Listen to the article
A former special education associate in Iowa has filed a lawsuit against her school district after being fired over a Facebook post she made following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September 2025.
Stacey Sumpter, who worked for the Knoxville Community School District, was terminated on September 12, just two days after Kirk’s death. Her dismissal came after she posted on her personal Facebook page: “Normally I would say Auf wider sehen; but since that technically means ’til I see you again’… So since I never wish to see you again, to you; I say goodbye.” The comment was made in response to a photo with a list titled “Things to remember about Charlie Kirk” that contained various claims against the slain activist.
According to the lawsuit filed against the district and Superintendent Cassi Pearson, Sumpter’s attorneys argue that her post was “a personal, private expression of her viewpoint” made while off-duty. They emphasize that the statement “did not threaten anyone, did not incite imminent unlawful action or violence, and was not directed at any member of the school community or broader community.” The complaint also notes that Sumpter’s post did not mention her workplace or connect her to the school in any way.
The sequence of events began on September 11, when “community members contacted the district demanding punishment for the content of Ms. Sumpter’s speech,” according to the complaint. That same day, Principal Jory Houser called Sumpter into his office during lunch to inform her that the district had received complaints about her post. Sumpter completed her workday, but later that evening received a call from Houser notifying her of her suspension pending an investigation. The following morning, she was informed of her termination.
In a termination letter, Superintendent Pearson allegedly wrote that the “language used in the post is not respectful and conveys hatred” and that Sumpter’s employment was being “terminated immediately” because of the Facebook post. When contacted for comment, Pearson told Fox News Digital that the district does not comment on pending litigation.
Sumpter’s attorneys contend that her firing violated not only the school district’s own policies but also her constitutional rights. They claim she was denied due process as promised in district policies, receiving neither proper notice of potential termination nor the opportunity to defend herself. The lawsuit argues that the termination constituted a violation of Sumpter’s First Amendment rights since she was speaking as a private citizen and not as part of her school duties.
“The Defendants transformed a moment of public debate into an employment crisis for Ms. Sumpter. Instead of respecting her right as a citizen to comment on political events of the utmost public interest or even respecting her right to due process to present her side of the story, they chose to silence and punish her,” the complaint states.
This case represents part of a growing trend of legal challenges from educators in Iowa who have faced professional consequences for comments made about Kirk following his assassination. At least two other Iowa educators have filed similar lawsuits.
Matthew Kargol, a former Oskaloosa teacher, sued after being fired for posting “1 Nazi Down” after Kirk’s death. His complaint describes the comment as “rhetorical hyperbole about a widely reported public event.” Meanwhile, Creston teacher Melisa Crook sued her district after being placed on leave for calling Kirk a “terrible human being” and stating that “him not being here is a blessing,” while also clarifying she didn’t condone violence. A judge has temporarily blocked her termination pending a ruling on a preliminary injunction.
The cases highlight the ongoing tension between educators’ free speech rights as private citizens and school districts’ concerns about community standards and professional conduct expectations, particularly in relation to highly charged political events.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
This is a tricky situation. The school district likely felt the comment was disruptive, but terminating the employee over a private social media post is a bold move that could face legal challenges. It will be interesting to see how the courts rule on the free speech issues at stake.
While the aide’s comment was controversial, firing her over a personal social media post sets a dangerous precedent. Employees should be able to express political views outside of work without fear of retaliation, as long as they don’t interfere with their job.
I can understand the school district’s concerns, but terminating an employee over a Facebook post made off-duty seems heavy-handed. Unless the comment was truly threatening, this feels more like an overreaction than justified discipline.
This seems like a complex case with potential free speech considerations. While the aide’s comment may have been unwise, firing her over a personal social media post could set a troubling precedent. Curious to see how the courts rule on this.
The school district’s decision to fire this employee is concerning. Employees should generally have the right to express personal political views outside of work, as long as they don’t directly impact their job duties. This seems like a worrying infringement on free speech.