Listen to the article
The Fiji Military Forces Acknowledges Misinformation in Death Case, Minister Tabuya Confirms
Fiji’s Minister for Information Lynda Tabuya has commended the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF) for taking responsibility after releasing incorrect information regarding the death of Jone Vakarisi, who died while being questioned at Queen Elizabeth Barracks.
“I thank the RFMF. They actually took responsibility for what you would call misinformation, which is unintentional, but is out there anyway,” Tabuya stated, addressing the military’s handling of the sensitive case that has drawn significant public attention.
The controversy began when the RFMF issued an initial statement characterizing Vakarisi’s death as a “sudden medical emergency” that occurred during questioning. However, the military later released a second statement revising their account of the events. Following investigations, the Fiji Police Force has since classified the case as a murder investigation, marking a significant shift in how authorities are approaching the incident.
Tabuya emphasized that government intervention in the matter proved unnecessary, praising the RFMF leadership for their transparency. “Government did not have to do it. I thank the Commander, Major-General Ro Jone Kalouniwai for taking responsibility and coming back out to correct the misinformation in the first press release, so that we didn’t have to do it,” she said.
The case highlights the delicate relationship between Fiji’s military, police force, and civilian government, which has evolved significantly since the country’s return to democratic rule. Fiji has experienced several military coups in its history, with the most recent in 2006 leading to eight years of military government before democratic elections in 2014.
The Information Minister also took the opportunity to clarify the operational independence of the RFMF’s communications structure. “Operationally, the RFMF is separate from the Ministry of Information. They are able to put out their own statements on their operations,” Tabuya explained, underscoring the institutional separation between the military and civilian government communications channels.
This case comes at a time when Fiji’s current government, led by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka since December 2022, has been working to reform institutions and restore confidence in democratic processes. Rabuka, who led Fiji’s first coup in 1987 but has since embraced democratic principles, heads a coalition government that ended the 16-year rule of former Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama.
The handling of Vakarisi’s case may be viewed as a test of Fiji’s institutional accountability and transparency under the new administration. Human rights organizations in the Pacific have frequently called for greater oversight of security forces and better protections for those in custody.
While the Minister expressed satisfaction with how the RFMF handled the correction of information, the reclassification of Vakarisi’s death as murder raises serious questions about what actually occurred at the military barracks. Police investigations are continuing, with authorities yet to release detailed findings about the circumstances surrounding Vakarisi’s death.
The case has drawn attention from Fiji’s civil society organizations, which have advocated for greater accountability from security forces in recent years. The outcome of the investigation could have significant implications for military protocols and civilian oversight mechanisms in the country.
Minister Tabuya concluded by stating that the public now has “a clearer picture of the situation,” though many details remain undisclosed as the police investigation continues. The government has not indicated whether it will implement any changes to protocols regarding military detention or questioning procedures in light of this incident.
The case continues to develop as police investigators work to determine exactly what happened to Jone Vakarisi and who might be responsible for his death.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
It’s encouraging to see the RFMF take responsibility for the initial misinformation. Handling sensitive issues like this properly is crucial for maintaining credibility and public confidence.
The mining and metals sectors have seen a lot of scrutiny lately regarding transparency and accountability. This case highlights the importance of proactive communication, even when information is still unfolding.
Indeed, public trust is paramount, especially for industries like mining that have faced controversies. Owning up to missteps and correcting the record is the right approach.
Glad to see the RFMF taking responsibility and correcting the misinformation. Transparency is important for public trust, especially in sensitive cases like this. Curious to see how the investigation unfolds and what the final conclusions are.
Agreed, accountability and transparency are crucial. It’s good the government didn’t have to intervene, showing the RFMF’s willingness to address the issue directly.