Listen to the article
X, the social platform owned by Elon Musk, has begun rolling out a new transparency feature called “About this account” designed to help users distinguish between genuine profiles and potentially misleading ones. The feature reveals key background information about accounts, including creation date, location, and how users joined the platform.
In an era where AI-generated accounts have become increasingly sophisticated, X’s new feature aims to give users the tools to verify account authenticity. When accessed, the panel displays details such as the account’s base location, username change history, original join date, and whether the app was downloaded from the App Store or Google Play.
Nikita Bier, X’s head of product, first previewed the feature in October while testing it on his own profile. He described it as a way to “give people enough contextual information to judge whether an account is legitimate or attempting to spread misinformation.” For example, if someone claims to be posting from California but their activity originates overseas, users might have reason to question the account’s authenticity.
The feature has been appearing for more X users over the past week. Bier recently responded to calls for enhanced transparency by promising delivery within 72 hours, a commitment he appears to have kept.
Users can access this new information panel by tapping the “Joined” date on either the web or mobile versions of X. This action opens a page displaying the account’s essential metadata. While the details provided are relatively basic, they offer valuable indicators about whether an account has been recently repurposed or rebranded – common tactics used by those spreading misinformation or engaging in coordinated inauthentic behavior.
Industry analysts note that social media platforms have been under increasing pressure to combat the spread of misinformation, particularly as AI technologies make fake content more convincing and harder to identify. X’s move follows similar efforts by other major platforms like Meta, which implemented comparable transparency features on Instagram several years ago.
“This is a step in the right direction,” says Maya Rodriguez, a digital policy researcher at the Technology Ethics Center. “As generative AI makes it easier to create convincing fake profiles, giving users more context about who they’re interacting with becomes increasingly important.”
The rollout appears to be gradual. According to technology news outlet TechCrunch, many users can currently view their own account data, but the same information isn’t yet visible when checking other profiles. This measured approach likely allows users to verify their information’s accuracy before it becomes publicly viewable.
X has incorporated privacy considerations into the feature. Users maintain control over some displayed information through the Privacy and Safety menu, where they can choose whether to display their specific country or a broader region instead. This flexibility allows individuals to contribute to platform transparency without unnecessarily compromising their personal safety.
The initiative represents one of several changes X has implemented since Musk acquired the platform, formerly known as Twitter, in late 2022. Under his leadership, the company has undergone significant restructuring, including modifications to verification procedures and content moderation approaches.
Social media experts suggest that while the feature may help users make more informed judgments about account authenticity, it will likely need to be part of a more comprehensive strategy to effectively combat misinformation and bot activity on the platform.
As digital impersonation and synthetic media become more sophisticated, platforms face growing challenges in maintaining user trust. X’s new transparency feature attempts to address this by providing additional context about the accounts populating users’ timelines, though its effectiveness in meaningfully reducing misleading content remains to be seen.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


28 Comments
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on X Will Display Account Country of Origin to Combat Misinformation. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward News might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Production mix shifting toward News might help margins if metals stay firm.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.