Listen to the article
False Claims Spread About Nawaz Sharif’s X Account Location Amid Pakistan-India Tensions
Fabricated social media claims suggesting former Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s X account is based in India have been debunked following careful analysis of the circulated screenshots.
The misleading posts began appearing after X (formerly Twitter) introduced a new feature in November 2025 that displays a user’s location on their profile. The false narrative spread rapidly across X, Facebook, and TikTok, with posts in Urdu declaring: “Nawaz Sharif has been exposed as the real friend of Modi,” referencing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The fabricated screenshots appeared designed to portray Sharif as disloyal to Pakistan by suggesting his social media presence was operated from neighboring India—a politically charged accusation given the historically tense relationship between the two nuclear powers.
A detailed investigation of Sharif’s actual X profile conducted on December 4 confirmed his account location is indeed set to Pakistan, contradicting the viral claims. Furthermore, analysis of the circulated screenshot revealed multiple inconsistencies indicating manipulation, including an incorrectly formatted handle showing “@nawazsharifmns” in all lowercase letters rather than the correct “@NawazSharifMNS.”
Perhaps most telling was a glaring typographical error in the purported screenshot, which misspelled Sharif’s title as “Former Mrimite of Pakistan” instead of “Former Prime Minister of Pakistan”—a mistake that would not appear on an authentic profile.
The timing of these false claims is particularly significant, coming just months after the most serious military confrontation between Pakistan and India in over two decades. In May, the neighboring countries engaged in four days of missile, drone, and artillery exchanges that resulted in more than 70 casualties on both sides, marking their most intense conflict since 1999.
While X’s location feature has sparked widespread interest in verifying account origins, the platform has cautioned users about its limitations. According to X’s official guidance, the location indicator “may not be accurate and can change periodically.” When users click on an account’s location, a pop-up message appears explaining: “The country or region that an account is based can be impacted by recent travel or temporary relocation.”
This case highlights the continuing challenge of misinformation in South Asian politics, where historical rivalries and national security concerns create fertile ground for false narratives. Political figures like Sharif—who has served as Pakistan’s Prime Minister multiple times—often become targets of digitally manipulated content designed to question their loyalty or undermine their credibility.
Media literacy experts note that the introduction of new social media features frequently creates opportunities for manipulation, as users may not fully understand the limitations or context of the information being presented. This incident represents just one example in an ongoing pattern of misinformation targeting prominent Pakistani political figures.
The spread of such fabricated content remains a significant concern in a region where tensions between neighboring nuclear powers continue to simmer, and where allegations of foreign interference carry particular weight in public discourse.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
Wow, this is a troubling case of disinformation targeting a former Pakistani leader. Fact-checking is so important to counter the spread of misleading narratives, especially on sensitive political issues.
Agreed, the investigation seems thorough in exposing the inconsistencies and manipulation in the screenshots. Transparency around social media user profiles is crucial to prevent such false claims.
The detailed investigation into the inconsistencies in the screenshot evidence is reassuring. It’s critical that we remain vigilant against the spread of disinformation, especially around political figures and international relations.
I agree. Diligent fact-checking and transparency are vital to counter the proliferation of fabricated narratives on social media platforms.
It’s disappointing to see such blatantly fabricated accusations being circulated, likely for political gain. The report highlights the need for digital media literacy to help people spot these kinds of deceptive tactics.
Absolutely. Rigorous fact-checking is the best way to counter the rapid spread of misinformation, especially on sensitive issues with geopolitical implications.
The debunking of these false claims about the former Pakistani PM’s social media profile is a valuable lesson in the importance of fact-checking. Disinformation can spread rapidly, but thorough investigations can expose the truth.
Well said. This case underscores the critical role that independent, impartial reporting plays in combating the proliferation of online misinformation and maintaining an informed citizenry.
The investigation into this false claim about the former Pakistani PM’s social media profile is a timely reminder of the need for media literacy and critical thinking when consuming online content. Verifying information sources is crucial.
Well said. Disinformation can have serious consequences, especially in the realm of international relations. Rigorous fact-checking is the best defense against the spread of fabricated narratives.
This report highlights the need for media literacy and a healthy skepticism towards online claims, even if they align with existing biases or narratives. Verifying information sources is key to preventing the amplification of falsehoods.
Absolutely. Rigorous journalistic standards and a commitment to the truth are essential to maintaining public trust and upholding democratic principles in the digital age.
This case underscores the importance of scrutinizing social media claims, even when they seem to align with certain narratives. Verified, credible sources are essential for understanding the truth behind these types of allegations.
Well said. Fact-based reporting that exposes the manipulation behind these false claims is crucial for maintaining public trust and safeguarding democratic discourse.
It’s concerning to see how quickly fabricated narratives can spread, especially on sensitive political issues. This report’s detailed analysis of the screenshot inconsistencies is a testament to the importance of journalistic integrity.
Agreed. Fact-based reporting that exposes deceptive tactics is essential for preserving the integrity of public discourse and preventing the exploitation of social media for political gain.