Listen to the article
Federal Appeals Court Blocks New Restrictions on Immigrant Commercial Drivers
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. has temporarily halted new Transportation Department regulations that would severely restrict which immigrants can obtain commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs). The court ruled Thursday that the federal government failed to follow proper procedures when creating the rules and did not adequately explain how the restrictions would improve road safety.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced the restrictions in September, one month after a truck driver not authorized to be in the United States caused a fatal crash in Florida that killed three people. The court noted in its decision that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s own data indicates immigrants holding CDLs represent roughly 5% of all license holders but are involved in only about 0.2% of fatal crashes.
“This is not a ruling on the merits of the case. Secretary Duffy will continue working to keep unqualified, foreign drivers off American roads,” a Transportation Department spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
The court’s decision centered on procedural issues, including whether the Transportation Department properly consulted with states before implementing the new rules. Under the now-suspended regulations, only immigrants holding specific visa categories—H-2a for temporary agricultural workers, H-2b for temporary nonagricultural workers, and E-2 for those making substantial investments in U.S. businesses—would be eligible for commercial licenses.
The proposed restrictions would have dramatically reduced the number of eligible immigrant drivers. Of the approximately 200,000 noncitizens currently holding commercial licenses, only about 10,000 would qualify under the new guidelines. However, existing license holders would be permitted to keep their CDLs until renewal.
Separately, California revoked 17,000 commercial driver’s licenses earlier this week after an audit revealed many immigrants received licenses that remained valid long after their work permits expired. This action was taken under existing regulations, not the new restrictions affected by the court order.
Secretary Duffy has particularly targeted California because the driver involved in the Florida crash received his license there. The driver, Harjinder Singh, appeared in a St. Lucie County, Florida court on Thursday, where his attorneys requested a continuance until January as they prepare for trial. Singh has pleaded not guilty to three counts of vehicular homicide and three counts of manslaughter.
Recent fatal truck crashes involving drivers in the country illegally have intensified scrutiny of CDL issuance policies. In addition to the Florida incident, crashes in Texas, Alabama, and a fiery collision in California last month that killed three people have heightened concerns about licensing standards.
Duffy has claimed that California and five other states improperly issued commercial driver’s licenses to noncitizens, though California is currently the only state facing direct federal action. Reviews of other states have been delayed by the recent government shutdown, but the Transportation Department is urging all states to strengthen their standards.
The Transportation Secretary has already revoked $40 million in federal funding from California, claiming the state isn’t enforcing English language requirements for commercial drivers. He has threatened to withhold an additional $160 million if the state fails to invalidate all improperly issued licenses and address related concerns.
California Governor Gavin Newsom’s office has previously stated that the state followed guidance from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security when issuing licenses to noncitizens. As of Friday, Newsom’s office had not responded to questions about the court ruling.
The trucking industry has generally supported tighter restrictions. Todd Spencer, president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, said: “For too long, loopholes in this program have allowed unqualified drivers onto our highways, putting professional truckers and the motoring public at risk.” A bill currently in Congress would codify the proposed restrictions into law.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This is an interesting development in the ongoing debate around immigration and transportation safety. While the government may have valid concerns, the court seems to have found flaws in the rulemaking process. I’ll be curious to see how this plays out going forward.
Interesting court decision. While road safety is paramount, the data seems to indicate immigrants with CDLs are not a significant source of crashes. Hopefully the Transportation Department can address any legitimate concerns through a more transparent rulemaking process.
Agreed. A balance needs to be struck between safety and fairness. The court’s procedural concerns are valid and should be addressed.
This is a complex issue without easy answers. While road safety is critical, the data doesn’t seem to support the need for such strict new CDL rules targeting immigrants. I hope the government can find a more balanced approach that addresses legitimate concerns without unfairly discriminating.
Restricting immigrant access to CDLs could have significant economic impacts, especially in industries like logistics and transportation that rely on foreign workers. I’m curious to see how this plays out and if the government can justify the new rules on safety grounds.
Good point. The economic implications are an important consideration here beyond just road safety. The government will need to present a compelling case for the new rules.
The court’s decision to temporarily halt the new CDL restrictions for immigrants is reasonable given the lack of clear justification from the Transportation Department. Maintaining high safety standards is important, but the rules should be fair and evidence-based.
Agreed. Any new regulations need to go through proper procedures and have a sound rationale behind them, especially when they could significantly impact certain groups.