Listen to the article
Smithsonian Removes Trump Impeachment References from Portrait Display
President Donald Trump’s portrait display at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery has undergone notable changes, with references to his two impeachments removed from the accompanying text. The alteration marks a significant shift in how the museum documents presidential history.
The original text that previously accompanied Trump’s portrait mentioned his Supreme Court nominations and his administration’s COVID-19 vaccine development efforts, followed by acknowledgment that he was “impeached twice, on charges of abuse of power and incitement of insurrection after supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021,” though “acquitted by the Senate in both trials.”
Now, a different photograph of Trump appears in the gallery without any accompanying biographical text block, though the original text remains available online. The new image, taken by White House photographer Daniel Torok, shows Trump leaning over his Oval Office desk with a furrowed brow. It’s displayed with medallions noting his status as the 45th and 47th president.
Trump is currently the only president in the gallery whose display lacks an extended text description. In contrast, references to the impeachments of Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, as well as Richard Nixon’s resignation during the Watergate scandal, remain intact in their respective displays.
The White House has not directly confirmed whether it requested these changes. White House spokesman Davis Ingle praised the new photograph but did not address questions about the removed text, stating only that the image ensures Trump’s “unmatched aura… will be felt throughout the halls of the National Portrait Gallery.”
The Smithsonian, in a statement responding to press inquiries, did not clarify whether the White House had requested the changes. Instead, it characterized the modifications as part of a planned update to the America’s Presidents gallery, which “will undergo a larger refresh this Spring.” The museum added that it has been “exploring quotes or tombstone labels, which provide only general information” for some new exhibitions.
The portrait display changes come in the wake of Trump’s August directive ordering Smithsonian officials to review all exhibits before the nation celebrates the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4. The administration stated this effort would “ensure alignment with the president’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.”
This appears to be part of a broader effort by Trump to reshape how federal institutions document U.S. history and culture. The Smithsonian noted that “The history of Presidential impeachments continues to be represented in our museums, including the National Museum of American History,” suggesting the information remains available elsewhere in the institution’s network.
Trump has been vocal about his intentions to influence historical presentations. In recent months, he fired the head archivist of the National Archives and indicated his intention to remove the National Portrait Gallery’s director, Kim Sajet. While Sajet initially maintained the support of the Smithsonian’s governing board, she eventually resigned.
Within the White House itself, Trump has installed a “Presidential Walk of Fame” featuring gilded photographs of himself and his predecessors—notably excluding President Biden, who is represented only by an autopen. The accompanying plaques, reportedly authored primarily by Trump himself, present a subjective view of presidential history that praises Trump while describing Biden as “by far, the worst President in American History.”
These changes reflect ongoing tensions over who controls the narrative of American history in federal institutions and raise questions about political influence over cultural and historical presentations in government-funded museums.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
20 Comments
Removing references to Trump’s impeachments from his Smithsonian portrait display seems like a questionable decision, as it potentially whitewashes an important part of his presidential history. However, I can understand the desire to avoid further political controversy.
It will be interesting to see how other museums and cultural institutions handle the presentation of similarly contentious presidential histories in the future.
The removal of references to Trump’s impeachments from his Smithsonian portrait display seems like a missed opportunity to provide important historical context. However, I can understand the desire to avoid further political controversy.
It will be interesting to see how other museums and cultural institutions handle the presentation of similarly contentious presidential histories in the future.
The Smithsonian’s decision to alter the text accompanying Trump’s portrait raises important questions about the role of museums in documenting and interpreting political history. While objectivity is crucial, it’s also important to acknowledge significant events, even if they are controversial.
I hope the museum will engage with the public and scholars to find the best way to present this material in a balanced and informative manner.
Removing references to Trump’s impeachments from his Smithsonian portrait display seems like a missed opportunity to provide important historical context. But I can understand the museum’s desire to avoid further polarization.
It will be interesting to see if this sets a precedent for how other controversial presidential histories are presented in the future. Objectivity is important, but so is acknowledging significant events.
While I can understand the Smithsonian’s desire to avoid further political divisiveness, removing references to Trump’s impeachments from his portrait display seems like a missed opportunity to provide important historical context.
It will be interesting to see if this sets a precedent for how other controversial presidential histories are presented in museums and cultural institutions going forward.
Interesting that the Smithsonian has removed references to Trump’s impeachments from his portrait display. It’s a complex historical issue that reasonable people may view differently.
I can understand the desire to present a more balanced portrayal, but it’s also important to document the full historical record, even if it’s controversial.
The Smithsonian’s decision to alter the text accompanying Trump’s portrait raises interesting questions about the role of museums in documenting and interpreting political history. Objectivity is important, but so is acknowledging significant events.
I hope the museum will continue to engage with scholars and the public to find the best way to present this material in a balanced and informative manner.
The decision to change the text accompanying Trump’s Smithsonian portrait is a complex one. While avoiding political divisiveness is understandable, it’s crucial that museums document presidential history accurately and transparently.
I hope the museum will continue to engage with scholars and the public to determine the best way to present this sensitive material in a balanced manner.
The decision to alter the accompanying text for Trump’s portrait raises questions about how museums handle politically charged presidential histories. It’s a delicate balance between objectivity and acknowledging key events.
I’m curious to hear more about the museum’s rationale for the change. Was it to avoid further political controversy, or an attempt at a more neutral presentation?
The Smithsonian’s decision to alter the text accompanying Trump’s portrait is a complex issue. On one hand, objectivity is important, but on the other, it’s crucial that museums document presidential history accurately and transparently.
I hope the museum will continue to engage with the public and scholars to determine the best way to present this sensitive material in a balanced manner.