Listen to the article
Trump’s Attorney General Appointment Sparks False Claims About Maxwell Connection
Social media claims that U.S. President Donald Trump appointed Ghislaine Maxwell’s former defense attorney as acting attorney general have been proven false, according to fact-checking investigations.
The rumor, which circulated widely on X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook in April 2026, alleged that Trump had selected Maxwell’s lawyer to head the Department of Justice. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking crimes connected to her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence.
In reality, Trump appointed Todd Blanche as acting attorney general on April 2, 2026. While Blanche is indeed Trump’s former defense attorney, he never represented Maxwell in any capacity.
The false claim appears to have stemmed from confusion around Blanche’s professional history and a 2025 incident when Blanche, then serving as deputy attorney general, interviewed Maxwell as part of his official duties.
Blanche’s career path shows no connection to Maxwell’s legal defense. After graduating from law school in 2003, he began working as a federal prosecutor in New York in 2006. He later moved to private practice, joining the firm WilmerHale in 2014 to focus on investigations and criminal litigation matters.
From 2017 to 2023, Blanche worked as a white-collar defense and investigations partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, a financial services law firm. His specialty was representing clients in financial fraud cases, including former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
In 2023, Blanche resigned from his position at Cadwalader to join Trump’s legal team, defending the president against charges related to falsifying business records to hide hush-money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Trump later nominated Blanche for deputy attorney general in 2025 before elevating him to the acting attorney general position.
Maxwell’s actual legal representation has been well documented by reputable news sources. She is currently represented by Florida-based attorney David Oscar Markus, who has been handling her case since 2021. Before Markus, Maxwell had a defense team of four lawyers, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura Menninger from the Colorado-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, along with New York-based attorneys Christian Everdell and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
Notably, the Haddon, Morgan and Foreman firm later sued Maxwell in 2022, alleging she failed to pay her legal fees.
The appointment of Blanche as acting attorney general has generated significant attention due to his previous role as Trump’s personal defense attorney. Critics have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest, given Blanche’s close professional relationship with the president during multiple legal battles.
The spread of misinformation connecting Blanche to Maxwell highlights the ongoing challenges of verifying claims on social media platforms. The false narrative appears designed to create a more sensational connection between the Trump administration and the Epstein case, which has been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories since Epstein’s death in 2019.
Department of Justice officials have not commented specifically on the false claims about Blanche’s connection to Maxwell, though the department’s website clearly outlines Blanche’s professional background and qualifications for the position.
As Blanche assumes his role as acting attorney general, the confirmation process is expected to focus on his qualifications and potential conflicts rather than the debunked connection to Maxwell’s defense team.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
Interesting that the false claim seems to stem from confusion around the acting AG’s professional history. Good to see the facts laid out clearly to dispel the rumors.
Agreed, transparency on these kinds of political appointments is crucial. Glad the reporting got to the bottom of the inaccurate claims.
As someone who follows mining and energy news, I appreciate this fact check. It’s important to have reliable information, especially around high-profile legal cases and government appointments.
Absolutely. Fact-checking is essential to counter the spread of misinformation, especially on topics that intersect with politics and high-profile individuals.
This fact check helps clarify the misinformation around Trump’s acting AG appointment and any connections to the Maxwell case. It’s important to separate fact from fiction, especially on sensitive legal matters.
This report does a good job of clarifying the details and separating fact from fiction. It’s a helpful reminder to be cautious about unsubstantiated claims, especially on social media.
As someone interested in the mining and energy sectors, I’m glad to see this level of fact-checking around a politically charged topic. Maintaining trust in institutions is crucial.