Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Socialist Group Condemns US Military Operation in Venezuela, Demands Maduro’s Return to Power

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the nation’s largest socialist organization, has issued a scathing rebuke of the recent U.S. military operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. The couple was apprehended on January 3, 2026, on sweeping narcotics charges as part of what President Donald Trump described as a successful military strike.

In a statement released Saturday, the DSA condemned the operation as “a nakedly imperialist war to install a US puppet government that will give Venezuela’s oil resources over to US corporations and to force US hegemony over Latin America.” The group characterized the action as illegal under both international law and U.S. regulations governing war declarations.

President Trump confirmed that the operation was completed without American casualties or damage to military equipment. During a Saturday press conference at Mar-a-Lago, flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and War Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump praised the military’s execution of the mission, describing U.S. forces as “the strongest and most fearsome military on the planet.”

Maduro, who has ruled Venezuela since 2013, faces accusations of collaborating with cartels and narco gangs throughout South America and Mexico to distribute millions of pounds of cocaine to the United States. The charges against him stem from indictments issued nearly six years ago, alleging drug trafficking and narco-terrorism.

The DSA has rejected these allegations, stating, “There is no substantiated evidence that high-level members of the Venezuelan government are ‘narco-terrorists.'” The group further claimed the operation had “nothing to do with drug trafficking” but was instead “another regime-change war to steal another country’s oil, just like the failed war against Iraq.”

Following the capture, the DSA published a list of seven demands, including the return of Maduro and his wife to Venezuela, an end to the “war on drugs,” termination of all military operations in the Caribbean, and the withdrawal of forces deployed by the U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).

The operation has exposed political fault lines in the United States. Left-wing leaders connected to the DSA, including newly elected New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, have publicly opposed the action. Mamdani revealed he had spoken directly with President Trump to “register my opposition to this act” based on concerns about regime change and violations of international law.

The DSA enjoys support from prominent progressive lawmakers, including Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, who have received the organization’s endorsements in previous elections. However, their positions on this specific military action remain unclear.

Maduro and his wife are currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, with Maduro scheduled for arraignment Monday afternoon. The operation has sparked protests near the White House, with demonstrators rallying against what they perceive as U.S. intervention in Venezuelan affairs.

Republican lawmakers have largely supported the operation. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas praised the action, stating, “Nicolas Maduro wasn’t just an illegitimate dictator; he also ran a vast drug-trafficking operation.”

Meanwhile, moderate Democrats have criticized the administration for failing to notify Congress before the attack, questioning the legal justification for the military action.

The capture represents a significant foreign policy move in Trump’s second term, following his campaign promises to curb the flow of illicit drugs into the United States. Since returning to office, his administration has implemented tariffs on countries like China over fentanyl production and conducted maritime operations targeting suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

13 Comments

  1. As someone focused on the mining and energy sectors, I’m very concerned about the instability in Venezuela and the potential impact on global commodity markets. Restoring the rule of law and democratic governance is crucial, but it must be done through lawful and ethical means, not unilateral military action.

    • I share your perspective. Maintaining the stability and reliability of global commodity supply chains is vital. A peaceful, democratic transition in Venezuela that respects the country’s sovereignty would be the best path forward for all stakeholders.

  2. As an investor focused on mining and commodities, I’m closely watching the Venezuela situation given the country’s vast natural resources. Restoring stability and the rule of law will be critical for the economy and foreign investment. However, I share the DSA’s concerns about the legality and ethics of unilateral US military action.

  3. The DSA’s stance raises important questions about the use of US military force and the principles of national sovereignty. At the same time, Maduro’s authoritarian abuses and the suffering of the Venezuelan people demand a response. I hope a balanced, lawful approach can be found to restore democracy.

    • Isabella S. Lopez on

      I agree the legal and ethical dimensions are complex. Any solution must uphold Venezuela’s sovereignty while also addressing the severe human rights violations and economic collapse under Maduro. It’s a challenging situation with no easy answers.

  4. The situation in Venezuela is extremely complex. I can see valid arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the Venezuelan people deserve a government that respects their rights and addresses the severe economic and humanitarian crises. I hope a just and democratic solution can be found.

    • Oliver Williams on

      You make a fair point. There are no easy answers here. I’m curious to hear more about what kind of democratic transition process the DSA and others believe would be appropriate to resolve the crisis.

  5. Isabella Brown on

    As an investor focused on mining and commodities, I’m closely watching the Venezuela situation given the country’s vast natural resources. Restoring stability and the rule of law will be critical for the economy and foreign investment. I hope a peaceful resolution can be reached.

    • I share your concerns about the economic and investment implications. Venezuela’s mining and energy sectors have immense potential if managed responsibly under a legitimate, democratic government. The current crisis is deeply troubling for the country’s future.

  6. While I understand the DSA’s concerns, I believe Maduro’s authoritarian rule and economic mismanagement have been disastrous for the Venezuelan people. Restoring him to power would only prolong their suffering. A legitimate, democratic transition is needed to address the country’s crises.

    • Michael White on

      I agree that a peaceful, democratic transition is ideal, but the US military operation raises serious legal and ethical questions. Unilateral action to remove a foreign leader is very concerning, regardless of his record.

  7. The DSA’s condemnation of the US military operation raises valid questions about national sovereignty and international law. However, Maduro’s authoritarian abuses and the suffering of the Venezuelan people also demand a response. I hope a balanced, lawful approach can be found to restore democracy.

    • Jennifer Hernandez on

      I agree the legal and ethical issues are complex. Any solution must respect Venezuela’s sovereignty while also addressing the serious human rights violations and economic collapse under Maduro’s rule. It’s a challenging situation with no easy answers.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.