Listen to the article
Vancouver Mayor Maintains He Apologized for False Drug Distribution Claims Against Councillor
Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim repeatedly insisted Friday that he has apologized to Councillor Sean Orr after it emerged that Sim was the source of false allegations accusing Orr of distributing illegal drugs on Christmas Day.
The controversy erupted earlier this week when a video circulated showing Councillor Lenny Zhou claiming that “some non-ABC councillors are drug users themselves” and that “on Christmas Eve, they openly distributed drugs.” Zhou subsequently apologized for these remarks, with Sim quickly accepting the apology and acknowledging that Zhou had taken “responsibility for sharing information that was not accurate.”
However, a second video later revealed that Mayor Sim himself had originated the false claim during a February 6 briefing with Chinese-language media. Sitting directly beside Councillor Zhou, Sim stated: “We have a councillor, Sean Orr. Just this Christmas, he was handing out illegal drugs on Christmas Day to people on the streets.”
When confronted by reporters on Friday about his role in spreading the misinformation, Sim repeatedly offered the same response: “I spoke with Coun. Orr yesterday and I apologized for my comments.” The mayor declined to provide evidence for his original accusation or address whether his actions as a civic leader were irresponsible, instead reiterating several times that he had apologized to Councillor Orr.
For his part, Orr acknowledged that Sim had called him but said he wasn’t ready to accept the apology. “This makes it difficult for all of us to do our jobs. For all of council,” Orr told 1130 NewsRadio. “I think Vancouver wants to see a council that is pragmatic, that works together on issues. I don’t think they like to see this kind of polarization.”
Orr described the allegations as “character assassination” and compared them to tactics used by American far-right politicians. He expressed particular concern about the impact on Vancouver’s image, saying, “It makes Vancouver look bad on the world stage. We need a leader — a mayor — who brings people together.”
The councillor also criticized the exploitation of “legitimate anxieties” within the Chinese community and called on both Sim and Zhou to retract their statements through the same media channels where they made the original claims.
Beyond the political fallout, Orr emphasized that such allegations distract from meaningful discussion about drug use and harm reduction. “This just furthers the kind of stigma that people are facing,” he said. “Lying about this subject ultimately leads to people dying, leads to people feeling shame and using alone… That’s why we’re in this position, where 400 people are dying a year.”
While Orr acknowledged that an apology was the “bare minimum” required, he expressed doubt that City Hall’s integrity commissioner has sufficient power to enforce accountability, particularly given that the governing ABC Party seems unlikely to sanction its own members. When asked about potential legal action, Orr stated he was “considering all my options.”
Vancouver criminal defense lawyer Michael Shapray outlined potential legal avenues available to Orr, including civil litigation for slander, libel, and defamation to recover damages. Shapray also mentioned the possibility, though rare, of filing a criminal complaint for defamatory libel.
“Those types of allegations are serious. They were public, they were published. They were said out loud, and they could have damaging impacts on the people they were about,” Shapray explained. “So I think there is the risk of culpability and liability if it turns out that the statements are proven to have been false and that they did cause damage to reputations.”
As the controversy continues to unfold, it raises significant questions about political accountability, public discourse on drug policy, and the responsibility of elected officials to provide accurate information to constituents.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


11 Comments
The mayor’s actions are concerning and undermine public trust. He needs to take responsibility, apologize sincerely, and outline concrete steps to prevent similar lapses in judgment in the future.
Spreading unverified claims about illegal activity is a serious breach of public trust. The mayor should provide a full explanation, apologize, and outline specific actions to regain the community’s confidence.
This raises important questions about the mayor’s judgment and decision-making process. Fact-checking and due diligence should be a top priority for any elected official making public statements.
Well said. Elected leaders must uphold high standards of integrity and be accountable to the community they serve.
This is a troubling development that highlights the importance of fact-checking and due diligence, even for high-ranking officials. The mayor must address this issue head-on and demonstrate a commitment to honesty and transparency.
This is a concerning situation. The mayor should be held accountable for spreading misinformation, even if he later apologized. Transparent and ethical governance is crucial for public trust.
Irresponsible accusations like these can have serious consequences. The mayor needs to explain his actions and regain the community’s confidence through honest, fact-based leadership.
I agree. Spreading unverified claims, especially about illegal activities, is a serious breach of public trust. The mayor must address this transparently and take responsibility.
Responsible governance requires leaders to uphold the highest ethical standards. The mayor’s actions in this case raise concerning questions that he must address transparently and with accountability.
This situation underscores the need for elected officials to be vigilant about the accuracy and integrity of their statements. The mayor should take immediate steps to rectify this issue and restore public trust.
Misinformation and false allegations can be very damaging, especially when coming from a position of authority. The mayor should provide a full explanation and commit to more transparent, ethical governance going forward.