Listen to the article
LA Mayoral Candidates Divided on Noncitizen Voting Rights
A heated exchange over noncitizen voting rights exposed deep political divisions during Wednesday’s Los Angeles mayoral debate hosted by NBC4 and Telemundo, highlighting one of the campaign’s most contentious issues.
The spotlight fell on incumbent Democratic Mayor Karen Bass and Republican challenger Spencer Pratt when moderator Enrique Chiabra pressed candidates for a straightforward yes-or-no answer on whether noncitizens should be permitted to vote in local elections.
Pratt’s response was unequivocal: “No.” When pressed again later in the debate, he maintained his position with the same one-word answer.
Mayor Bass, however, refused to provide a binary response, stating, “It depends. It’s not a yes or no.” She elaborated that the term “noncitizens” encompasses a broad category of residents, including legal permanent residents.
“When you say noncitizens, it doesn’t mean they’re here illegally. It doesn’t mean they’re undocumented. They can have green cards. They could be here perfectly legal,” Bass explained. She noted that various cities and states already permit limited noncitizen voting for specific local elections and added that she would need to review the specifics of any proposal before taking a position.
Councilwoman Nithya Raman, another Democratic candidate in the race, echoed Bass’s nuanced stance. “I would say again, it does depend,” Raman remarked, referencing precedents in other jurisdictions where noncitizen residents can participate in certain local elections, particularly school board races.
The debate comes at a critical moment as a Los Angeles city councilmember is pushing to place the question of noncitizen voting rights on the November ballot, potentially making it a decisive campaign issue. While federal law explicitly prohibits noncitizens from participating in federal elections, municipalities have authority to establish their own rules for local contests.
Several California cities, including San Francisco and Oakland, have already implemented limited forms of noncitizen voting, primarily for school board elections. Advocates argue that all taxpaying residents deserve representation in local governance, while opponents contend that voting should remain a privilege exclusively for citizens.
The exchange highlights the growing national debate around voting rights and immigration policy. In recent years, similar measures have been enacted or proposed in cities across the country, including New York City, where a law allowing noncitizen voting in municipal elections was later struck down by the courts.
The issue could prove particularly significant in Los Angeles, where approximately 35% of residents were born outside the United States, according to census data. Many of these residents contribute to the city’s economy and pay taxes but lack voting representation under current laws.
Pratt, a former reality television personality best known for his appearances on “The Hills,” has positioned himself as one of the leading challengers to Bass in a crowded field of 13 candidates. His straightforward opposition to noncitizen voting aligns with traditional Republican positions on electoral participation and citizenship.
The primary election is scheduled for June 2, with the general election following on November 3. As the race intensifies, candidates’ positions on immigration, voting rights, and representation will likely continue to play a central role in distinguishing their platforms in this highly competitive contest for leadership of America’s second-largest city.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


13 Comments
This exchange on noncitizen voting rights underscores the deep political polarization surrounding the topic. I’m interested to see how voters in Los Angeles respond to the candidates’ contrasting positions on this contentious issue.
Agreed, the debate around noncitizen voting rights is a complex and divisive topic that deserves a nuanced discussion of the potential impacts on local communities.
I appreciate Mayor Bass’s acknowledgment of the nuances involved in defining ‘noncitizens’ and the need to consider the diverse circumstances of residents. This is a complex topic without easy answers.
Agreed, the debate around noncitizen voting rights deserves a thoughtful and balanced examination of the potential impacts on local communities.
This is a complex and contentious issue with valid arguments on both sides. I appreciate Mayor Bass’s nuanced stance, as the term ‘noncitizen’ encompasses a range of legal residency statuses. It’s important to consider the unique circumstances of different communities when determining voting rights.
I agree, this is a complex topic without easy answers. Reasonable people can disagree on the best policy approach.
The exchange between the candidates on noncitizen voting rights highlights the deep divisions on this issue. It will be interesting to see how it plays out in the mayoral race and what factors influence voter perceptions and decisions.
As an observer, I find the differing positions of the mayoral candidates on noncitizen voting rights intriguing. It’s a contentious issue without easy answers. I’m interested to see how this debate evolves and how voters respond.
This is a politically charged topic, and I respect that Mayor Bass is taking a more nuanced approach rather than a simple yes or no. The details and implications of noncitizen voting rights merit careful examination.
Agreed, this is a complex issue that requires a balanced and thoughtful discussion of the potential impacts on local communities.
The differing stances of the mayoral candidates on noncitizen voting rights reflect the broader political divisions on this issue. It’s a complex topic that warrants careful consideration of various perspectives and potential consequences.
Mayor Pratt’s firm stance against noncitizen voting reflects a common perspective, but I’m curious to hear more about the potential benefits and drawbacks of expanding voting rights in local elections. There seem to be valid arguments on both sides of this debate.
I appreciate you raising this important issue. It’s a complex topic that deserves thoughtful consideration of different viewpoints.