Listen to the article
Former Davao de Oro governor Arturo Uy has publicly defended businessman Sammy Uy against allegations of involvement in illegal drug activities, describing the claims as unverified and damaging to the businessman’s reputation.
In a statement that quickly gained traction across social media platforms, Arturo Uy categorically rejected the accusations. “SAMMY UY is not a drug lord,” he declared, describing the businessman as a legitimate and respected figure in Davao City’s business community.
The former governor emphasized that his defense stems from decades of personal connection with Sammy Uy. “I knew him personally. We grew up together. I knew his family, I knew his dealings,” he stated, suggesting that his assessment is grounded in firsthand knowledge rather than speculation.
This public defense comes amid growing controversy surrounding allegations that have emerged in political discussions. Notably, no court has substantiated these claims, and no formal convictions have been issued against Sammy Uy—a fact that supporters consistently highlight in their rebuttals.
Adding weight to Arturo Uy’s defense, the KH (Uy) Family Association-Davao Chapter recently released a formal document titled “Rebuttal to Unfounded Accusation.” The statement, which carried multiple signatures, strongly denied any involvement of Sammy Uy in illegal drug trade or related financial activities, describing the allegations as “false, reckless, and unsupported by credible evidence.”
The association presented several points to counter the accusations, including Sammy Uy’s reputation as a law-abiding businessman with transparent dealings, his standing within the community, and the absence of any criminal record. The group also noted that maintaining professional and personal relationships with various sectors, including public officials, should not be interpreted as evidence of wrongdoing.
The statement expressed concern about the “politically charged environment” where serious accusations appear to be driven more by political narrative-building than factual evidence. The organization warned that publicly labeling an individual as a “drug lord” without due process causes significant harm.
“It is deeply concerning that serious allegations of criminal activity are being used in public discourse in a manner that suggests political motivation rather than a genuine pursuit of truth or justice,” read part of the association’s statement.
The allegations against Sammy Uy gained prominence in April when former senator Antonio Trillanes IV told the House Committee on Justice during impeachment hearings that Vice President Sara Duterte and members of her family allegedly received millions of pesos from Uy, whom Trillanes described as a drug lord.
Sammy Uy is no stranger to political circles in the Philippines. Records show he was one of the major financial contributors to former president Rodrigo Duterte’s successful 2016 presidential campaign. According to Duterte’s Statement of Contributions and Expenditures (SOCE), Uy’s companies—Davao Farms and Davao Import Distributors Inc.—each contributed P30 million, making him part of a group of four Davao businessmen who collectively donated P165 million to the campaign.
Beyond politics, Uy has been described by former president Duterte as a member of a prominent Filipino-Chinese business family in Davao City with diverse commercial interests. His business portfolio reportedly spans multiple industries including appliance distribution, furniture, office equipment, motorcycles, and construction materials. He also has interests in real estate leasing and poultry operations.
Additional business ventures attributed to Uy include investments in hospitality businesses such as motels and hotels, gasoline stations, real estate enterprises, and majority ownership in a private hospital in Davao City.
As the controversy continues to unfold, supporters of Sammy Uy are calling for restraint, accountability, and adherence to proper legal procedures, urging authorities to ensure that allegations are thoroughly investigated and not exploited for political purposes.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
This public defense by the former governor and the Uy family association suggests there may be more to this story than the initial allegations. It’s important to gather all the facts before drawing any firm conclusions.
Absolutely. Maintaining an objective and impartial stance is key, especially when dealing with potentially sensitive matters involving a prominent businessman’s reputation.
It’s encouraging to see the former governor stand up for Sammy Uy and vouch for his character and business dealings. Unsubstantiated allegations can be damaging, so this public defense is an important counterpoint.
I agree. Without verifiable evidence, it’s prudent to reserve judgment and focus on the firsthand accounts provided by trusted sources like the former governor.
The Uy family’s rejection of the drug lord allegations and the former governor’s defense of Sammy Uy suggest these claims may be unfounded. It’s important to uphold the principles of due process and avoid rushing to judgment.
You make a good point. Baseless accusations can be harmful, so it’s wise to approach this situation with caution and objectivity until more concrete information emerges.
The former governor’s personal relationship with Sammy Uy lends credibility to his defense against the drug lord allegations. Without a court conviction, these claims appear to be unsubstantiated and potentially damaging to Uy’s reputation.
I share your view. Respecting due process and allowing the facts to emerge is crucial in these types of cases, rather than jumping to conclusions based on unverified information.
It’s good to see the former governor defending Sammy Uy against these unverified allegations. Untested claims can be damaging, so it’s important to hear from those with firsthand knowledge of the situation.
I agree. Without court convictions, it’s prudent to withhold judgment and focus on the facts presented by credible sources.
The Uy family’s formal rejection of the drug lord allegations and the former governor’s personal defense of Sammy Uy suggest these claims may be unfounded. Upholding the principles of due process is crucial in such cases.
I agree. Maintaining objectivity and avoiding rushed judgments is important, especially when dealing with potentially sensitive issues that could impact a person’s reputation.
The former governor’s firsthand knowledge of Sammy Uy and his family provides a valuable counterpoint to the drug lord allegations. Without court convictions, it’s prudent to withhold judgment and focus on the credible information presented.
Well said. Unsubstantiated claims can be damaging, so it’s important to approach this situation cautiously and allow the due process to unfold before reaching any firm conclusions.
The Uy family’s statement rejecting the drug lord allegations carries weight, given their long-standing personal ties to Sammy Uy. Unfounded rumors should not be allowed to tarnish a respected businessman’s reputation.
Absolutely. Proper due process is crucial, and the lack of formal convictions suggests these claims require further scrutiny before drawing conclusions.