Listen to the article
The Trump Administration is waging a campaign of misinformation against the UK on energy and climate change issues, according to new analysis presented at the American Geophysical Union’s annual meeting in New Orleans.
Bob Ward, Policy and Communications Director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and Political Science, delivered the findings on December 15, highlighting how certain UK media outlets are enabling the spread of false claims by failing to challenge statements from President Trump and his administration officials.
“The British public expect media organizations and regulators to uphold standards of accuracy, but too often the ideological obsessions of editors are allowed to trump facts,” Ward stated during his presentation titled “Countering the Threat to UK Democracy from Increases in Climate Misinformation.”
The analysis points to a November 2025 interview on GB News where President Trump was permitted to make several demonstrably false claims, including statements that climate change is a hoax and that China has not deployed any wind turbines. In reality, China leads global wind power capacity with over 365 gigawatts installed as of 2024, representing approximately 40% of the world’s total wind energy infrastructure.
Ward criticized the UK’s communications regulator, Ofcom, for failing to take action against GB News despite formal complaints that the interview violated the Broadcasting Code. The code requires broadcasters to ensure news is reported with due accuracy and presented with due impartiality.
The analysis also highlighted misleading statements from Trump’s Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, who falsely claimed during a BBC interview in September that there has been no increase in wildfire activity in the western United States. Scientific data shows that wildfires have significantly increased in frequency, intensity, and duration across western states over the past two decades, with climate change being a key contributing factor.
In a July 2025 article for The Economist, Wright incorrectly suggested that increased North Sea oil and gas production would lower energy bills for British consumers. Energy market analysts have consistently shown that UK consumer energy prices are determined by international markets rather than domestic production levels.
The presentation also targeted the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), the regulator funded by participating newspapers, for its ineffective response to climate misinformation. Ward pointed to an article by Andrew Neil in the Daily Mail from July 2024 that falsely claimed government plans for solar farms would threaten UK food security. In reality, these developments would occupy less than 0.5 percent of the country’s agricultural land.
According to Ward, IPSO acknowledged it lacks the capability to evaluate technical issues, often dismissing them as “a matter of opinion” while refusing to consult subject matter experts when handling complaints.
Energy and climate policy experts note that this wave of misinformation comes at a critical time for the UK, which has legally binding commitments to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Public understanding of climate science and energy policy is essential for maintaining democratic support for the transition to low-carbon energy systems.
“The feebleness of our media regulation is being cynically exploited by President Trump and his administration to target the British public with nonsense claims, such as climate change is a hoax,” Ward concluded, warning that these sustained misinformation campaigns are designed to mislead British citizens about net-zero policies and other climate initiatives, ultimately undermining the UK’s democratic processes.
The findings underscore growing concerns about the international dimensions of climate misinformation and the challenges facing democratic societies in maintaining fact-based public discourse on critical environmental issues.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
The report highlights an alarming trend of climate misinformation being amplified through certain media channels. It’s crucial for outlets to uphold journalistic integrity and fact-check claims, rather than allowing ideological biases to take precedence over the truth.
Absolutely, the media has a responsibility to provide accurate, well-researched information to the public, not amplify disinformation. Fact-checking and challenging false claims should be a top priority.
The report on the Trump administration’s tactics to spread climate misinformation in the UK is troubling. The media’s responsibility to provide accurate, well-researched information to the public is paramount, and they must do better at fact-checking and countering false claims, regardless of the source.
This is a concerning development, with the Trump administration seemingly targeting the UK in its climate misinformation campaign. It’s troubling to see media outlets failing to counter demonstrably false claims. Robust fact-checking and journalistic integrity are essential to combat the spread of misinformation.
This is a worrying development, with the former US administration seemingly attempting to undermine the UK’s climate policies and public understanding through the spread of misinformation. The media must uphold its duty to the public by rigorously fact-checking claims and not amplifying demonstrably false information.
The report on the Trump administration’s climate misinformation campaign targeting the UK is deeply concerning. It’s crucial that the media fulfills its role as a watchdog by challenging false claims and upholding journalistic integrity, rather than allowing ideological biases to compromise accuracy and truth.
The spread of climate misinformation is a serious threat to public understanding and policymaking. It’s alarming to see the Trump administration actively targeting the UK with these tactics. The media must do better at upholding standards of accuracy and challenging false claims, regardless of the source.
Absolutely. The media has a crucial role to play in separating fact from fiction, especially on critical issues like climate change. Allowing unchecked misinformation to be amplified is a disservice to the public.
This report highlights the need for stronger media accountability and fact-checking, especially when it comes to claims made by high-profile figures like the former US president. Allowing the spread of demonstrably false information undermines public discourse and threatens progress on important issues like climate change.
Fascinating to see the Trump administration’s tactics to spread climate misinformation, even targeting the UK. It’s concerning how some media outlets can enable the spread of falsehoods by not challenging blatantly false claims. Accountability and fact-checking are crucial.
It’s deeply concerning to see the Trump administration actively targeting the UK with climate misinformation. The media must be vigilant in challenging false claims and upholding journalistic integrity, rather than letting ideological biases take precedence over the facts.