Listen to the article
Russia Deflects Blame for School Violence, Targets Ukraine According to Disinformation Center
Russian authorities are attempting to shift responsibility for a growing wave of school violence onto Ukraine and unnamed “external curators,” according to a recent statement from Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD).
The center, which operates under Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, reported in a Facebook post that Kremlin propaganda is working to create a narrative that blames outside forces for the troubling trend of violence in Russia’s educational institutions.
The incidents in question involve teenagers attacking classmates and teachers using various weapons including knives, flammable substances, and air guns. According to the CCD, Russia recorded at least 11 attacks on schools and other educational facilities in 2025, with five more similar incidents already documented since the beginning of 2026.
These accusations against Ukraine were notably voiced by Kateryna Mizulina, director of Russia’s Safe Internet League, an individual against whom Ukraine has already imposed sanctions.
“This is a typical tactic of Russian propaganda – to look for an ‘Ukrainian trace’ in crimes that occur inside the country, in order to divert attention from its own systemic problems,” the CCD stated. “Instead of analyzing causes, providing psychological support to teenagers, and reviewing educational policy, the Russian authorities again appeal to the image of an ‘enemy from abroad’.”
The center emphasized that Russia’s attempt to blame Ukraine serves primarily as a distraction from addressing deep-seated internal issues that may be contributing to the violence. According to their analysis, the increase in violent incidents within Russia’s schools stems from broader societal problems within Russia itself.
“The rise in violence in the educational environment is not a coincidence, but the result of systemic degradation,” the CCD noted. “Russia has for years cultivated violence, militarized children through ‘military-patriotic’ programs, and formed the image of the enemy, presenting aggression as a social norm.”
This pattern of blaming external forces for domestic problems aligns with Russia’s long-standing propaganda strategies. By directing attention toward alleged foreign interference, the Russian government can potentially avoid confronting challenging social issues and policy failures that may be contributing to the rise in school violence.
The growing frequency of these attacks raises serious concerns about the psychological welfare of Russian students and the effectiveness of the country’s educational and social support systems. Rather than addressing these concerns through evidence-based approaches to prevent youth violence, Russian officials appear to be doubling down on conspiracy theories involving Ukraine.
Additionally, the CCD reported that Russian propaganda networks are launching a new wave of content across social media platforms, including AI-generated videos, to promote a narrative advocating for “peace at any price” in relation to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
This development comes amid continued tensions between the two countries, with information warfare playing an increasingly significant role alongside military operations. The attempt to link Ukraine to domestic violence in Russian schools represents an expansion of this information conflict into new territories.
Security experts note that such propaganda tactics serve multiple purposes for the Russian government: they distract from domestic problems, reinforce existing narratives about external enemies, and potentially justify continued aggressive policies toward Ukraine.
As school violence continues to affect communities across Russia, the international community and independent observers will be watching closely to see whether Russian authorities develop substantive approaches to addressing the root causes of these incidents or continue to rely on external scapegoating.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


11 Comments
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward Propaganda might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.