with such pointed criticism.

Media analysts note that cable news networks have increasingly sorted into partisan camps, with Fox News positioning itself as supportive of Republican administrations while critical of Democratic ones. This pattern has become more pronounced in recent years, with many media observers pointing to a blurring of lines between straight news reporting and opinion programming.

The controversy underscores ongoing concerns about how military actions are covered in an era of heightened media polarization. Traditional journalistic standards call for balanced reporting on matters of war and peace, including perspectives from multiple viewpoints and a willingness to question official narratives regardless of which party controls the White House.

As the situation in Venezuela continues to develop, the stark differences in how various media outlets cover the conflict reflect broader divisions in American political discourse. Kelly’s criticism serves as a reminder of the challenges facing viewers seeking comprehensive, objective information about complex foreign policy decisions.

For Fox News, which has maintained strong ratings and viewer loyalty particularly among conservative audiences, such criticism from a former star personality represents an unusual public relations challenge, coming from someone who once was one of the network’s most recognizable faces.