Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Phoenix-area cardiology practice pays $4.75 million to settle fraud allegations involving unnecessary procedures

A Phoenix-area cardiology practice and three of its physicians have agreed to pay $4.75 million to resolve allegations that they performed unnecessary medical procedures and falsified medical records to justify billing federal healthcare programs, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

The settlement involves Tri-City Cardiology, which operates offices in Chandler, Mesa, and Gilbert, along with physicians Jaskamal Kahlon, Joshua D. Cohen, and Marc J. Berkowitz. Federal prosecutors accused the practice and doctors of violating the False Claims Act by billing Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and the Department of Veterans Affairs for medically unnecessary vein ablation procedures over a five-year period from January 2017 to April 2022.

Vein ablations use heat to seal damaged veins, such as varicose veins, but according to the government, the physicians performed these procedures on patients who did not meet accepted medical standards for treatment.

In announcing the settlement, Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate emphasized the ethical obligations of healthcare providers. “Physicians should not prioritize profit over patient needs,” Shumate said. “Medicare and other federal programs pay only for medical care that meets accepted standards, and the falsification of medical records undermines efforts to assess whether medical care was appropriate.”

The DOJ alleged that the defendants falsified documentation regarding blood flow duration, vein diameter, and patient symptoms to make the procedures appear medically necessary when they weren’t.

Tri-City Cardiology has firmly denied any wrongdoing. In a statement responding to the settlement, the practice said: “We strongly disagree with the government’s allegations and unequivocally deny that our physicians knowingly submitted false claims or performed medically unnecessary procedures.” The group maintains that care was provided in accordance with the 2020 Appropriate Use Criteria and Medicare’s “reasonable and necessary” standard in effect at that time.

The cardiology practice also pointed out that there were no allegations of patient harm or complaints, and that the practice remains fully eligible to participate in Medicare and all federal healthcare programs. According to Tri-City, the decision to settle was made to avoid prolonged litigation costs and to maintain focus on patient care.

U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine for the District of Arizona highlighted the broader impact of healthcare fraud on federal programs. “When medical providers do not respect the difference between [necessary and unnecessary care] and bill in the interest of their own bottom line instead of their patients, the United States Attorney’s Office has pursued and will continue to pursue appropriate recoveries to protect taxpayer funds,” Courchaine stated.

Healthcare fraud cases involving medically unnecessary procedures have been an enforcement priority for federal authorities in recent years. Such cases not only represent financial fraud against taxpayer-funded programs but can potentially put patients at risk by subjecting them to invasive procedures without proper medical justification.

The financial terms of the settlement specify that $4.6 million will go to the federal government, with $2.3 million designated as federal restitution. The state of Arizona will receive $144,000, with approximately $72,000 earmarked for restitution.

This case highlights ongoing concerns about potential overtreatment in the U.S. healthcare system, where fee-for-service payment models can create financial incentives for providing more services rather than focusing solely on medical necessity and patient outcomes.

The settlement with Tri-City Cardiology represents one of several recent enforcement actions targeting cardiology practices nationwide for alleged Medicare fraud involving unnecessary procedures.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

12 Comments

  1. This is a significant recovery for taxpayers. Healthcare fraud can drain valuable resources from vital public programs. Rigorous oversight and enforcement are crucial.

    • Michael R. Thomas on

      Agreed. The $4.75 million penalty should sting, but it’s just as important that these doctors face consequences for their unethical actions.

  2. Elizabeth Martinez on

    This settlement highlights the importance of robust auditing and oversight mechanisms to catch these kinds of fraudulent billing practices early on.

    • Elijah Jackson on

      Yes, proactive monitoring and data analysis are crucial to identify outlier trends and suspicious patterns of care. Catching these issues quickly is key.

  3. Amelia Jackson on

    Glad to see the DOJ holding this cardiology practice accountable for fraudulent billing practices. Unnecessary medical procedures are a serious abuse of public healthcare programs.

    • William Martinez on

      Absolutely. Patients deserve quality, ethical care, not procedures just to pad profits. This settlement sends a strong message.

  4. James Garcia on

    I’m curious to know more about the specific standards and guidelines that were violated here. What are the accepted medical criteria for vein ablation procedures?

    • Mary Martinez on

      That’s a good question. The article mentions the physicians performed these procedures on patients who did not meet the accepted standards, so it would be useful to understand those standards in more detail.

  5. William White on

    $4.75 million is a significant penalty, but I hope the DOJ also pursues professional sanctions against the doctors involved to further deter this kind of misconduct.

  6. Amelia Smith on

    Vein ablation procedures can be an important treatment for certain circulatory issues, so it’s worrying to see them being misused in this way. More transparency around the appropriate clinical criteria is needed.

  7. Amelia Garcia on

    It’s concerning to see this type of egregious fraud happening in the cardiology field. Patient trust and the integrity of our healthcare system are at stake.

    • Elizabeth Johnson on

      Absolutely. Doctors have an ethical duty to put patient wellbeing first, not their own financial interests. This case is a troubling breach of that trust.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.