Listen to the article
President Trump’s selection of Kevin Warsh to lead the Federal Reserve faces a transformed central bank already showing signs of resistance to the administration’s influence, creating challenges for Warsh’s stated goal of bringing “regime change” to the institution.
In an unprecedented development, outgoing Fed Chair Jerome Powell announced he will remain on the board of governors for an undetermined period after his chairmanship concludes on May 15. This marks the first time in nearly five decades that a former chair will continue serving on the board, potentially creating a competing power center within the institution.
The unusual transition comes amid escalating tensions between the White House and the Fed. Wednesday’s policy meeting revealed deep divisions among officials, with four dissenting votes on the monetary policy statement—the most since October 1992. This level of disagreement signals that Fed officials won’t easily fall in line with a new chair, especially one who has been critical of recent policies.
“A 34-year high in dissents is not exactly the welcome mat Mr. Warsh was hoping to see upon his arrival,” noted Stephen Douglass, chief economist at NISA Investment Advisors. “He might want to wear a hard hat at his first meeting, and not only because the Fed building is still under construction.”
Powell cited the administration’s unprecedented legal actions against the central bank as his primary reason for remaining. “These legal attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policy without taking into consideration political factors,” Powell explained during Wednesday’s news conference.
The White House has launched a legal investigation into a Fed building renovation and attempted to remove Governor Lisa Cook over alleged mortgage fraud, which she denies. This case has become a test of presidential authority to dismiss Fed governors, with the Supreme Court appearing to lean in Cook’s favor during January hearings.
By staying on as governor, Powell denies Trump an opportunity to appoint another ally to the board. Currently, three of the seven governors are Trump appointees, and the president won’t have another chance to fill a seat until Powell leaves. Although his term as chair ends in May, Powell can serve as a governor until January 2028.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent criticized Powell’s decision as “highly unusual” and “a violation of all Federal Reserve norms,” but Powell rejected suggestions that his decision injects politics into the Fed. “I’m literally staying because of the actions that have been taken,” he said. “I had long planned to be retiring and the things that have happened really in the last three months have left me no choice but to stay.”
Powell emphasized he would maintain a “low profile” and would not be a “shadow chair” during Warsh’s leadership. “That’s just something I would never do,” Powell stated. “There is only ever one chair of the Federal Reserve board. When Kevin Warsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”
The Senate is expected to confirm Warsh on a narrow, party-line vote the week of May 11, highlighting the Fed’s increasing politicization. By contrast, Powell was confirmed for his second term in 2022 with an 80-19 vote.
While Warsh has promised independence if confirmed, Trump continues to publicly state he expects his nominee to reduce interest rates. However, Powell indicated during Wednesday’s press conference that the committee is shifting away from a bias toward cutting rates to a more neutral stance. This shift could create immediate policy tensions for the incoming chair.
“Warsh is inheriting an institution that will fight for independent, consensus-driven decision-making, a potential obstacle to his vision of wholesale ‘regime change,'” said Jon Hilsenrath, senior advisor to StoneX and visiting scholar at Duke University.
The transition stands in sharp contrast to the relatively smooth handovers between the previous three Fed chairs—Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and Powell—all of whom served as governors before becoming chair. As inflation continues to “misbehave,” according to Powell, economists like Gregory Daco of EY-Parthenon now anticipate the Fed will remain “on hold through the remainder of the year,” further complicating Warsh’s path forward.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
The unusual transition at the Fed, with Powell remaining on the board, is quite intriguing. It will be crucial to monitor how this dynamic affects the central bank’s policymaking and independence. Warsh will certainly have his work cut out for him.
The deep divisions among Fed officials are concerning. Warsh’s efforts to steer the institution in a new direction may face significant opposition, which could have serious implications for the economy.
The deep divisions among Fed officials are concerning. Warsh will face an uphill battle trying to implement his desired changes with such entrenched opposition. This could spell trouble for the economy.
The high level of dissent is a clear sign that the Fed is not willing to simply fall in line with the administration’s agenda. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Interesting development at the Fed. Warsh’s appointment could signal the administration’s desire for more hawkish policies, but Powell’s continued presence may create tensions. Curious to see how this power dynamic plays out.
The high level of dissent among Fed officials suggests they may not readily accept Warsh’s ‘regime change’ agenda. This could make for a turbulent transition period.
The Fed’s resistance to the White House’s influence is noteworthy. With Powell remaining on the board, Warsh may find it difficult to enact his ‘regime change’ goals. This could lead to a prolonged power struggle within the institution.
The unprecedented transition with a former chair staying on the board is quite unusual. It will be crucial to monitor how this dynamic affects the Fed’s policymaking and independence going forward.
The Fed’s resistance to White House influence is notable. Warsh’s selection coupled with Powell’s continued board presence could lead to an internal power struggle. I wonder how this will impact monetary policy going forward.
It’s unusual for a former chair to remain on the board. This could create a competing power center that complicates Warsh’s efforts to steer the Fed in a new direction.
The Fed’s resistance to the White House’s influence is noteworthy. Warsh’s appointment could signal a more hawkish stance, but with Powell remaining on the board, it’s unclear how much change he’ll be able to enact. This will be an interesting power struggle to watch.
The high level of dissent among Fed officials suggests they may not be easily swayed by Warsh’s ‘regime change’ agenda. This could lead to a prolonged period of tension and conflict within the institution.
The high level of dissent among Fed officials is a clear sign that they are not willing to simply accept the administration’s agenda. Warsh will face a formidable challenge in trying to enact his desired changes, especially with Powell remaining on the board.
The continued presence of a former chair on the board is quite unprecedented. This could create a competing power center that complicates Warsh’s efforts to reshape the Fed’s policies and direction.
The high level of dissent among Fed officials is a clear sign that they are not willing to simply fall in line with the administration’s agenda. Warsh will have his work cut out for him trying to implement his desired changes.
The continued presence of Powell on the board could create a competing power center that complicates Warsh’s efforts to steer the Fed in a new direction. This could lead to a prolonged period of uncertainty and instability.