Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a fiery response to mounting social media speculation, North Leeward Member of Parliament Carlos James has firmly denied ownership of a luxury Maserati vehicle currently sitting at Port Kingstown.

The high-end vehicle, valued at over half a million dollars, has become the center of intense public discussion across social media platforms and local radio shows in recent weeks, with rumors linking it to the parliamentarian.

James addressed these claims directly during a political meeting held in Spring Village, recounting a recent interaction with a journalist who had inquired about the vehicle’s ownership. “They say it’s the millionaire from North Leeward who owns it,” James told the gathering, characterizing the rumors as deliberate political propaganda orchestrated by the opposition New Democratic Party (NDP).

The MP expressed visible frustration with what he described as the opposition’s pattern of spreading misinformation rather than engaging in substantive policy debate. “Instead of focusing on issues that matter to constituents, they resort to lies, propaganda, and backwardness,” James said, reaffirming his commitment to meaningful political discourse that addresses the genuine concerns of voters.

During his address, James also took the opportunity to clarify some personal matters, making pointed remarks about his character. “Certainly I don’t love men in any special way, and I’m not bad-minded. Stop calling my name,” he stated, though the context for these personal comments remains unclear.

The Maserati controversy comes amid escalating political tensions in the region, as parties position themselves ahead of upcoming electoral contests. Luxury vehicles have historically been sensitive political symbols in Caribbean nations, where questions of wealth disparity and political privilege often become campaign flashpoints.

In a related development, James has also been responding to separate allegations from NDP North Leeward candidate Kishore Shallow regarding a company called Belmonte Holdings Ltd. The MP has categorically denied any ownership stake or association with the company and indicated he is prepared to pursue legal action to address what he considers defamatory claims.

“I have no ownership or connection whatsoever with Belmonte Holdings,” James stated. “These baseless accusations are part of a coordinated attempt to damage my reputation, and I am fully prepared to defend myself through appropriate legal channels.”

Political observers note that these exchanges reflect the increasingly personal nature of political campaigning in the region, where candidates’ personal finances and business interests often become subjects of intense scrutiny and speculation.

The Maserati at the center of the controversy remains at Port Kingstown, with no official confirmation of its actual ownership. Import records for luxury vehicles are typically public information, though accessing such documentation can involve bureaucratic delays.

James, who has represented the North Leeward constituency since winning his seat in Parliament, has consistently positioned himself as a champion for community development and economic opportunities for his constituents. His supporters maintain that the recent allegations represent political distractions intended to undermine his work in the constituency.

As the situation develops, political analysts suggest that both James and his political opponents will likely continue to address these matters in public forums, with voters ultimately deciding whose narrative they find most credible as election season approaches.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. While luxury vehicle ownership is always a sensitive topic, MP James seems to have provided a clear and direct response. Hopefully this puts the rumor to rest so the discussion can move to more constructive matters.

    • Yes, addressing the claims transparently was the right move. Constituents deserve leaders who are upfront, not evasive, about their personal affairs.

  2. While the Maserati ownership allegations are juicy gossip, they don’t appear to be grounded in facts. MP James seems to have provided a clear rebuttal. Hopefully this allows the focus to shift to the real policy challenges facing the community.

  3. Jennifer Martin on

    I’m curious to learn more about the policy priorities and economic development plans that MP James and his party are focused on, beyond the Maserati controversy. Addressing real issues facing the community would be more productive.

    • Robert I. Taylor on

      Good point. Shifting the discourse to the MP’s policy agenda and his vision for the constituency would be a more constructive use of everyone’s time.

  4. The Maserati ownership allegations seem like political posturing rather than substantive debate. It’s important for elected officials to address real issues affecting their constituents, not get bogged down in unverified rumors.

  5. Regardless of one’s political affiliation, exaggerated claims and unproven accusations are unhelpful. I hope all elected representatives can find a way to engage in more constructive, issue-focused dialogue that serves the best interests of constituents.

  6. Linda H. Miller on

    Spreading unverified claims about an elected official’s personal assets seems more like political grandstanding than good-faith debate. I hope all parties can move past these distractions and have a substantive discussion about the issues that matter most to voters.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.