Listen to the article
Senate Approves Capitol Police Plaque Despite House Opposition
The Senate unanimously approved a resolution Thursday to display a memorial plaque honoring police officers who defended the Capitol during the January 6, 2021 attack, directly challenging House Speaker Mike Johnson’s refusal to install the congressionally mandated tribute.
The bipartisan action came during a brief floor debate where Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina partnered with Democratic Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Alex Padilla of California to ensure the memorial’s placement in the Senate wing until it can be permanently installed.
“A lot of people said it was a dark day for democracy,” Tillis remarked, recalling the thousands of rioters he described as “thugs” who laid siege to the Capitol as Congress was tallying the 2020 election results. “Because of the work of the law enforcement officers, it instead became a great day for democracy. We came back and completed our constitutional duty to certify the election. We owe them eternal gratitude and this nation is stronger because of them.”
The plaque’s absence has become increasingly conspicuous during this week’s fifth anniversary commemorations of the Capitol riot. Congress approved legislation for the memorial over three years ago, with instructions for it to be installed at the Capitol’s West front—where some of the most intense confrontations occurred—by 2023. In response to the official memorial’s absence, many House lawmakers have begun displaying replicas outside their office doors.
The Senate’s action appears partly motivated by concerns about shifting narratives regarding the January 6 events. Former President Donald Trump recently attempted to reframe his role in the attack during a speech where he claimed he only intended for supporters to march peacefully to the Capitol. Additionally, the Trump White House released a report deflecting blame for the deadly riot onto Democrats for Biden’s election victory and onto police for their response.
“It’s so important we be honest with the American people about what happened,” Merkley stated during the floor debate. “It’s so important we recognize those who defended our democratic republic on that day, and that people know we came back, as senators and House members, and finished our work that day, for the peaceful transfer of power.”
Senator Padilla specifically referenced the Trump administration’s recent efforts, characterizing them as “an attempt to rewrite history” that “dishonors” the officers who defended the Capitol. “The Senate bipartisan commitment to real history is strong,” he emphasized.
The dispute highlights ongoing political divisions over the events of January 6. Johnson, who before becoming House Speaker led efforts to object to the 2020 election results, has claimed through his office that the plaque as designed does not comply with the law. Meanwhile, police organizations have filed lawsuits to compel the plaque’s installation as legally required, though the Justice Department is attempting to have those lawsuits dismissed.
Senator Tillis acknowledged certain “technical implementation” concerns, noting the law specified honoring all participating officers, while the physical plaque only lists the various law enforcement agencies that assisted Capitol Police. He indicated there would be a digital component, likely a website, listing all individual officers—numbering in the thousands—who responded that day.
The Senate resolution directs the Architect of the Capitol to “prominently display” the plaque in a “publicly accessible” location within the Senate wing until permanent placement can be arranged. However, displaying the memorial in its intended location at the Capitol’s West front would require agreement with the House, setting up a potential institutional standoff between the two chambers.
This memorial dispute reflects broader national tensions over how to commemorate the January 6 events and recognize the sacrifices of law enforcement personnel who defended democratic institutions during one of the most significant challenges to the peaceful transfer of power in American history.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


8 Comments
The Capitol police officers who defended the building that day deserve our utmost respect and appreciation. I’m glad to see the Senate taking action to ensure the plaque is displayed.
I’m curious to know more about the opposition from the House Speaker. What were the reasons given for refusing to install the congressionally mandated tribute?
That’s a good question. The article doesn’t provide details on the House Speaker’s opposition, so I’m also interested to learn more about the reasoning behind it.
This is an important symbolic gesture to honor the sacrifices made by the Capitol police. I hope the permanent installation can be completed without further delays.
Absolutely. These officers put their lives on the line to uphold the peaceful transfer of power, and they should be properly recognized for their heroism.
While the political divisions around January 6th are still raw, I believe we can all agree that the Capitol police officers who defended the building deserve our gratitude. This plaque is a small but meaningful way to show our appreciation.
It’s good to see the plaque honoring the Capitol police officers finally being displayed. They put their lives on the line that day to protect democracy, and deserve our gratitude and respect.
Agreed. Installing this memorial is an important way to recognize their bravery and commitment to upholding the Constitution.