Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In an era marked by heightened geopolitical tensions and artificial intelligence advancements, disinformation and misinformation have emerged as critical threats to democratic institutions worldwide. A new policy brief addresses these challenges by introducing a comprehensive framework centered on “information integrity.”

The publication, titled “Beyond ‘Fake News’: How information integrity creates a building ground for disinformation-resilient society?” comes from Camille Grenier, Executive Director at the Forum on Information and Democracy, and Pierre Noro, Advisor at the Hub. Their work represents a significant departure from traditional approaches that have primarily relied on fact-checking and content moderation.

Instead of reactive measures, the authors advocate for proactive policies that foster positive, plural, and resilient information environments. This approach recognizes that combating disinformation requires more than simply identifying and removing false content—it necessitates strengthening the entire information ecosystem.

The brief meticulously explores information integrity’s multidimensional nature and how strategies built around this concept can unite diverse stakeholders across public, private, and civil society sectors. A key strength of the framework is its adaptability to various national media ecosystems and the specific threats they face, acknowledging that one-size-fits-all solutions are ineffective in the complex world of information manipulation.

Grenier and Noro situate their recommendations within the broader context of rapid technological, economic, and political transformations affecting information ecosystems globally. They address how AI technologies are reshaping media landscapes and highlight particular challenges faced by multilingual countries, where disinformation can spread unevenly across different linguistic communities.

The policy brief traces the evolution of “information integrity” as a concept, noting its shift from primarily countering foreign information manipulations and interferences to a more citizen-centered approach that protects the fundamental right to reliable information. This evolution reflects growing recognition that disinformation is not merely a security issue but a threat to democratic participation and informed citizenship.

The authors identify four key challenges that information integrity policies must address: improving information and media content production, enhancing and securing distribution channels, effectively adapting strategies to local contexts, and creating cross-border synergies that allow nations to learn from each other’s experiences.

A notable innovation proposed in the brief is the creation of National Focal Points on Information Integrity. These would serve as coordinating bodies, facilitating collaboration between countries facing similar information integrity challenges while ensuring coherence between global agreements and their implementation at the national level.

To achieve meaningful progress, the authors offer five strategic recommendations. First, they call for formal recognition of the right to reliable information in international agreements, establishing a normative foundation for future policy development. Second, they emphasize the importance of supporting media organizations that adhere to ethical and professional journalistic standards, recognizing quality journalism as a bulwark against disinformation.

Their third recommendation focuses on ensuring researchers have access to relevant data and strengthening research capacity to better understand disinformation dynamics. Fourth, they advocate for leveraging existing interoperable tools and projects rather than duplicating efforts. Finally, they reiterate the value of establishing National Focal Points on Information Integrity as coordination mechanisms.

This policy brief arrives at a crucial moment when democratic societies worldwide are grappling with unprecedented information manipulation challenges. By moving beyond reactive approaches to disinformation and embracing the concept of information integrity, Grenier and Noro offer a roadmap for building more resilient information ecosystems capable of withstanding contemporary threats while preserving democratic values.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

11 Comments

  1. Michael Hernandez on

    Strengthening the information ecosystem rather than just reacting to individual instances of misinformation is a smart, forward-looking strategy. I’m glad to see this issue being tackled from a systemic perspective.

  2. Proactive, ecosystem-level approaches to addressing disinformation are essential. I’m glad to see this policy brief take a comprehensive view of the information integrity challenge.

  3. Jennifer Garcia on

    Interesting piece on the critical need for information integrity in a digital age rife with disinformation. Building resilient information ecosystems is key to preserving democratic institutions. Curious to learn more about the specific strategies proposed.

    • Agreed, reactive fact-checking alone is not enough. Proactive policies to foster plural, trustworthy information environments seem crucial.

  4. Ava Hernandez on

    Combating disinformation requires more than just fact-checking. This policy brief’s holistic approach to information integrity is an important step forward. Curious to learn how the authors envision operationalizing these ideas in the real world.

  5. Isabella Smith on

    The shift from content moderation to strengthening the entire information ecosystem makes a lot of sense. Eager to see how this comprehensive ‘information integrity’ framework can be applied in practice across sectors like mining, energy, and commodities.

    • Yes, the mining and energy industries are certainly not immune to the spread of misinformation. Implementing these information integrity principles could help build trust and transparency in those domains.

  6. Olivia Martin on

    Establishing information integrity across diverse domains like mining, energy, and commodities could have far-reaching benefits. I’m eager to learn about the specific policy prescriptions outlined in this brief.

  7. Isabella L. Martin on

    Building disinformation-resilient societies requires a multi-faceted strategy. This report’s focus on strengthening the entire information environment is a welcome shift from reactive content moderation.

  8. Patricia Lopez on

    The report’s focus on building disinformation-resilient societies through information integrity is timely and crucial. Curious to understand more about the practical application in sectors like mining, where transparency and trust are paramount.

  9. Robert Martin on

    Curious to understand how the information integrity framework proposed in this brief could be applied to improve transparency and trust in industries like mining and energy. Seems like a valuable approach.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.