Listen to the article
Border Patrol Commander Confronts Rep. Swalwell Over Controversial Christmas Immigration Post
A top U.S. Border Patrol official has publicly criticized Representative Eric Swalwell following the California Democrat’s controversial Christmas social media post depicting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and a helicopter converging on the Nativity scene in Bethlehem.
Swalwell shared an image showing law enforcement seemingly preparing to raid the manger scene, with the caption: “May this be the last Christmas we live this nightmare.” The post, made during the Christmas season, sparked immediate backlash from immigration enforcement officials and conservative commentators.
U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, who has overseen significant immigration enforcement operations for the Department of Homeland Security, responded sharply to Swalwell’s message. “Yes, the last Christmas where un-American pedantic dolts choose illegal aliens over US Citizens,” Bovino wrote on social media.
The commander continued engaging with other users who criticized Swalwell’s post, including agreeing with a woman from Florida who characterized the previous administration’s border policies as “the nightmare” that allowed “in everyone and their grandma.” When another user referenced allegations that Swalwell had a relationship with a suspected Chinese spy—allegations the congressman has denied—Bovino quipped, “Oh yes, how could I forget to mention that.”
The exchange highlights the increasingly polarized debate around immigration enforcement under President Trump’s administration, which has emphasized deportations and stricter border control measures since taking office.
Critics of Swalwell’s post argued that the congressman misrepresented the biblical narrative of the Holy Family. Several commentators noted that according to the Gospel of Luke, Joseph and Mary traveled to Bethlehem to comply with a Roman Empire census requirement, not as unauthorized migrants. Joseph, being a descendant of King David, was returning to his ancestral hometown as required by law.
Conservative activist Robby Starbuck wrote in response to Swalwell: “Mary and Joseph were legal immigrants complying with the rules of the Roman Empire. Rome ordered a census and Joseph had to be counted because Bethlehem was his city; basically the opposite of illegal immigration. Lying about this is Christophobic.”
The biblical account continues that after Jesus’s birth, an angel warned Joseph to flee to Egypt to escape King Herod’s plan to kill the child. This part of the story is frequently cited in immigration debates, with differing interpretations of its relevance to modern policy.
Immigration enforcement advocates often note that Egypt was a province within the Roman Empire at the time, meaning the Holy Family remained within the same political entity rather than crossing international borders as refugees in the modern sense. Others dispute this characterization, arguing the flight to Egypt represents a clear parallel to refugee movements.
The public clash between a high-ranking border enforcement official and a sitting congressman underscores the heightened tensions surrounding immigration policy during the holiday season. It also reflects broader debates about the appropriate use of religious narratives and imagery in political discourse.
This incident occurs against the backdrop of intensified immigration enforcement operations across the country. ICE recently conducted holiday-season arrests of convicted criminals in multiple states, which the agency characterized as delivering “the greatest gift of all” through enhanced public safety.
Swalwell’s office did not respond to requests for comment on the controversy or Commander Bovino’s remarks.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
Immigration is a complex issue with valid arguments on multiple sides. I hope our elected officials can find ways to discuss it constructively and avoid further political grandstanding.
Comparing border enforcement to the Nativity scene seems like a stretch. While immigration is a complex issue, I don’t think trivializing it with holiday imagery is helpful. We need thoughtful, nuanced discussions to find solutions that work for everyone.
This debate highlights how deeply divided the country is on immigration. While I respect the strong views, I hope we can move past political point-scoring and have a rational discussion about the real challenges and trade-offs involved.
This debate highlights the need for greater civility and good-faith engagement on difficult topics like immigration. Resorting to partisan attacks and holiday metaphors is unlikely to lead to meaningful solutions.
The Border Patrol commander’s response seems overly partisan and inflammatory. Both sides need to dial down the rhetoric and focus on facts if we want to make progress on immigration policy.
I agree, the tone from both sides is not constructive. We need more good-faith efforts to understand different perspectives and find common ground.
The Border Patrol commander’s response comes across as defensive and dismissive. A more measured, fact-based approach would likely be more effective at addressing the concerns raised.
It’s troubling to see such heated rhetoric around a sensitive issue like immigration enforcement. Regardless of political affiliation, I think we all want secure borders and humane treatment of migrants. Finding the right balance is the real challenge.
I’m curious to hear more details about the specific enforcement operations and policies being referenced. Facts and data should drive this debate, not partisan posturing or holiday metaphors.
While I can understand the frustration on both sides, making inflammatory comparisons to the Nativity scene seems counterproductive. We need leaders who can bring people together, not drive them further apart.