Listen to the article
Green Party Candidate Suspended Over Antisemitic Social Media Posts
Camden’s Green Party has officially withdrawn support for local election candidate Aziz Rahman Hakimi following his suspension by the national party over antisemitic content shared on social media. Hakimi, who was running in Thursday’s election for Haverstock ward, sparked outrage after reposting claims that characterized the March arson attack on Jewish Hatzola ambulances in Golders Green as a “false flag” operation orchestrated by Israel.
The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) confirmed last Friday that the national Green Party had suspended Hakimi pending an investigation into his social media activity. His posts included sharing conspiracy theories alleging “Zionists” were behind the September 11 attacks. Both Labour and Liberal Democrat representatives have condemned his conduct as “abhorrent and antisemitic.”
In response to the controversy, Camden Greens have removed Hakimi from their official list of candidates on the local party website and withdrawn all campaign support. Despite this action, Hakimi’s name will still appear on Thursday’s ballot papers as a Green Party candidate due to electoral regulations.
Under UK electoral law, once the nomination deadline has passed, ballot papers cannot be altered even if a candidate is subsequently suspended or expelled from their party. Should Hakimi win the election, he would be seated as an independent councillor if the party completes its disciplinary process and terminates his membership.
The LDRS investigation uncovered numerous problematic posts from Hakimi’s social media accounts. In 2021, the civil engineer and local business owner directly called Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer an “Israeli poppet” [sic]. His account also shared content urging Muslims to avoid smoking because it would help the tobacco industry “fund the Jews to kill our brothers.”
Sources from both Labour and the Green Party have reported that campaign materials have been removed from Hakimi’s shop window following his suspension. Despite multiple attempts to reach him, Hakimi has not responded to requests for comment on the allegations against him.
This incident is part of a broader pattern of social media controversies affecting Green Party candidates in the current election cycle. The party is facing similar situations with two candidates in Lambeth and another in Croydon who has also been suspended pending investigation.
The controversy comes at a particularly sensitive time, following the actual arson attack on Jewish ambulances in March that shocked the Golders Green community. The attack on the Hatzola ambulance service, which provides emergency medical response to the Jewish community, was widely condemned by political and community leaders across London.
Camden, with its diverse population including a significant Jewish community, has seen heightened tensions following the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and the subsequent conflict in Gaza. Local political parties have been navigating complex community sensitivities during this campaign period.
The situation highlights the challenges political parties face in vetting candidates and monitoring their social media activity in an era when online content can quickly undermine campaign efforts. It also demonstrates how electoral law can create awkward situations where suspended candidates remain on the ballot with party branding despite losing official support.
Voters in Camden will go to the polls this Thursday, May 7, with Hakimi technically still appearing as a Green Party candidate despite having no backing from either the local or national party organization.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
Conspiracy theories about false flag operations and blaming minorities for major events are deeply concerning, especially when coming from political candidates. I’m glad the Green Party took swift action to distance themselves from these troubling views. Hopefully this sends a clear message that such hateful rhetoric has no place in public discourse.
Absolutely. Promoting baseless conspiracy theories can have real and harmful consequences, eroding trust in institutions and fueling division. Responsible parties must be vigilant in rooting out and condemning this kind of extremism.
This is a tricky situation with no easy answers. On one hand, voters should have the freedom to choose their representatives. But on the other, political parties also have to uphold certain ethical standards. I hope this experience leads to deeper reflection on how to balance those competing priorities in a healthy democracy.
This is a complex issue without easy answers. On one hand, voters should have the freedom to choose their representatives. But on the other, political parties also have an obligation to uphold certain ethical standards and prevent the spread of harmful misinformation. I hope this experience leads to thoughtful discussions on how to balance those competing priorities in a healthy democracy.
Well said. Maintaining a fair and inclusive electoral process is crucial, but it must be balanced against the need to prevent the normalization of extremist views. Navigating that line is an ongoing challenge, but one that responsible parties must continually grapple with.
Sharing conspiracy theories that scapegoat minority groups is unacceptable, especially from someone seeking public office. I’m glad the Green Party took action, even if it created logistical challenges. Voters deserve candidates who will unite, not divide, our communities.
Well said. Responsible leadership means making tough calls to uphold democratic values, even when it’s inconvenient. Kudos to the party for taking a principled stand against hatred and misinformation.
This is an unfortunate situation where a candidate’s personal beliefs appear to have crossed the line into harmful conspiracy theories and antisemitism. While freedom of speech is important, political parties have a responsibility to uphold certain principles and standards. Removing the candidate was likely the right call, even if it creates some complications with the election process.
I agree, it’s a difficult balance to strike between democracy and upholding values. Voters should be able to make informed decisions, but parties also must draw lines when beliefs become dangerously extreme or discriminatory.
Spreading conspiracy theories that scapegoat minority groups is extremely troubling, especially from someone seeking public office. The Green Party made the right decision to distance themselves from this candidate, even if it created some administrative challenges. Voters deserve representatives who will uphold democratic values and bring communities together, not divide them with hateful rhetoric.
This is a regrettable situation, but it’s good to see the party taking a firm stance against the candidate’s antisemitic views and conspiracy theories. Spreading such harmful rhetoric, especially about a tragic event like the ambulance arson, is completely unacceptable. Hopefully this sends a clear message that such bigoted ideas have no place in politics.
It’s disheartening to see a political candidate promoting the kind of baseless and dangerous conspiracy theories described here. While freedom of speech is important, parties also have a duty to uphold certain standards and principles. Removing the candidate, even with the logistical challenges, was likely the right call to protect the integrity of the electoral process.
Agreed. Elected officials have a responsibility to bring people together, not divide them with hateful rhetoric and misinformation. This episode underscores the need for vigilance in weeding out extremism from the political sphere.