Listen to the article
In a stunning critique of her former employer, media personality Megyn Kelly has lambasted Fox News for what she describes as uncritical coverage of potential U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, comparing the network’s reporting to “Russian propaganda.”
Speaking on Monday’s episode of her SiriusXM program “The Megyn Kelly Show,” the former Fox News anchor expressed dismay at what she perceived as the network’s unquestioning support for potential military action under the Trump administration.
“I turned on Fox News yesterday, and I’m sorry, but it was like watching Russian propaganda,” Kelly told listeners. “There was nothing skeptical. It was all rah-rah cheerleading, yes, let’s go.”
Kelly, who spent over a decade at Fox News before departing in 2017, emphasized that while she supports the U.S. military and President Trump, her previous experiences as a news anchor have taught her to approach such situations with caution.
“I believe in President Trump, but there are serious reasons to just exercise a note of caution before we just get on the rah-rah train,” she explained. “I have done that enough times in my career as a Fox News anchor to have been embarrassed enough to know I’m going to stay on the yellow light for this.”
Her comments come amid increasing speculation about U.S. involvement in Venezuela, a nation that has faced years of economic crisis and political turmoil under President Nicolas Maduro. Venezuela possesses some of the world’s largest oil reserves, making it a strategically significant region where Russia, China, and Cuba have established strong footholds.
Kelly acknowledged the strategic importance of Venezuela but rejected what she called “bullsh*t about law enforcement” as justification for intervention. Instead, she pointed to the United States’ problematic history with regime change operations.
“I have seen what happens when you cheerlead, unabashedly, U.S. intervention in foreign countries thinking it’s for our good and for the national and the international good only to wind up with what we’ve called quagmire in places like Iraq, not to mention Libya,” she said.
The media figure expressed particular concern about potential American casualties in any military engagement. “Trump’s threat of putting ‘boots on the ground,'” she noted, raises serious questions about who would bear the burden of combat. “Whose boots? Because I have a 16-year-old boy, and I have a 12-year-old boy, and I have a 14-year-old girl, and a lot of my listeners have children too who are actually the ones who might have to fill the boots.”
Kelly also voiced alarm about President Trump’s increasing alignment with hawkish politicians like Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who has consistently advocated for aggressive foreign policy stances.
“The fact that Lindsey Graham is standing next to him, going, ‘Yes! Yes!’ is enough for me to know I don’t want it. I’m concerned,” Kelly remarked. “All of the neocons have been celebrating this whole thing like it’s Christmas in January, and that alone gives me pause. When Lindsey Graham is cheering, I’m not.”
Her critique represents a notable break from the generally supportive coverage Fox News has provided to the Trump administration. It also highlights growing divisions among conservatives regarding foreign policy approaches, particularly as the United States navigates complex geopolitical relationships in Latin America.
As the situation in Venezuela continues to develop, Kelly’s stance underscores the tensions between nationalist and interventionist factions within conservative media circles. Her comments also reflect broader public concerns about potential military engagements following decades of American involvement in conflicts across the Middle East and elsewhere.
“I think I speak for a lot of moms, and dads for that matter, when I say I’m staying in yellow territory until we know more,” Kelly concluded, “and I will not be joining the Fox News cheerleading brigade this time. I’ve been burned too many times.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
This is a complex issue, and I appreciate Kelly’s willingness to speak out against what she perceives as problematic coverage. However, I’d encourage people to look at the broader context and make their own judgments about the merits of potential military action.
Agreed. It’s important to avoid knee-jerk reactions and instead carefully consider the nuances and potential implications of any proposed military intervention.
While I respect Megyn Kelly’s perspective, I’m not sure I would go so far as to call Fox News’ coverage ‘propaganda.’ Every news outlet has its own biases and agendas, and it’s up to the audience to critically evaluate the information they’re receiving.
That’s a fair point. It’s important to remember that all news sources, regardless of their political leanings, have a certain degree of subjectivity in their reporting. Maintaining a critical eye is key.
While I respect Megyn Kelly, I’m not sure I fully agree with her characterization of Fox News’ coverage as ‘propaganda.’ Every news network has its own biases, and it’s up to viewers to think critically and seek out diverse perspectives.
That’s a fair point. It’s ultimately up to the audience to assess the credibility and objectivity of news sources, rather than relying on one person’s opinion.
Megyn Kelly’s critique raises some valid concerns about the need for balanced and critical reporting, even on issues that may be politically sensitive. As viewers, we should strive to consume news from a variety of sources and form our own opinions.
Well said. Maintaining a diversity of perspectives and a healthy degree of skepticism is crucial, especially when it comes to matters of national security and foreign policy.
Interesting perspective from Megyn Kelly on Fox News’ coverage. As a former anchor there, she likely has valuable insights into the network’s approach. It’s good to see dissenting voices and critical analysis, even from within the industry.
I agree – it’s important to maintain a balance and skepticism, even when reporting on issues related to the military or the administration. Uncritical cheerleading can be just as harmful as outright propaganda.
Megyn Kelly’s critique of Fox News’ coverage raises valid points about the need for more nuanced and critical reporting, even on issues related to the military and the administration. As viewers, we should strive to seek out diverse perspectives and form our own opinions.
I agree. It’s important to maintain a degree of skepticism and avoid blindly accepting the narrative presented by any single news source, regardless of its political leanings.
Megyn Kelly’s comments raise some important questions about the role of the media in reporting on sensitive national security issues. While I don’t necessarily agree with her characterization of Fox News’ coverage, I appreciate her willingness to voice her concerns.
Absolutely. Healthy debate and constructive criticism within the media industry can help promote more balanced and responsible journalism, which is crucial for an informed citizenry.