Listen to the article
Elon Musk testified Wednesday in a San Francisco federal court where shareholders have accused him of manipulating Twitter’s stock price through misleading statements before his $44 billion acquisition of the platform in 2022.
The lawsuit, filed in October 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, represents Twitter shareholders who sold their stock between May 13 and October 4, 2022. Plaintiffs claim Musk deliberately made false public statements “carefully calculated to drive down the price of Twitter stock” in violation of federal securities laws.
Musk, appearing in a black suit and tie, faced questioning about his communications regarding Twitter stock purchases and his subsequent deal to take the company private. The Tesla CEO initially reached an agreement to acquire Twitter in April 2022, but on May 13, he tweeted that the deal was “temporarily on hold” pending verification of spam and fake account numbers.
The plaintiffs’ attorney, Aaron P. Arnzen, extensively questioned Musk about this pivotal tweet. Following Musk’s announcement, Twitter’s stock plummeted nearly 10% in a single day. When asked if he considered the potential market impact of his statement, Musk repeatedly insisted, “I was simply speaking my mind.”
Musk defended his characterization of the deal being “on hold” by comparing it to being late for a meeting, claiming it didn’t mean he wouldn’t complete the transaction. He emphasized that he had made his continued commitment to the acquisition explicit.
The lawsuit highlights that nothing in the merger agreement permitted Musk to unilaterally place the deal “on hold,” making his statement materially false according to the plaintiffs.
In the weeks following his May 13 tweet, Musk continued making statements that raised doubts about the transaction. By July 2022, he announced his intention to abandon the deal, citing Twitter’s alleged failure to provide sufficient information about fake accounts. This announcement sent Twitter’s stock price to $36.81 per share – 32% below Musk’s offer price of $54.20.
During his testimony, Musk acknowledged he didn’t inquire about Twitter’s methodology for determining fake account numbers before waiving due diligence in his “take it or leave it” offer. “I assumed if Twitter put something in an SEC filing, it would be accurate,” Musk testified, later adding, “It subsequently turned out they misrepresented the number of bots. They lied.”
The lawsuit contends that Musk’s statements were part of a deliberate scheme to either renegotiate a lower price or delay the merger, constituting market manipulation and securities law violations.
The dispute over Twitter’s bot and fake account prevalence wasn’t new to the platform. The company had previously paid $809.5 million in 2021 to settle claims it overstated growth metrics. Twitter had also consistently disclosed its bot estimates to the SEC, while cautioning that its figures might underestimate the actual numbers.
The legal saga culminated in Twitter suing Musk to enforce the agreement, with Musk filing a countersuit. Ultimately, on October 4, 2022, Musk agreed to proceed with the original $44 billion purchase, finalizing the deal later that month. Following the acquisition, he implemented sweeping changes, including significant workforce reductions, dismantling the trust and safety team, relaxing content moderation policies, and eventually rebranding Twitter as X in July 2023.
This isn’t Musk’s first defense against allegations of misleading investors through social media. Three years earlier, he spent approximately eight hours testifying in a similar San Francisco federal trial regarding statements about a potential Tesla buyout at $420 per share – a deal that never materialized. In that case, a jury cleared Musk of wrongdoing.
The current trial continues as shareholders seek compensation for alleged losses resulting from what they characterize as Musk’s calculated market manipulation during the tumultuous acquisition process.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
Allegations of stock manipulation are always taken seriously, especially for a high-profile figure like Musk. The court proceedings will shed light on whether his Twitter statements were truly misleading or just typical Musk showmanship.
Elon Musk is no stranger to controversy, and this lawsuit over Twitter stock manipulation is just the latest example. The outcome could have major implications for how CEOs communicate about their companies going forward.
Musk’s history of provocative social media behavior is well known. This lawsuit will determine if that crossed into securities law violations or if it was just business as usual for the Tesla and Twitter leader.
Exactly. Musk’s tweets often move markets, so the court will have to scrutinize whether he deliberately used that influence to manipulate Twitter’s stock price.
This lawsuit highlights the challenges CEOs face in balancing transparency, hype, and regulatory compliance when dealing with high-profile companies and acquisitions. The court will have to weigh all the evidence carefully.
Agreed. Musk’s public persona can sometimes blur the line between enthusiasm and market-moving statements. The courts will need to establish if any laws were broken here.
Musk’s testimony will be key in determining if he intentionally made misleading statements to drive down Twitter’s stock price. Careful analysis of the evidence and his communications will be crucial in this case.
Elon Musk’s tendency to make bold public statements is well known. Curious to see if the court finds evidence of intentional stock manipulation or if this was simply another example of his unfiltered communication style.
Given Musk’s penchant for stirring things up, I’m not surprised he’s facing a lawsuit over alleged stock manipulation. The courts will have to weigh the evidence and determine if any laws were broken.
Interesting to see Musk testifying over alleged stock manipulation. While his tweets can certainly move markets, it’s important he follows disclosure rules. Hope the court can get to the bottom of this and provide clarity.
It’s a complex situation where Musk’s outspoken nature clashes with securities regulations. The lawsuit will test whether his tweets crossed the line into illegal stock manipulation or were simply par for the course for an eccentric CEO.