Listen to the article
A new Pentagon investigation is set to declassify a trove of previously restricted materials related to the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, potentially reshaping public understanding of the chaotic 2021 exit that claimed 13 American service members’ lives.
Unlike prior reviews that identified failures but stopped short of assigning individual responsibility, this broader examination will release interview transcripts, internal documents, and earlier findings that Pentagon officials claim were “overclassified” during the Biden administration.
“We plan to declassify all of the documents that we source in this investigation,” Pentagon adviser Stu Scheller told Fox News Digital. “We’re going to declassify all of it so that everyone can make assessments for themselves.”
The review, ordered by President Donald Trump in May 2025, represents what administration officials describe as a push for accountability regarding what Trump has repeatedly called “a Biden disaster” and “the lowest point in the history of our country.”
What distinguishes this investigation is its extensive scope. Investigators have interviewed senior military leaders and thousands of rank-and-file troops who were on the ground during the withdrawal. “One of the things they said was that they didn’t feel like their experiences were validated,” Scheller explained.
Previous investigations by Congress, the Pentagon, and federal oversight agencies identified numerous failures in planning and execution. A Republican-led House Foreign Affairs Committee report concluded the State Department failed to develop adequate evacuation plans for Americans and Afghan allies despite mounting warnings of Kabul’s impending fall.
The report also revealed U.S. officials had tracked credible threats of a potential ISIS-K attack at Kabul airport in the days leading up to the Abbey Gate bombing, which killed 13 U.S. service members and more than 150 Afghans on August 26, 2021, marking the deadliest day for American forces in Afghanistan in years.
Scheller’s involvement in the review represents a remarkable reversal of fortune. As a Marine lieutenant colonel commanding an infantry training unit at Camp Lejeune, he gained national attention in August 2021 after posting a viral video in uniform demanding accountability from senior military leaders. His actions led to his relief from command, pretrial confinement, and eventual guilty plea at a court-martial.
“I just felt like there wasn’t another voice that was going to advocate for the emperor’s not wearing clothes,” Scheller said of his decision to speak out. “God was with me on that one. I got through it. Here I am influencing the changes I originally pointed out.”
The review has already yielded tangible outcomes for some service members involved in the evacuation. Scheller’s team focused early efforts on Marines stationed at Abbey Gate, where several had been nominated for higher awards that were later downgraded during the approval process.
“They had actually submitted awards that were downgraded. So we didn’t create these awards out of nothing,” Scheller explained. “All seven of these awards were submitted and we had the formal paperwork from the original write-up.”
The upgrades affected Marines from Company G, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marines, including cases where commendation medals were elevated to include valor devices and, in one instance, a Bronze Star was upgraded to reflect combat heroism.
Military recognition aside, the investigation’s most significant impact may come from its promised transparency. By declassifying documents that remained inaccessible during prior reviews, investigators could answer lingering questions about decision-making processes during the withdrawal’s critical moments.
The Biden administration previously defended its handling of the withdrawal, arguing the decision ended America’s longest war and prevented further U.S. casualties, while accusing critics of politicizing the issue. A spokesperson for former President Biden did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new investigation.
As the Pentagon finalizes its report, observers on both sides of the political divide await what could be the most comprehensive accounting yet of how America’s longest war concluded in scenes of chaos at Kabul airport.
“There will be accountability,” Scheller promised.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
18 Comments
While the Afghanistan withdrawal was undoubtedly chaotic, I’m cautious about rushing to judgment before seeing the full details. Objective analysis is needed, not political grandstanding.
Well said. Maintaining impartiality and focusing on lessons learned should be the priority, not scoring political points.
I’m interested to see how this investigation compares to prior reviews. Hopefully it provides a more comprehensive and balanced account, rather than simply assigning blame.
Yes, a thorough, impartial analysis focused on lessons learned would be far more constructive than a partisan attack.
The Afghanistan withdrawal was a complex and chaotic situation. I hope this investigation provides a nuanced, fact-based account to inform future decisions, rather than a partisan narrative.
Agreed, we need an objective examination of what happened, not a political hit job. Transparency is key to understanding and improving.
This report should provide important insights into the Afghanistan withdrawal and identify lessons learned. Transparency is crucial for accountability, so I’m glad the full record will be declassified.
Agreed, an open and thorough investigation is needed to understand what went wrong and prevent such failures in the future.
I’m curious to see how the administration’s actions and decision-making process are portrayed in the declassified materials. Hopefully this leads to constructive reforms, not just political finger-pointing.
That’s a good point. The focus should be on improving processes and planning, not just assigning blame.
Declassifying the full record is a positive step, but I hope the report also delves into systemic issues that contributed to the withdrawal failure, not just individual missteps.
Good point. Looking at the broader context and decision-making processes will be important for identifying meaningful reforms.
I hope this report provides a comprehensive and balanced assessment of the Afghanistan withdrawal. It’s crucial to understand what went wrong, but also to identify successes and areas for improvement.
Absolutely. A thorough, fact-based analysis is needed to inform future planning and decision-making, not just lay blame.
While the withdrawal was undoubtedly messy, I’m skeptical of the claim that it was the “lowest point in the history of our country.” That seems like hyperbole without seeing the full context.
Good observation. Exaggerated rhetoric often obscures the nuances of complex situations. An objective assessment is needed.
The Afghanistan withdrawal was a complex situation with no easy answers. I’m glad to see the full record being declassified so the public can examine the evidence and reach their own conclusions.
Agreed, transparency is key. Hopefully this investigation will lead to meaningful reforms, not just political point-scoring.