Listen to the article
A heated public exchange has erupted between Elon Musk and California Governor Gavin Newsom’s office over Musk’s transgender child, highlighting the growing political tension around transgender rights and policies.
The dispute began when Musk’s America PAC reshared a clip from “The Ezra Klein Show” in which Newsom claimed, “There’s no governor that’s done more pro-trans legislation than I have.” The comment came during a discussion about transgender athletes in women’s sports, an issue where Newsom has recently distanced himself from mainstream Democratic positions.
Newsom had previously made headlines on his podcast, “This is Gavin Newsom,” when he told Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk that it was “deeply unfair” to allow transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports. This stance marked a significant departure from the typical Democratic Party position on the issue.
The conflict escalated when Newsom’s press office responded to America PAC’s post with a personal jab at Musk, writing: “Correct. We’re sorry your daughter hates you, Elon.” The comment referenced Musk’s estranged relationship with his transgender child, who now goes by Vivian Jenna Wilson.
Musk’s response was swift and pointed. He refused to acknowledge Wilson’s gender identity, writing: “I assume you’re referring to my son, Xavier, who has a tragic mental illness caused by the evil woke mind virus you push on vulnerable children. I love Xavier very much and hope he recovers.” He added, “My daughters are Azure, Exa (she goes by Y) and Arcadia, and they do indeed love me very much.”
The Tesla and SpaceX CEO then pinned a post on his X profile stating, “If you have a womb, you are a woman. Otherwise, you are not,” further cementing his position on gender identity.
This public feud highlights Musk’s increasingly vocal stance on transgender issues. In a 2024 interview with Dr. Jordan Peterson, Musk claimed he was “essentially tricked” into giving consent for Wilson to take puberty blockers during the COVID-19 pandemic. “This is before I had any understanding of what was going on,” Musk said. “I was told Xavier might commit suicide if he doesn’t…”
Musk has spoken about the concept of “deadnaming” — referring to a transgender person by their birth name — in stark terms. “I lost my son, essentially. They call it deadnaming for a reason,” he told Peterson. “The reason it’s called ‘deadnaming’ is because your son is dead. So, my son Xavier is dead, killed by the woke mind virus.”
The billionaire entrepreneur, who now owns X (formerly Twitter), has made combating what he terms the “woke mind virus” a personal mission, stating that after his experience with his child, he “vowed to destroy the woke mind virus.”
This exchange occurs amid broader national debates about transgender rights, gender-affirming care for minors, and the participation of transgender athletes in sports. Several states have enacted legislation restricting gender-affirming care for minors and limiting transgender participation in athletics, while others have moved to protect such rights.
The conflict also underscores the increasingly personal nature of political discourse, especially on social media platforms like X, where Musk himself has become a powerful figure in shaping public conversation since his $44 billion acquisition of the platform in 2022.
For Newsom, who has positioned himself as a progressive leader and potential future presidential candidate, his nuanced stance on transgender athletes represents a rare break from progressive orthodoxy, perhaps signaling a recalibration on an issue that has become politically contentious nationwide.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
This dispute highlights the complex intersection of politics, personal identity, and policies around transgender rights. While I understand the strong feelings on both sides, I hope the discussion can stay focused on the merits and avoid descending into partisan mudslinging.
This dispute highlights the challenges of balancing individual rights with the need for fair and equitable policies, especially in high-stakes areas like sports. I hope the parties involved can find a way to engage in good faith and address the substantive issues, rather than resorting to personal attacks.
I’m curious to learn more about the specific policies and research around transgender participation in women’s sports. It seems like a nuanced issue without easy answers. Hopefully the debate can remain civil and evidence-based, rather than devolving into personal attacks.
Interesting to see the political tensions around transgender rights playing out so publicly. I think it’s important to balance protecting individual freedoms with ensuring fair and inclusive policies, especially in high-stakes areas like sports. These are nuanced issues without easy answers.
I agree, these are highly charged and emotional topics. Hopefully the parties involved can find a constructive way to engage and find common ground, rather than resorting to personal attacks.
The transgender athlete debate is a challenging one without simple solutions. I hope the policymakers and stakeholders can approach it objectively and with empathy for all involved. Resorting to personal jabs is unlikely to advance the discussion in a productive way.
This is a complex and sensitive issue. While I appreciate Musk’s candor, I’m not sure it’s helpful to bring his personal family matters into a public debate. Both sides should focus on the substantive policy questions around transgender rights and sports participation.
This is a sensitive and contentious topic, and I can understand the strong emotions on both sides. However, I hope the parties involved can find a way to engage constructively and focus on the substantive policy questions, rather than resorting to personal attacks.
The transgender athlete debate is a complex and polarizing issue. I think it’s important for policymakers to carefully consider the scientific evidence and perspectives of all stakeholders, while also upholding the principles of fairness and inclusion. Personal attacks are unlikely to lead to productive solutions.