Listen to the article
In a significant shake-up at the Department of Homeland Security, President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that Secretary Kristi Noem has been removed from her position, ending her contentious one-year tenure leading the agency. Trump revealed on Truth Social that he will nominate Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin as her replacement.
Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar, a Navy veteran and former mayor of Los Alamitos, California, is expected to temporarily take the helm according to the department’s succession protocol.
Noem’s departure comes after implementing sweeping changes to U.S. immigration policy that sharply contrasted with the approach of her predecessor, Alejandro Mayorkas, during the Biden administration. Under her leadership, DHS reported record drug interdictions exceeding half a million pounds in her first year and dramatically increased deportation operations.
The administration has claimed significant results from Noem’s immigration enforcement agenda, reporting more than 2 million self-deportations in 2025 and approximately 670,000 removals of undocumented immigrants—numbers supporters have characterized as the most successful immigration enforcement operation in U.S. history.
However, these aggressive enforcement actions have drawn intense criticism from Democratic leaders across the country. California Governor Gavin Newsom, Representative Eric Swalwell, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and Maryland midterm candidate David Trone have all publicly condemned aspects of DHS operations under Noem’s leadership.
The Minneapolis operations proved particularly controversial, apparently damaging public perception of the administration’s immigration approach. The backlash was severe enough that U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino was replaced in the Twin Cities by Border Czar Tom Homan amid growing protests and criticism.
Reports suggest Trump’s decision to replace Noem stemmed partly from her performance during recent Judiciary Committee hearings. According to National Review, the president was “furious” with Noem over her testimony regarding a controversial advertising contract that Senator John Kennedy and others scrutinized. The publication reported that Trump took issue with Noem suggesting he had personally approved taxpayer funding for advertisements subcontracted to a firm connected to her inner circle.
The congressional hearings also turned personal when Representative Sydney Kamlager-Dove questioned Noem about rumors of an affair with DHS “special government employee” Corey Lewandowski, a prominent figure from Trump’s 2016 campaign. The exchange became heated as Noem’s husband sat directly behind her during the testimony.
Representative Jared Moskowitz later pressed Noem on the same issue while wearing a “Justice for Cricket” pin—a reference to the dog Noem previously wrote about euthanizing on her farm, a story that generated significant negative publicity for the secretary.
Noem forcefully rejected these lines of questioning, telling the committee she was “shocked that we’re going down and peddling this tabloid garbage in this committee today.” She further accused Democrats of routinely attacking conservative women by portraying them as “either stupid or sluts,” declaring emphatically that she was “neither of those.”
Despite the controversies surrounding her tenure, many Republicans remained supportive of Noem’s leadership at DHS. Representative Clay Higgins praised her during the hearings, saying she had “inherited a disaster, and turned it around,” citing a “97% decrease in illegal crossings” as evidence of effective leadership.
Senator Mullin, who will now face confirmation hearings for the DHS role, initially told National Review “I haven’t talked to the president” when asked about his potential nomination, just prior to Trump’s announcement.
The leadership change comes at a critical time for the department, which continues to face challenges related to immigration enforcement, border security, and interagency coordination across its diverse portfolio of national security responsibilities.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
This is certainly a notable development in the ongoing immigration debate. Noem’s hardline stance at DHS generated a lot of controversy, but also appeared to yield some tangible results in terms of increased enforcement. It will be interesting to see how the new leadership under Mullin chooses to handle these complex issues.
You make a good point. The change in leadership could signal a shift in priorities and approach at DHS. It will be worth following to see how the new team navigates the immigration challenges.
Noem’s removal from the DHS position is a clear sign that the administration is looking to change direction on immigration policy. Her enforcement-focused approach was effective in some ways, but also drew a lot of criticism. I’m curious to see how the new leadership under Mullin will handle these complex issues.
You’re right, the change in leadership at DHS likely signals a shift in priorities. It will be important to watch how the new team navigates the immigration challenges facing the country.
It’s interesting to see the administration shaking up the leadership at DHS. Noem’s tenure was certainly controversial, but the numbers suggest her immigration enforcement agenda achieved significant results. I wonder what this shift in leadership will mean for the agency’s priorities going forward.
You raise a good point. The new leadership will likely bring some changes, but it remains to be seen how that will impact immigration policy and enforcement.
This is a significant move by the administration. Noem’s tenure at DHS was marked by her aggressive immigration policies, which seemed to have some impact in terms of increased deportations and self-deportations. However, her approach was also highly divisive. It will be interesting to see how Mullin approaches these issues.
The shakeup at DHS is certainly newsworthy. Noem’s hardline stance on immigration enforcement seemed to deliver some tangible results, but it was also highly controversial. I wonder if the new leadership under Mullin will take a different approach or maintain a similar focus.
Quite a shakeup at DHS. Noem’s focus on border security and deportations was a sharp contrast to the previous administration’s approach. I’m curious to see how the new leadership under Mullin will handle these hot-button immigration issues.
Yes, the change in leadership could signal a shift in priorities for the agency. It will be interesting to watch how the new team handles the ongoing immigration challenges.
The removal of Noem from her DHS position is a significant move by the administration. Her focus on border security and deportations was a stark contrast to the previous leadership’s approach. I’m curious to see how Mullin’s tenure will differ and how it might impact immigration policy going forward.
The administration’s decision to remove Noem from her DHS role is certainly noteworthy. Her hardline approach to immigration enforcement seemed to produce some results, but it was also very controversial. I wonder if the new leadership under Mullin will take a different tack.
This is an interesting development in the ongoing immigration debate. Noem’s tenure at DHS was defined by her aggressive enforcement policies, which appeared to produce some results in terms of increased deportations and self-deportations. However, her approach was also very divisive. It will be worth following how the new leadership under Mullin handles these complex issues.
Agreed, the change in leadership at DHS could signal a shift in the administration’s approach to immigration. It will be important to see how the new team navigates these sensitive and politically charged issues.