Listen to the article
Elections officials across the nation are facing unprecedented pressures as the 2024 election season intensifies, with rising incidents of harassment, threats, and intimidation driven largely by persistent misinformation about election processes.
In Pima County, Arizona, Recorder Gabriella Cázares-Kelly reports an alarming uptick in confrontational behavior toward her staff. “We’ve had people follow our employees to their cars, photograph their license plates, and even track down their home addresses,” she said during a recent press briefing. Her office has been forced to implement new security protocols, including escorting employees to parking areas and installing additional surveillance systems.
The situation mirrors a troubling national trend. According to a recent survey by the Brennan Center for Justice, nearly one in three election officials have experienced harassment, threats, or abuse related to their jobs since 2020. More than 60% expressed concern about interference from political leaders in future elections.
“What we’re seeing now represents a fundamental shift in how elections administrators are treated,” explains David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research. “These are typically career civil servants who have worked across multiple administrations, regardless of political party, and suddenly they find themselves targeted.”
Much of the hostility stems from unfounded claims about election security and voter fraud that gained traction during and after the 2020 presidential election. Despite numerous audits, court rulings, and investigations finding no evidence of widespread fraud, misinformation continues to circulate widely on social media platforms and certain news outlets.
In Wisconsin’s Dane County, Clerk Scott McDonell has implemented crisis response training for his staff. “We’ve had to divert resources away from actual election administration to address security concerns,” McDonell said. “That’s time and money that should be going toward ensuring smooth voting experiences for our citizens.”
The consequences extend beyond emotional and psychological toll. A significant exodus of experienced election officials has created critical knowledge gaps in election offices nationwide. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission estimates that nearly 30% of election administrators have left their positions since 2020, with many citing harassment as a primary factor.
“We’re losing decades of institutional knowledge at precisely the moment when elections are becoming more complex and scrutinized,” says Tammy Patrick, senior advisor to the Democracy Fund. “Training new staff takes time, and there’s no substitute for the experience that’s walking out the door.”
In response, several states have enacted legislation to protect election workers. Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have passed laws making it illegal to dox election officials or threaten them with violence. At the federal level, the Department of Justice launched an Election Threats Task Force in 2021, which has pursued cases against individuals making credible threats to election personnel.
Despite these challenges, election officials remain committed to their mission. In Georgia’s Fulton County, which faced intense scrutiny after 2020, Director of Registration and Elections Nadine Williams emphasizes transparency as a key strategy. “We’ve expanded observer access, added cameras in ballot processing areas, and conducted more public demonstrations of our equipment and procedures,” she explained. “Transparency is our best defense against misinformation.”
Cybersecurity experts stress that American election systems remain fundamentally secure, with paper ballot backups, post-election audits, and decentralized administration providing multiple layers of protection. “The irony is that our elections have never been more secure or better administered,” notes Matt Masterson, former senior cybersecurity advisor at the Department of Homeland Security. “Yet public confidence has been systematically undermined.”
As the 2024 election approaches, officials are calling for a more measured public discourse around election administration. “Questions and oversight are essential in a democracy,” says Cázares-Kelly. “But there’s a vast difference between legitimate inquiry and harassment based on conspiracy theories.”
For voters concerned about election integrity, experts recommend becoming poll workers, attending public demonstrations of voting equipment, or participating in post-election audits—all constructive ways to understand the numerous safeguards built into America’s electoral system.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


11 Comments
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward News might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on Election Workers Under Pressure as Misinformation Fuels Threats and Incidents. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.