Listen to the article
Former Fox News Host Megyn Kelly Criticizes Network’s Venezuela Coverage as “Russian Propaganda”
Conservative podcast host Megyn Kelly has issued a stark warning to her audience about uncritically supporting President Donald Trump’s recent military operation in Venezuela, describing Fox News’s coverage as resembling “Russian propaganda” in its lack of skepticism.
Kelly, who spent 13 years at Fox News, criticized her former employer on Monday’s episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show” for what she called “cheerleading” the administration’s actions that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
“I turned on Fox News yesterday, and I’m sorry, but it was like watching Russian propaganda. There was nothing skeptical,” Kelly said. “It was all ‘rah rah cheerleading, yes, let’s go.’ But there are serious reasons to just exercise a note of caution before we just get on the ‘rah rah train.'”
The media personality reflected on her own past at the network, admitting she had contributed to similar uncritical coverage of U.S. foreign interventions during her tenure, something that occasionally left her “embarrassed” when situations did not resolve positively. She suggested there had been an expectation at Fox News to support conservative administrations regardless of their actions.
“I will not be joining the Fox News cheerleading brigade this time. I’ve been burned too many times,” Kelly stated firmly.
Her comments come as current Fox News personalities have largely portrayed the Venezuela operation in positive terms. Sean Hannity suggested Venezuela owed American companies oil that it had “stolen,” while Laura Ingraham characterized Trump’s move as a “needed global reset.” Jesse Watters offered dramatic retellings of the military operation, emphasizing the president’s success.
Kelly, now hosting her independent podcast, urged her audience to adopt a “yellow light” approach and think critically about recent events. She cited historical precedents as reason for caution.
“I have seen what happens when you cheerlead, unabashedly, U.S. intervention in foreign countries, thinking it’s for our good and the international good, only to wind up with what we called a quagmire,” she explained.
The military operation in question took place over the weekend, when U.S. forces launched a targeted strike in Caracas at Trump’s direction. The operation resulted in the capture of Maduro and Flores, who were subsequently brought to New York to face federal prosecution on charges related to drug trafficking and weapons offenses. The pair appeared in court Monday, where they pleaded not guilty to their respective charges.
In the aftermath of the operation, Trump claimed the United States would temporarily take control of Venezuela and reportedly warned the current interim leader to comply with his requests or “face a worse fate.” Administration officials have also stated that the U.S. had taken control of a Venezuelan oil reserve.
Kelly expressed concern about this approach based on America’s track record with regime change. “We’re not great at going into these foreign countries, decapitating them at the leadership level and then saying ‘we’re going to either steer the country to a better place or it’s going to steer itself,'” she noted, referencing previous U.S. interventions in Iraq and Libya that led to prolonged instability.
The situation represents a significant escalation in U.S. policy toward Venezuela, a country that holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves and has been under various U.S. sanctions since 2019 when the Trump administration recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the country’s legitimate president.
Kelly’s criticism highlights growing divisions among conservative media figures about the wisdom of foreign military interventions, even as much of the right-wing media ecosystem continues to strongly support Trump’s actions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
Megyn Kelly makes a fair point about the need for more critical, skeptical coverage of foreign policy issues like Venezuela. But I’m not convinced that Fox News’s reporting necessarily qualifies as “Russian propaganda.” That’s a very serious accusation that requires strong evidence.
As someone with experience working at Fox News, Megyn Kelly’s perspective carries weight. However, I don’t think it’s fair to label the entire network as a “propaganda machine.” There are certainly examples of biased coverage, but also moments of legitimate journalism. We should be wary of oversimplifying.
While I respect Kelly’s stance, I’m not sure I fully agree. Fox News has a clear conservative bias, but that doesn’t necessarily make their Venezuela coverage “Russian propaganda.” There are legitimate reasons to be supportive of the administration’s actions there.
That’s a fair point. Reasonable people can disagree on the merits of the Venezuela situation. The key is to avoid knee-jerk reactions and instead seek out nuanced, fact-based analysis from a range of credible sources.
Interesting perspective from Megyn Kelly. It’s always important to maintain a critical eye, even when it comes to media outlets we’ve trusted in the past. Uncritical cheerleading can lead to dangerous oversimplifications, especially around foreign policy issues.
I agree. Even reputable news sources can fall into the trap of confirmation bias at times. Healthy skepticism and diverse viewpoints are crucial for getting the full picture.
Kelly raises some valid concerns about the risks of uncritical media coverage, but I’m not sure her characterization of Fox News is entirely accurate. They may have a conservative slant, but that doesn’t automatically make them a “propaganda machine.” It’s a complex issue worth deeper examination.