Listen to the article
Party Rebels: Inside the House’s Most Independent Voters
Party-line votes remain the dominant pattern in the House of Representatives, but a small yet influential group of lawmakers consistently breaks ranks with their parties. These political mavericks are reshaping close outcomes and exposing fault lines within both Democratic and Republican caucuses.
An analysis of voting data from the 119th Congress reveals which representatives most frequently defied their party leadership in 2025, highlighting members whose independence has become their calling card.
Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, tops the list with an astounding 83 votes against his Democratic colleagues—nearly a quarter of all votes cast. His willingness to cross the aisle made headlines throughout the year, particularly as he faced legal troubles that culminated in a pardon from President Donald Trump in December 2025.
“I vote for my district, not my party,” Cuellar has maintained throughout his congressional career. Despite his maverick voting record, Cuellar won re-election in 2024 by a relatively comfortable 5.5% margin, demonstrating that independence can sometimes be politically viable.
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., ranks second, voting against fellow Democrats 77 times, or 22.5% of all votes. Representing a highly competitive district she narrowly held in 2024 with a 51.7%-47.9% victory, Gluesenkamp Perez has supported Republican positions on immigration enforcement and defense spending.
Her recent leadership in rebuking fellow Democrat Rep. Chuy Garcia drew significant criticism from party colleagues but may help her maintain credibility with moderate voters in her swing district.
The third most independent voter is libertarian-leaning Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who broke with GOP colleagues 73 times (22.3%). Massie’s principled stands on government spending and transparency have made him a familiar figure to political observers. He recently led efforts to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act and was one of just two Republicans to oppose Trump’s signature “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”
Rep. Jared Golden, D-Maine, takes the fourth spot with 72 votes against Democratic leadership (20.8%). Golden, who won his last election by just 0.6%, has announced he will not seek re-election in 2026, citing the increasingly polarized political climate.
“We’re losing the ability to find common ground,” Golden said in his retirement announcement. His most notable deviation came when he was the lone Democrat to help Republicans pass a year-long government funding bill in March.
Rounding out the top five is Rep. Don Davis, D-N.C., who voted against his party on 70 occasions (20.3%). Like many on this list, Davis represents a competitive district, having won his 2024 race by just 1.7%.
Other notable party dissenters include Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, D-Texas (65 votes, 19.76%), Rep. Adam Gray, D-Calif. (60 votes, 18.4%), and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas (53 votes, 15.7%), who recently announced he will run for Texas attorney general in 2026 rather than seek re-election to the House.
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., former chairman of the Freedom Caucus, ranks ninth with 48 votes against Republican positions (14.2%). Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., rounds out the top ten with 46 dissenting votes (13.8%), a surprising entry given his typically low-key approach to politics.
Political analysts note that many of these independent voters represent competitive districts where strict party-line voting could be politically dangerous. For Democrats on the list, many represent areas where President Trump performed well, forcing them to calibrate their voting records carefully.
“These members are the barometers of what’s politically possible in Congress,” said one congressional scholar. “When legislation has a chance to pass with bipartisan support, these are often the representatives who make it happen.”
As the new legislative year approaches, these mavericks will likely continue playing an outsized role in a closely divided House where nearly every vote matters.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


15 Comments
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.