Listen to the article
Election Commissioner Rules PAC’s False Statements About Manitoba NDP Not Illegal
Manitoba’s elections commissioner has determined that politically charged advertisements containing false information about the New Democratic Party did not violate provincial election laws, despite their misleading nature.
In a decision released this week, Elections Commissioner Bill Bowles addressed complaints about text messages and advertisements issued by the Regina-based Canada Growth Council Inc. during the lead-up to Manitoba’s October 3, 2023 provincial election. The materials in question contained criticism of the then-opposition NDP and its leader, Wab Kinew, who ultimately won the election.
One of the most contentious claims made by the political action committee was that the NDP, if elected, would provide “free heroin and hard drugs for criminals.” Bowles directly refuted this assertion in his ruling, stating, “The statement that the NDP planned to give out free heroin is quite clearly false.”
While the NDP had expressed support for supervised consumption sites as part of their platform on addressing addiction issues, they had consistently maintained that such facilities would only provide supervised locations for individuals using drugs, not supply the substances themselves.
“I understand that (the council) claims that they believed it to be the case, and perhaps that is just possible,” Bowles wrote. “But such a remarkable claim should be verified, and a failure to do so suggests a reckless disregard for the truth, one that a court might well find is a sufficient intention to ground a conviction.”
Despite acknowledging the misleading nature of the advertisements, Bowles determined that Manitoba’s Elections Act does not specifically prohibit false statements about a political party’s platform, creating a significant legal distinction that allowed the council to escape penalty.
The commissioner also addressed complaints that the council had falsely called Kinew a “convicted criminal” in text messages. While Kinew had been convicted of crimes approximately two decades ago, he later received a record suspension, commonly known as a pardon. Bowles concluded that any prosecution for making false statements about Kinew’s character or conduct would not likely succeed under the circumstances.
Financial disclosures filed with Elections Manitoba revealed that the Canada Growth Council spent just under $34,000 on communications in the pre-election period. The council was registered with the elections agency by Dale Richardson, previously reported by the CBC to be a former Saskatchewan Party communications director.
Additional complaints alleged that the council had coordinated its activities with the Progressive Conservative Party and had improperly accessed the voters’ list to obtain phone numbers for their text message campaign. Bowles found no evidence to support either of these assertions.
The case highlights ongoing concerns about the spread of misleading information during election campaigns and the limitations of current election laws in addressing false political advertising. While laws typically prohibit false statements about candidates’ personal character or conduct, the regulations around misrepresentations of party platforms appear to be less stringent in Manitoba.
The NDP’s victory in the October 2023 election, where they captured 34 of 57 legislature seats, suggests the misleading advertisements did not ultimately prevent them from forming government. Under Wab Kinew’s leadership, the NDP defeated the incumbent Progressive Conservatives, marking a significant shift in Manitoba’s political landscape.
Attempts by The Canadian Press to reach the Canada Growth Council and Richardson for comment were unsuccessful at the time of publication.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This decision by the Elections Commissioner raises some concerning questions about the integrity of the electoral process. While false claims may not violate the letter of the law, they can certainly undermine the spirit of free and fair elections. Perhaps the laws need to be revisited to better protect against disinformation campaigns.
I agree, the lack of legal consequences for blatantly false claims is troubling. Voters deserve accurate information to make informed decisions, not misleading propaganda. Strengthening election laws to prohibit deceptive advertising could help safeguard the democratic process.
While the law may not have been broken, the use of false claims in political ads is concerning and undermines the democratic process. Voters deserve accurate information to make informed decisions, not misleading propaganda. Perhaps this case will prompt a review of election regulations to better address deceptive advertising tactics.
Interesting that the election ads contained false claims but were not deemed illegal. Transparency and truthfulness in political ads seem important for a healthy democracy, even if the law doesn’t always keep up. I wonder if tighter regulations on misleading statements could help address this issue.
This situation highlights the challenges of regulating political speech and misinformation, even when it’s clearly false. While the law may not have been technically broken, the impact on voters is concerning. It’s a complex issue without easy solutions, but maintaining trust in the electoral system should be a top priority.
The decision by the Elections Commissioner is troubling, as it suggests that blatantly false information in political ads may not be illegal, even if it misinforms voters. This underscores the need for stronger regulations and enforcement around truthfulness in campaign materials. Maintaining the integrity of the electoral process should be a top priority.
Concerning to see that false claims in political ads were not found to violate the law, even if they were proven untrue. Accurate information and transparency are crucial for voters to make informed decisions. Perhaps the regulations around political advertising need to be re-examined to better protect against misleading tactics.