Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Doctors Increasingly Addressing Harm from Online Health Misinformation, CMA Survey Finds

Nearly all Canadian physicians have had to intervene to prevent harm or address consequences after patients followed false health information found online, according to a new survey by the Canadian Medical Association (CMA).

The Physician Pulse survey, published Tuesday, reveals that 97 percent of the 645 responding doctors reported having to address harm caused by patients acting on misleading health information, including content generated by artificial intelligence.

“When individuals are unable to access care in a timely fashion, they will go online to seek health information,” Dr. Margot Burnell, medical oncologist and president of the CMA, said in an interview. “We know from previous studies released within the past year that those individuals that follow advice from online sources are at a five-times increased risk of reporting self-harm.”

This troubling trend comes as the vast majority of Canadians turn to the internet for medical guidance. According to the CMA’s 2026 Health and Media Tracking Survey published in February, 89 percent of 5,000 responding Canadians reported going online for health information.

While exposure to false health information has increased across all age groups from 2024 to 2025, the most notable rise was among baby boomers. However, younger Canadians—specifically Generation Z and millennials—are more likely to use AI to diagnose and treat health issues. Google and ChatGPT were identified as the most commonly used platforms for health information.

Dr. Burnell explained that online health searches can sometimes lead patients down dangerous paths. In one case, she noted a family doctor who treated a patient whose skin rash worsened after following online advice to apply a topical steroid cream. In other instances, patients become unnecessarily alarmed about common illnesses when symptoms persist longer than generic online information suggests.

“If they went in and discussed it with their family doctor, who knows the community and has seen lots of individuals, then they may say: ‘No, this particular virus is going around and it tends to last much longer than the typical virus,'” Burnell explained.

The root cause of Canadians’ reliance on online health information appears to be the nationwide shortage of healthcare providers. A CMA study published in January 2025 identified a need for nearly 23,000 more family physicians in Canada—representing a 49 percent increase from current numbers. The shortage extends across healthcare professions, with Canada requiring 14,000 more licensed practical nurses, 2,700 more nurse practitioners, 28,000 more registered nurses, 500 more registered psychiatric nurses, and 2,000 more occupational therapists.

Despite federal, provincial, and territorial health ministers meeting in Calgary in October 2025 to discuss improvements to the healthcare system, the CMA criticized these discussions for missing “an opportunity” to deliver meaningful solutions.

The CMA survey underscores that while Canadians recognize the potential inaccuracy of online health information, most continue to rely on it due to difficulties accessing professional healthcare advice. Long wait times to see specialists and family doctors drive many patients to seek immediate answers online, a situation exacerbated by disconnected healthcare systems and administrative barriers that hinder effective communication between healthcare professionals.

To address these challenges, the CMA and provincial medical associations are meeting with parliamentarians and senators in Ottawa this week to discuss strategies for combating health misinformation. They will also focus on reducing administrative burdens through digital tools, improving access to team-based primary care, supporting Indigenous-led approaches to health equity, and streamlining the licensing process for internationally trained health professionals.

The CMA has already launched its “Healthcare For Real” initiative to make accurate health information more accessible to the public. “There are reputable sources online, but we need to identify those,” Burnell said. “We really need to educate our public, not only about health literacy, but also digital literacy.”

She advises Canadians to carefully scrutinize online health information: “Be very cautious on the information that you’ve obtained, and be curious where that information has come from. Who has put the information online? Are they reputable? Can it be validated? Can you find it in an academic setting?”

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Elijah Smith on

    It’s encouraging to see the medical community taking this issue seriously. Ongoing collaboration between doctors, regulators, and tech platforms will be key to making progress.

    • Elijah Rodriguez on

      Absolutely. A multi-stakeholder approach is essential to effectively tackling the complex challenge of online health misinformation.

  2. Emma S. Davis on

    Kudos to the CMA for shedding light on this critical issue. I hope their findings and recommendations will inspire meaningful action to protect patients from the harms of online misinformation.

  3. Patricia Rodriguez on

    The statistic about a 5-times increased risk of self-harm for those following online health advice is quite alarming. This underscores the vital role doctors play in combating dangerous misinformation.

    • Elijah Williams on

      You’re right, that stat is very concerning. Doctors must remain vigilant and proactive in educating patients on reliable health information sources.

  4. With 89% of Canadians turning to the internet for medical guidance, the need for doctors to address online misinformation is clearly paramount. Kudos to the CMA for this important initiative.

  5. Linda Jackson on

    It’s good to see Canadian doctors taking a proactive stance against health misinformation online. Patients need reliable, science-based guidance, especially in this age of rampant digital disinformation.

    • Absolutely, misinformation can lead to very real, serious consequences for people’s health and well-being. Kudos to the CMA for addressing this critical issue.

  6. While this report focuses on Canada, I imagine similar trends are playing out globally. The medical community worldwide must unite to address this growing public health crisis.

  7. Jennifer Taylor on

    Equipping doctors with the tools and resources to combat health misinformation is a critical step. Hopefully this report will inspire other medical associations to follow suit.

    • Jennifer Hernandez on

      Agreed. Coordinated efforts by the medical community are essential to combat the growing threat of online health misinformation.

  8. Linda Y. Hernandez on

    While addressing the consequences of misinformation is important, I hope the CMA is also focused on proactive education to prevent patients from being misled in the first place.

    • Good point. Preventative measures like patient education campaigns could be very impactful in this fight against online health misinformation.

  9. Lucas Williams on

    This report highlights the critical need for improved digital health literacy among the general public. Doctors can’t be expected to shoulder the entire burden of combating misinformation.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.