Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

AI Dominance Race Intensifies Between Global Powers, Experts Warn

The question is no longer whether artificial intelligence will reshape the global order, but how quickly—and at what cost. Throughout 2025, technological breakthroughs from both the United States and China accelerated the competition for AI supremacy between the superpowers, while nations worldwide scrambled to build data centers and energy infrastructure supporting AI development.

The AI boom propelled Nvidia to become the first company to exceed a five trillion dollar valuation, despite growing concerns about circular financing and whether the AI revolution is built more on hype than substance. Meanwhile, policymakers struggled to balance safety, security, and innovation while preparing for potential labor market disruptions.

As 2026 begins, rapid AI integration threatens to inject even more unpredictability into an already fragmented global landscape. Atlantic Council technology experts have identified several key trends likely to shape the year ahead.

Perhaps most concerning is the rise of what experts call “AI poisoning.” Russia’s Pravda network of websites has published millions of articles targeting more than eighty countries, seemingly designed to influence AI web crawlers that gather training data. This strategy has proven effective, with Russian propaganda appearing in Wikipedia, social media, and responses from major chatbots.

“In 2026, the issue of AI poisoning will break into the mainstream,” warns Emerson Brooking, director of strategy at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab. “Because of a roughly two-year lag in AI training data, these AI-targeted propaganda campaigns are about to start manifesting more often.”

On the geopolitical front, the United States is expected to double down on exporting its tech stack as the cornerstone of its international AI strategy. In December 2025, President Donald Trump allowed Nvidia to export advanced H200 chips to China, signaling that America wins when the world builds with U.S. technology.

“In 2026, expect to see the United States sign more AI-focused partnerships like those forged with Saudi Arabia and the UAE in 2025, alongside efforts to counter China’s growing influence in emerging markets,” notes Tess deBlanc-Knowles, senior director of Atlantic Council Technology Programs.

However, China maintains key advantages, particularly in open-source AI models and applied AI technologies, which could prove decisive in capturing global market share through free models and deployment-ready technologies.

The year is also expected to mark AI governance’s first truly global phase through United Nations-backed initiatives. Nearly all nations now have a forum to debate AI’s risks, norms, and coordination mechanisms, recognizing AI as a shared global concern.

Yet this international cooperation unfolds amid acute geopolitical tension, with the EU pushing rights-based regulation, the United States favoring voluntary standards, and China promoting cooperation while defending state control over data and AI deployment.

“By the end of 2026, the Global Dialogue will likely have made AI governance global in form but geopolitical in substance,” predicts Konstantinos Komaitis, a resident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Democracy + Tech Initiative.

Chinese companies like DeepSeek are expected to continue challenging Western AI dominance, with China doubling down on its open-source AI strategy to influence global AI infrastructure. Trade disputes over rare earth minerals crucial for AI development may intensify, potentially making Latin America the next technology battleground between the United States and China.

Meanwhile, human-AI interaction is expected to challenge human judgment and identity more profoundly than ever before. The increasing sophistication of AI-generated content combined with today’s polarized information environment creates unprecedented challenges for distinguishing fact from fiction.

As AI capabilities grow, many countries are pursuing “sovereign AI” initiatives to control their technological destinies. India’s sovereign large language model is set to launch in February 2026, reflecting a broader trend of nations seeking AI independence to strengthen domestic economies, protect national security, and reflect national values.

This push for control will likely evolve into what experts call a “battle of the AI stacks” – competing approaches to how core digital AI-enabling infrastructure functions. The U.S., EU, and China are all developing distinct technological ecosystems, forcing other nations to navigate these increasingly rivalrous approaches.

Perhaps most alarmingly, China is expected to intensify its AI-enabled disinformation efforts, particularly targeting Taiwan. These operations increasingly blend AI-generated content with human-curated messaging and commercial infrastructure, making them harder to detect and attribute.

As 2026 unfolds, the race for AI dominance appears set to reshape not just technology, but the fundamental balance of global power.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. The exponential growth of AI and its influence on geopolitics is a complex and concerning issue. I’m skeptical of claims that the AI revolution is ‘built more on hype than substance’ – the advancements seem quite real and impactful. Still, the risks around ‘AI poisoning’ and other unintended consequences need to be taken very seriously.

  2. AI is clearly a transformative technology that will have major impacts, both positive and negative. I appreciate the insights from the Atlantic Council experts on the key trends to watch, like the surge in data centers and infrastructure. Balancing innovation, security, and labor market disruptions will be a major challenge.

  3. The exponential growth of AI and its impact on geopolitics is a complex and concerning topic. I’m curious to learn more about the specific ways it could shape global dynamics in the years ahead, both positive and negative. Navigating this landscape will require nuanced and forward-thinking policies.

  4. Patricia Davis on

    The exponential growth of AI and its influence on geopolitics is a complex and multifaceted issue. I’m curious to learn more about the specific ways it could shape global dynamics in the years ahead, both positive and negative. Navigating this landscape will require nuanced, forward-thinking, and collaborative policymaking.

  5. Oliver Thompson on

    The rapid integration of AI across so many domains is certainly alarming. I’m particularly worried about the rise of ‘AI poisoning’ and how misinformation campaigns could leverage these technologies. Maintaining safety and security while fostering innovation will be a delicate balancing act.

  6. Michael E. Rodriguez on

    Interesting to see the AI dominance race heating up between the US and China. I wonder how this competition will play out and what the broader implications will be for the global order. The potential for labor market disruptions is also a major concern that will require careful attention.

  7. Emma Hernandez on

    With AI poised to shape geopolitics so significantly in the coming years, I’m curious to learn more about the specific ways it could affect the global landscape. The concerns around unpredictability and fragmentation are particularly worrying. I hope policymakers can get ahead of these issues and steer things in a positive direction.

  8. The rapid integration of AI across so many domains is both exciting and worrying. I’m particularly concerned about the rise of ‘AI poisoning’ and the potential for misinformation campaigns to leverage these technologies. Maintaining safety and security while fostering innovation will require vigilance and nuanced policies.

  9. Jennifer Davis on

    The race for AI dominance is certainly heating up between global powers. It will be fascinating to see how this shapes geopolitics in the years ahead. I’m curious to learn more about the potential risks, like ‘AI poisoning’, and how policymakers might address them.

  10. The race for AI supremacy between the US and China is certainly a significant geopolitical development. I wonder how this competition will play out and what the broader implications will be for the global order. The potential labor market disruptions are also a major concern that will require careful attention.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.