Listen to the article
In a time of severe budget cuts across Berlin’s public services, the city’s coalition government has come under fire for allegedly misusing cultural funding to support politically aligned projects, with significant sums directed toward pro-Israel initiatives amid the ongoing Gaza conflict.
The scandal centers on accusations that Berlin’s culture ministry, led by the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), channeled substantial public funds to projects personally selected by CDU state politicians Christian Goiny and Dirk Stettner. These “free-hand” funding decisions were made under former culture senator Joe Chialo and his successor Sarah Wedl-Wilson, both CDU-affiliated officials.
Opposition parties, including the Greens and the Left Party, have demanded a parliamentary inquiry, accusing the CDU of embezzling public funds. Green Party leaders Bettina Jarasch and Werner Graf criticized the partisan allocation of resources, while Left Party representatives Manuela Schmidt and Anne Helm condemned the “feudal manner” in which the Culture Senate was distributing funds.
Beyond simple allegations of cronyism, critics point to a more troubling pattern: the use of Berlin’s cultural budget to finance what they describe as war propaganda. One prominent example is the “We Will Dance Again” exhibition about the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel’s Nova music festival. The event received substantial funding and featured high-profile CDU politicians as patrons, including Berlin Mayor Kai Wegner and Federal Education Minister Karin Prien.
The exhibition has drawn criticism for celebrating controversial figures like Elkana Federman, described as a “hero of October 7.” Federman belongs to the far-right group Tzav 9, which has been sanctioned by both the EU and United States for human rights violations. Even the SPD-aligned weekly Die Zeit noted that the exhibition’s second anniversary opening might have acknowledged civilian victims in Gaza.
These funding decisions come against a backdrop of severe cuts to Berlin’s cultural sector. This year alone, the Senate slashed €130 million from the total culture budget, with additional cuts to healthcare and public infrastructure, all justified by claimed financial constraints.
Yet in 2023, following the October 7 attacks, the Berlin government created a €20 million special budget for 2024-2025 for what it described as “projects against antisemitism and to promote interreligious dialogue.” This fund was later augmented with an additional €3.4 million package for “projects of special political significance” in 2025, with 18 organizations handpicked by CDU politicians Goiny and Stettner receiving access to approximately €2.65 million by September.
The largest single allocation—€750,000—went to First Music Production GmbH & Co. KG for the “We Will Dance Again” exhibition. In total, the exhibition received €1.383 million, representing the largest individual allocation from this fund.
A key figure in the exhibition is Dr. Melody Sucharewicz, a self-described “consultant on political communication and strategy” who has written controversial commentaries in Jewish publications defending Israeli military actions and characterizing critics of Netanyahu’s policies as “useful idiots” of Hamas.
CDU MP Goiny, now under investigation by the public prosecutor’s office on suspicion of embezzlement, defended his actions on Facebook, claiming that as a parliamentarian, he had the right to “make such decisions.” He characterized criticism from the Left Party and Greens as attempts to “hinder the fight against antisemitism.”
Critics argue that all parties represented in the Berlin House of Representatives have responded to mass protests against the Gaza war by labeling them as antisemitic, effectively justifying arrests of activists, intimidation of Arab and Palestinian students, and increased surveillance of pro-Palestine advocates.
In January 2024, an “anti-discrimination clause” was introduced stating that cultural funding “must not benefit organizations classified as extremist and/or terrorist.” This has reportedly led to the systematic silencing of pro-Palestinian activists and artists, including the closure of the former Oyoun cultural center.
Despite occasional expressions of concern for Palestinian suffering, the Left Party’s position has remained largely aligned with the broader German policy stance. At a recent state conference, the party leadership avoided taking a firm stance against Israeli government actions or the suppression of pro-Palestinian opposition, with internal advocates for Palestinian solidarity withdrawing their demands in the name of party unity.
As Berlin’s government continues to defend these funding priorities amid broader austerity measures, the controversy highlights the complex intersection of cultural policy, political alignment, and Germany’s position on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


6 Comments
This is a concerning accusation of misusing public funds for politically-aligned projects. If true, it’s a serious breach of trust and raises questions about the integrity of the decision-making process. Taxpayer money should be allocated in a transparent and impartial manner, not funneled to pet projects.
It’s important to understand the full context and evidence behind these allegations before rushing to judgment. Proper oversight and accountability for public spending are essential, regardless of political affiliations. I hope a thorough and impartial investigation can shed light on what happened.
If these allegations are substantiated, it would be a disappointing abuse of power and public trust. Elected officials have a duty to act with integrity and in the best interests of their constituents, not to serve their own political agendas.
While the details are still emerging, the allegations of misusing public funds for political messaging are concerning. Transparency and impartiality should be the guiding principles for how governments allocate cultural funding.
This story highlights the ongoing tensions around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and how it can become entangled with domestic politics. While supporting cultural initiatives is important, the use of public funds for partisan messaging is concerning and merits scrutiny.
This situation speaks to the broader challenges of balancing cultural initiatives, political interests, and responsible use of public resources. It’s a complex issue that requires nuanced discussion and a commitment to upholding democratic principles.