Listen to the article
The Trump administration has significantly scaled back a critical census test designed to improve methods for the 2030 census, eliminating four of the six originally planned testing locations. According to a Commerce Department notice set for formal publication Tuesday, the test which began Monday will now proceed only in Huntsville, Alabama, and Spartanburg, South Carolina.
The Census Bureau had initially announced six test sites in 2024, which included Colorado Springs, Colorado, tribal lands in Arizona, western North Carolina, and western Texas. These additional locations would have provided crucial data on hard-to-count populations, but have now been removed from the testing plan.
When contacted for comment, the Census Bureau did not provide specific reasons for reducing the number of sites. Instead, the agency stated on its website that it “remains committed to conducting the most accurate count in history for the 2030 Census and looks forward to the continued partnership with local communities.”
The decision has raised significant concerns among population experts. Mark Mather, an associate vice president at the nonpartisan Population Reference Bureau, characterized the limitation to just two metro areas in the South as “a step backward” in census preparation.
“The Census Bureau would be essentially flying blind into communities that need testing most — tribal lands, rural areas with limited connectivity and places with historically low response rates,” Mather explained. “You can’t fix what you don’t test.”
Terri Ann Lowenthal, a former congressional staffer who specializes in census issues, expressed similar concerns, calling the elimination of test sites “an ominous sign for the 2030 Census.” She noted that “the new plan for 2026 is unclear.”
The census test serves several critical purposes in preparation for the actual decennial count. It allows the bureau to develop better methods for counting populations that were undercounted in the previous census, test messaging strategies, and evaluate data processing systems during active collection periods. One of the new methodologies being tested for 2030 involves using U.S. Postal Service workers to perform tasks previously assigned to census workers.
The original six locations had been strategically selected to represent diverse population challenges. Some sites featured rural areas where residents lack mail delivery or internet service, while others included traditionally hard-to-count populations such as tribal lands, rapidly growing communities with new construction, and group quarters like dormitories, care facilities, and military barracks.
This reduction in test sites follows a concerning pattern from the 2020 census preparation, when funding shortages forced the bureau to conduct only one comprehensive test in Providence, Rhode Island, in 2018, canceling other planned tests.
The stakes for accurate census counts remain extraordinarily high. The decennial census determines each state’s congressional representation and Electoral College votes, directly impacting the balance of political power in the country. Perhaps even more significantly, census data guides the distribution of approximately $2.8 trillion in annual federal spending across the nation, affecting everything from education and healthcare to infrastructure and social services.
The reduction in test sites could potentially impact the bureau’s ability to address undercounts that have historically affected communities of color, rural populations, and other marginalized groups. Without comprehensive testing across diverse geographic and demographic settings, the 2030 census may face challenges in achieving its goal of being “the most accurate count in history.”
Officials have not indicated whether additional tests might be scheduled to compensate for the eliminated locations, leaving questions about how the Census Bureau will gather sufficient data to improve its methodologies for the upcoming decennial count.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
15 Comments
As someone interested in mining and energy issues, I’m curious how this could impact data collection on resource-rich regions. Thorough testing is important for an accurate picture of population trends and needs.
Good point. Proper census data is crucial for understanding resource demand and informing policy decisions in the mining and energy sectors.
While efficiency is important, the decision to cut testing sites seems overly narrow. A comprehensive, nationwide testing plan is crucial for ensuring the 2030 census reflects the full diversity of the US population.
I concur. Limiting the testing scope could lead to undercounting of certain groups and regions, undermining the integrity of the final census results.
As someone who follows the mining and energy sectors, I’m worried that reduced testing in resource-rich regions could skew the census data in those areas. Thorough preparation is crucial for an accurate 2030 count.
While I understand the desire to streamline the testing process, eliminating nearly two-thirds of the planned sites seems excessive. I hope the Census Bureau can find ways to get representative data across the country.
This is a troubling development. The census should strive for inclusivity and impartiality, not focus testing in particular regions. I hope the Census Bureau can find a way to broaden the testing scope before 2030.
Agreed. A fair and representative census is essential for fair political representation and resource allocation. Limiting testing sites raises concerns about the integrity of the process.
This decision seems politically motivated to favor certain regions over others. A fair and comprehensive census should include diverse testing locations nationwide, not just in the South.
I agree, the reduction in sites raises questions about the administration’s intentions. The census needs to be impartial and inclusive to be truly representative.
Cutting back on census testing sites is concerning. Hard-to-count populations need to be adequately represented. I hope the Census Bureau can find ways to reach these communities despite the reduced testing plan.
Yes, an accurate census is critical for fair representation and resource allocation. Limiting testing could lead to undercounting of vulnerable groups.
I’m disappointed to see the administration scaling back on census testing. Robust preparation is key to an accurate count, especially for hard-to-reach populations. This decision seems short-sighted.
The decision to focus the 2030 census testing on the South is concerning. A diverse set of testing locations is needed to ensure the final count accurately reflects the full population.
I agree, a limited testing scope could lead to undercounting of certain demographics and communities. This could have far-reaching implications for representation and resource allocation.