Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a significant blow to press freedom in Turkey, an Istanbul court has sentenced veteran journalist Zafer Arapkırlı to two years and six months in prison under the country’s controversial 2022 media law that criminalizes “spreading misleading information.” The verdict, reported Tuesday by journalists and human rights organizations, has sparked renewed concerns about media repression in the country.

Arapkırlı, a columnist for the opposition daily BirGun, was convicted for comments he made on Twitter (now X) regarding internal conflicts in Syria. His posts discussed violence between supporters of former President Bashar al-Assad and forces of the new Syrian government in predominantly Alevi villages. The case is particularly sensitive given Turkey’s support for the rebel offensive that ousted Assad and its close ties with Syria’s new leadership under President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

During the court proceedings, Arapkırlı firmly rejected the charges against him. “Here, in the presence of the prosecutor, I wish to report a more serious crime: the collective plunging of society into deep darkness,” he declared, according to the Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA). The court did acquit him on a separate charge of inciting hatred and hostility.

In a related case heard by the same court, journalist Şule Aydin was acquitted, but three of her colleagues from the opposition channel Halk TV were convicted for comments made during a 2024 television program discussing alleged Turkish trade with Israel. Timur Soykan received a 10-month prison sentence for “breach of confidentiality,” while Murat Agirel and Barish Pehlivan each received one year and three months for “public dissemination of misleading information.”

Speaking to AFP after the verdict, Arapkırlı confirmed his intention to appeal, though he noted that sentences under three years are rarely enforced in Turkey. However, such convictions typically require ongoing court appearances that can impose significant financial burdens on journalists. “The authorities are trying to create obstacles and restrict our work, but our resistance will continue regardless,” he stated, characterizing the situation as “an attempt to tie our hands and intimidate us—a form of repression.”

These convictions stem from legislation passed in 2022 under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government, which critics have dubbed the “censorship law.” The controversial measure criminalizes the spread of “misleading” information with penalties of up to three years in prison and extends media regulations to online publications and social media platforms. When the law was introduced, the United Nations urged Ankara to uphold freedom of expression, warning that the vague language of the legislation created significant potential for abuse.

Arapkırlı expressed particular concern about what he described as a “systemic pattern” of repression. “When the law was introduced in 2022, the authorities claimed it would not be applied against journalists. In reality, however, it is now being used precisely against them,” he explained.

The convictions have drawn sharp criticism from international press freedom advocates. Erol Yonderoğlu of Reporters Without Borders (RSF) condemned the sentences, stating that they aim “to strip journalists of their public role” and warning that “journalism cannot cease to be a dangerous profession until the instrumentalization of the law is brought to an end.”

Turkey’s standing in global press freedom rankings remains dismal, with the country placed 159th out of 180 nations in RSF’s latest Press Freedom Index—positioned between Pakistan and Venezuela. These latest convictions are likely to reinforce concerns about the deteriorating state of media independence in what was once considered a more progressive Muslim-majority democracy.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Elijah White on

    While fighting disinformation is important, this conviction of a Turkish journalist over tweets about the Syrian civil war is extremely worrying. Journalists must be able to report on conflicts without fear of prosecution.

  2. Mary V. Martinez on

    The conviction of this journalist in Turkey is a worrying sign of the country’s crackdown on media freedom under the guise of fighting disinformation. Journalists must be able to report on conflicts without fear of prosecution.

  3. Concerning to see press freedom eroded in Turkey under this new disinformation law. Criminalizing journalists’ commentary on sensitive geopolitical issues is a worrying trend that undermines democratic discourse.

    • Noah Johnson on

      I agree, this case highlights the delicate balance between combating misinformation and protecting freedom of expression. Convicting a journalist for tweets about the Syrian conflict seems like an overreach.

  4. The conviction of this columnist for discussing the situation in Syria raises serious questions about the motives and application of Turkey’s new disinformation law. Journalists should be able to report on conflicts without fear of prosecution.

    • Mary Johnson on

      Absolutely. This case appears to be more about suppressing critical commentary than addressing genuine misinformation. Concerning trend for press freedoms in the country.

  5. Olivia K. Taylor on

    Deeply troubling to see Turkey using its controversial disinformation law to target and imprison a journalist for commentary on the Syrian civil war. Clearly an overreach that undermines democratic principles.

  6. This conviction of a Turkish journalist under the country’s new disinformation law is highly concerning. Criminalizing reporters’ commentary on sensitive geopolitical issues like the Syrian conflict sets a dangerous precedent for press freedom.

    • Robert Garcia on

      Agree, this case seems more about silencing critical voices than addressing genuine misinformation. Turkey should be protecting the ability of journalists to report on conflicts, not imprisoning them for it.

  7. Noah Hernandez on

    Troubling to see Turkey using its disinformation law to target journalists reporting on sensitive geopolitical issues like the conflict in Syria. Undermines democratic principles of free speech and media scrutiny.

    • Agreed, this case highlights the risks of overly broad ‘anti-disinformation’ laws being used to suppress legitimate journalism. Hopefully there is robust pushback to protect press freedoms in Turkey.

  8. Jennifer A. Miller on

    While combating disinformation is important, this conviction of a journalist over comments on the Syrian conflict seems like an abuse of Turkey’s new media law. Concerning precedent for press freedom.

  9. Lucas Garcia on

    While misinformation is a real problem, this conviction of a Turkish journalist over tweets on the Syrian conflict seems like an abuse of the country’s new disinformation law. Concerning for press freedom.

    • Absolutely. This case appears to be more about suppressing critical reporting than addressing genuine falsehoods. Turkey should be protecting journalists, not criminalizing their work.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.