Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Rape Crisis England & Wales Refutes Misinformation About Organization and Self-Swab Kits

Rape Crisis England & Wales (RCEW) has issued a formal response addressing what it describes as “inaccurate information” published by a community interest company that sells self-swab ‘rape kits.’ The statement comes amid growing concern that misinformation could discourage sexual assault survivors from seeking proper support.

According to RCEW CEO Ciara Bergman, the organization contacted the company on October 10 to request correction or removal of inaccurate claims on their website, but no action has been taken. The company, identified as ‘Enough,’ markets £20 self-swab kits primarily to university students and on social media platforms.

“We’re concerned that this misinformation could discourage survivors from coming forward for support,” Bergman stated in the comprehensive response.

Among the inaccuracies RCEW addressed was the claim that there are 38 Rape Crisis centers in the country. RCEW clarified that there are currently 36 centers across England and Wales that fall under their umbrella, with additional centers operating independently in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

The organization also rejected Enough’s financial assertions that “Rape Crisis receives about £70m in funding.” According to RCEW, its national organization operates on less than £5 million annually, while the combined income of all member centers totals approximately £40 million—significantly below the claimed figure. RCEW emphasized that these centers face “severe and longstanding underfunding, relative to need.”

Particularly concerning to the organization was Enough’s claim that the “cost per person helped is about £400” with survivors receiving “about 2.3 hours of personal contact time, at a cost of £180 per hour.” RCEW categorically rejected these calculations, stating they are “unable to determine how they’ve been made or what they are based on.”

“Every Rape Crisis Centre offers substantially more contact time than 2.3 hours per survivor,” the statement emphasized. “We wish to assure survivors that the ‘cost’ of supporting them is, to us, irrelevant. What matters more is that every person who needs our help feels able to come forward.”

The statement also addressed Enough’s assertion that “85% of survivors choose not to access Rape Crisis Centres,” pointing out that since most sexual assault survivors never report their experiences, it is “impossible to calculate how many survivors there are, what proportion come to Rape Crisis, or what the specific reasons for this are.”

Beyond correcting organizational misrepresentations, RCEW outlined substantial concerns about self-swab rape kits, noting there are “no known cases in which DNA evidence obtained by a self-swab kit has been ruled admissible in a criminal trial in the UK.”

The organization highlighted several limitations of self-swab kits, including their limited ability to detect only the number and sex of DNA profiles without identifying whose DNA it is or its location on the body. RCEW stressed that Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) provide more comprehensive services free of charge, including injury treatment, STI testing, and emergency contraception.

RCEW’s position is aligned with numerous health and legal authorities, including NHS England, the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Victim Support, and the incoming Victims Commissioner for England & Wales.

“Self-collected evidence gathered at home and sent in the post is highly vulnerable to loss, contamination and damage,” the statement warned, adding that survivors who use such kits may miss the critical forensic window for proper evidence collection if they later discover limitations in the self-swab approach.

RCEW emphasized that its concerns were developed independently, contrary to Enough’s claim that the organization opposed the kits “in solidarity” with other groups. The statement concludes by reaffirming RCEW’s commitment to supporting survivors through its 24/7 Support Line, which is available to anyone over 16 in England or Wales who has experienced sexual harm at any point in their lives.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Isabella Thomas on

    It’s concerning to see misinformation being spread about vital rape crisis services. I hope the organization is able to quickly correct the inaccuracies and ensure survivors get the support they need without confusion.

    • William Hernandez on

      Absolutely, providing accurate information and debunking myths is so important for survivors to feel safe accessing these services.

  2. While the self-swab kits may seem like a convenient option, they cannot replace the comprehensive support and services offered by legitimate rape crisis centers. I’m glad RCEW is working to correct the misinformation.

    • Robert Hernandez on

      You make a good point. Professional support and guidance is so vital for survivors, and these kits could provide a false sense of security if not accompanied by proper resources.

  3. Michael Rodriguez on

    While self-swab kits may seem like a convenient option, they cannot replace the comprehensive care and guidance offered by legitimate rape crisis centers. I’m glad RCEW is working to correct the misleading claims and ensure survivors get the support they need.

    • Absolutely. Accurate information and access to professional services are crucial for survivors, so I commend RCEW for taking action to address this misinformation.

  4. It’s disappointing to see a company seemingly trying to profit off of this sensitive issue by spreading inaccurate claims. I hope RCEW’s response helps clarify the true nature and scope of their services.

    • Agreed, profiteering off of sexual assault survivors is highly unethical. Kudos to RCEW for taking action to protect vulnerable individuals.

  5. This is a sensitive and important issue. I appreciate RCEW taking the time to formally address the inaccurate claims and clarify the true scope of their organization and services. Providing survivors with reliable information is critical.

    • Michael B. Martinez on

      Well said. Survivors deserve access to legitimate, professional support without the added burden of misinformation. RCEW’s response is an important step in the right direction.

  6. Isabella N. Smith on

    Rape crisis services play a vital role in supporting survivors, so it’s crucial that the public has access to factual information. I’m glad RCEW is working to correct the misinformation and ensure survivors get the help they need.

    • William Hernandez on

      Absolutely, transparency and accuracy around these services is so important. Kudos to RCEW for their commitment to setting the record straight.

  7. This is an important issue, and I appreciate the organization taking steps to address the misinformation. Accurate data and clarity around available resources are crucial for sexual assault survivors.

    • Elizabeth Garcia on

      Agreed. Discouraging survivors from seeking help could have devastating consequences, so setting the facts straight is the responsible thing to do.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.