Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Iowa has settled a federal lawsuit with voters who were incorrectly flagged as potential noncitizens before the 2024 presidential election, reaching an agreement that limits the state’s ability to challenge voter eligibility based solely on driver’s license records close to elections.

The settlement, filed Wednesday, prohibits Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate from using transportation department data as the exclusive method for citizenship verification within three months of an election. The agreement comes after several naturalized U.S. citizens sued Pate in October 2024, claiming their voting rights were violated when election workers were instructed to challenge ballots from approximately 2,000 registered voters identified as possible noncitizens.

All five plaintiffs in the case were legally eligible to vote despite being included on the state’s list of suspected noncitizens. The controversy stemmed from Pate’s office comparing voter rolls against Iowa Department of Transportation records showing individuals who had at some point self-identified as noncitizens when obtaining driver’s licenses or identification cards.

“The overwhelming majority of voters wrongly put on this list, including all our clients, are naturalized United States citizens who have the right to vote,” said Rita Bettis Austen, legal director for the ACLU of Iowa, which represented the voters. “We are hopeful today’s settlement will safeguard Iowans from this happening again in future elections.”

A subsequent review of Iowa’s 2024 election revealed only 35 noncitizens voted out of more than 1.6 million ballots cast, with 277 noncitizens registered among nearly 2.3 million total registered voters. The findings underscored what voting rights experts have long maintained – that noncitizen voting in U.S. elections is exceedingly rare.

The settlement stipulates that the 2024 list of flagged voters has been rescinded and cannot be used for any future ballot challenges or voter roll maintenance. In return, the naturalized citizens agreed to drop their claims, though a federal judge still needs to formally accept the agreement.

Pate, a Republican, had initially defended the practice, stating that transportation data was the best available citizenship verification source because his office lacked access to federal immigration records under the Biden administration. However, Iowa has since secured access to the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program through an agreement with President Donald Trump’s Department of Homeland Security.

The SAVE database allows Iowa to verify voters’ citizenship status by cross-checking names, birthdays, and Social Security numbers against federal immigration records. Both Pate and Iowa’s Republican Attorney General Brenna Bird characterized the settlement as a victory, emphasizing the state’s newly established access to federal databases.

“This settlement allows us to continue using the improved tools we now have through the federal SAVE program to maintain the integrity of Iowa’s voter rolls,” Pate said in a statement following the settlement.

The SAVE program has operated for decades under U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, but has undergone significant upgrades during the Trump administration. These enhancements have raised concerns among voting rights advocates, who have filed separate lawsuits over fears that eligible voters could be improperly purged from voter lists.

The Iowa case highlights the tension between efforts to prevent noncitizen voting and protecting the rights of naturalized citizens. Critics argue that last-minute voter challenges disproportionately impact naturalized Americans, potentially discouraging legal voters from participating in elections. Supporters maintain that verification measures are necessary to preserve election integrity.

The settlement represents a compromise between these positions, allowing Iowa to continue citizenship verification through federal databases while preventing eleventh-hour challenges based on potentially outdated state records.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. Isabella White on

    Kudos to the plaintiffs for standing up for their voting rights. Relying too heavily on driver’s license data to challenge citizenship seems like an overly blunt and problematic approach. Glad to see this settled amicably.

  2. Elizabeth H. Thompson on

    Hopefully this settlement sets a positive precedent for how states handle voter eligibility challenges moving forward. Maintaining secure elections is critical, but not at the expense of disenfranchising lawful voters.

  3. Interesting to see Iowa settle this lawsuit over voter eligibility challenges ahead of the 2024 election. It’s important to ensure all eligible voters can cast their ballots without unnecessary obstacles or discrimination.

  4. Elizabeth Brown on

    Comparing voter rolls against DMV records alone seems like an unreliable way to determine citizenship status. Glad they reached a settlement that limits this practice close to elections. Protecting voting rights is crucial for democracy.

    • Jennifer Lopez on

      Agreed. Overly aggressive voter eligibility challenges based on limited data can disenfranchise many legitimate voters. The settlement seems like a reasonable compromise to balance security and access.

  5. Linda Thompson on

    I hope this settlement helps restore faith in the electoral process in Iowa. Eligible citizens should never have their right to vote questioned or threatened based on flawed data or assumptions about their status.

  6. Patricia Lopez on

    This is an important issue to watch as we approach the 2024 election cycle. Ensuring the integrity of our elections while also protecting voting rights for all citizens is a delicate balance.

  7. This is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. I’m glad the parties were able to reach a compromise that balances election security with preserving voting rights. Looking forward to seeing how this plays out in 2024.

  8. Lucas Hernandez on

    It’s good to see Iowa taking steps to address these issues before the next presidential election. Protecting the voting process and the rights of all eligible citizens should be the top priority.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.