Listen to the article
California Supreme Court Disbarrs Attorney John Eastman Over 2020 Election Fraud Claims
The California Supreme Court has disbarred attorney John Charles Eastman after finding him culpable on 10 of 11 charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The court’s Wednesday ruling marks a significant milestone in the legal accountability process for attorneys who participated in challenging the election outcome.
The disbarment concludes a lengthy disciplinary process that began in October 2021 when a bipartisan group of attorneys, including former federal judges and California Supreme Court justices, filed a complaint with the State Bar of California. The State Bar Court Review Department had affirmed in July 2025 the findings of the State Bar Court Hearing Department’s March 2024 recommendation for disbarment.
“Today’s California Supreme Court order disbarring John Charles Eastman from the practice of law in California affirms the fundamental principle that attorneys must act with honesty and uphold the rule of law, regardless of the client they represent or the context in which that representation occurs,” said State Bar Chief Trial Counsel George Cardona in a statement.
Both departments within the State Bar Court found Eastman guilty of serious ethical violations for advancing false claims about the 2020 presidential election to mislead courts, public officials, and the American public.
Eastman played a central role in the strategy to overturn the election results in favor of then-President Donald Trump. The State Bar’s July 2025 Review Department decision noted that Eastman “engaged in a calculated campaign to falsely undermine the results of the 2020 presidential election” and “lied to courts, Vice President Michael Pence, and the American people.”
His conduct included filing what investigators deemed frivolous legal claims, making false statements, and advancing a legal theory without factual or legal basis to pressure then-Vice President Pence to reject certified electoral votes. These actions contributed to the tensions that culminated in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
Gillian Feiner, Rule of Law Program Director at the States United Democracy Center, which filed the initial bar complaint against Eastman, said he “fueled the anger of the crowd that attacked the Capitol on January 6 by intentionally, falsely claiming that voting machines manipulated the election results.”
“This decision is an important step toward meaningful accountability for John Eastman, and a critical reminder to all lawyers that they need to uphold their ethical obligations,” Feiner added. “As we witness this administration attempt to normalize attacks on our legal and democratic norms, this decision affirms that no one is above the law.”
The disciplinary proceedings against Eastman included an 11-count disciplinary proceeding and a 35-day trial before the State Bar Court in 2023. He had been on involuntary inactive status and prohibited from practicing law in California since March 2024, when the Hearing Department first issued its disbarment recommendation.
The California Supreme Court’s order makes the disbarment permanent, effectively ending Eastman’s legal career in the state. The decision represents one of the most significant professional consequences for any attorney involved in challenging the 2020 election results.
The disbarment of Eastman comes amid ongoing scrutiny of attorneys who participated in efforts to challenge or overturn the 2020 election. Legal ethics experts have noted that this case establishes an important precedent regarding the professional responsibilities of attorneys when making public claims about election fraud or irregularities.
In California, attorney discipline matters are investigated and prosecuted by the State Bar’s Office of Chief Trial Counsel on behalf of the public. The State Bar Court oversees disciplinary proceedings before recommendations are transmitted to the California Supreme Court for final determination.
This ruling reinforces the legal profession’s ethical standards and demonstrates that even politically charged legal representation must adhere to fundamental principles of honesty and factual accuracy. As further legal proceedings continue against others involved in election challenges, Eastman’s disbarment may signal similar consequences for attorneys who crossed ethical lines in their representation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
This disbarment highlights the importance of attorneys upholding ethical standards, even in politically charged cases. It’s crucial that the legal profession maintain integrity and reject attempts to undermine democratic processes.
Lawyers have a responsibility to the rule of law, not to promote falsehoods for political gain. This ruling sends a strong message about the consequences of abusing one’s position of trust.
The disbarment of this attorney is a significant development. It’s a reminder that the legal system has a responsibility to protect the integrity of democratic processes, even when faced with attempts to undermine them.
I hope this ruling serves as a deterrent to other attorneys who might be tempted to abuse their position for political gain. The legal profession must remain above partisan politics and committed to the truth.
While the details of this case are concerning, I’m glad to see the California Supreme Court taking swift and decisive action. Maintaining the integrity of the legal system is crucial for preserving democratic norms and institutions.
This ruling sends a clear message that promoting false claims, even in a politically charged environment, is unacceptable for members of the legal profession. It’s an important step in upholding the rule of law.
The disbarment of this attorney is a sobering reminder that the legal profession has a sacred duty to uphold the truth and protect the integrity of our democratic processes. This ruling is an important step in holding bad actors accountable.
I’m glad to see the California Supreme Court taking decisive action in this case. Attorneys must be held to the highest ethical standards, even when faced with intense political pressure.
This case highlights the critical role the legal profession plays in safeguarding the foundations of our democracy. Disbarment sends a strong message that the pursuit of truth and justice must take precedence over political agendas.
While disbarment is a serious penalty, it seems warranted given the gravity of the allegations. Upholding the rule of law and maintaining public trust in our institutions are paramount.
This ruling underscores the importance of the legal profession maintaining impartiality and upholding the truth, even in the face of political pressure. It’s a sobering reminder of the dangers of prioritizing ideology over the rule of law.
Disbarment is a heavy penalty, but it seems appropriate given the seriousness of the allegations. Attorneys must be held to the highest standards of integrity and objectivity.
Disbarment is a serious penalty, but it seems warranted given the gravity of the allegations against this attorney. Promoting false election claims can erode public trust in our institutions, which is deeply concerning.
I’m glad to see the California Supreme Court taking a firm stance on this issue. Attorneys must be held accountable when they choose to ignore facts and ethics in service of political agendas.