Listen to the article
Iceland has become the fifth country to withdraw from the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest amid ongoing controversy over Israel’s participation in the competition, the country’s national broadcaster announced Wednesday.
RÚV, Iceland’s public broadcaster, made the decision following a board meeting, citing the inability to fulfill Eurovision’s traditional role of uniting the Icelandic people. The broadcaster stated that “neither joy nor peace will prevail regarding the participation of RÚV in Eurovision” given the current public debate in Iceland.
“The Song Contest and Eurovision have always had the aim of uniting the Icelandic nation but it is now clear that this aim cannot be achieved,” RÚV explained in its official statement, describing the withdrawal as based on “program-related grounds.”
Iceland joins Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, and Slovenia in boycotting next year’s event in Vienna. The growing list of withdrawals represents a significant challenge to the competition, with Spain being one of the “Big Five” countries that provide major financial contributions to Eurovision. Ireland, a seven-time winner sharing the record with Sweden, is another notable absence.
Iceland’s departure is particularly significant given the country’s passionate Eurovision fanbase. Despite its small population of just 360,000, Iceland boasts the highest per-capita viewing audience of any competing nation, making its withdrawal a considerable blow to the contest’s reach and appeal.
The controversy stems from calls to exclude Israel from the competition over its military campaign in Gaza. Last week, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organizes Eurovision, held a general assembly to address concerns about Israel’s participation. While members voted to implement stricter voting rules following allegations that Israel had manipulated votes in its favor, they stopped short of excluding any broadcaster from the competition.
Critics of Israel’s participation point to the devastating impact of the war in Gaza, where more than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed according to the territory’s Health Ministry, which operates under Hamas governance but whose records are generally considered reliable by international observers. Several experts, including those commissioned by the United Nations, have alleged that Israel’s offensive constitutes genocide, a claim Israel strongly denies.
The Israeli government continues to defend its military actions as a necessary response to the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas-led militants that killed approximately 1,200 people—mostly civilians—and resulted in 251 hostages being taken.
This is not the first time Eurovision has been caught in geopolitical tensions. Russia was expelled from the competition in 2022 following its invasion of Ukraine. The contest has also seen protests outside venues and restrictions on political expressions in recent years as organizers attempt to maintain its apolitical stance.
Wednesday marked the deadline for national broadcasters to confirm their participation in the 2025 contest. More than two dozen countries have already confirmed their attendance, with the EBU expected to publish a final list of competing nations before Christmas.
The growing list of withdrawals raises questions about the future of Eurovision, which will mark its 70th anniversary in 2026. What began as a cultural celebration intended to unite European nations through music now faces significant challenges as it navigates complex international politics while trying to maintain its identity as a celebration of music and cultural exchange.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. Boycotts can be a powerful tool, but they also risk excluding important voices and limiting opportunities for constructive engagement. I’m curious to see if there are any alternative proposals that could address Iceland’s concerns while preserving the inclusive spirit of Eurovision.
The decision to boycott Eurovision is a significant one, and I can understand the factors that led Iceland to take this stance. At the same time, I’m concerned that it could further entrench divisions and miss opportunities for using the platform to promote dialogue and understanding. There may be creative ways to engage that balance principles with pragmatism.
This is a complex geopolitical issue with no easy answers. While I understand the desire to take a principled stand, boycotting cultural events can have unintended consequences that divide rather than unite. Perhaps there are constructive ways to engage and advocate for change within the Eurovision framework.
You raise a fair point. Cultural exchanges can be a powerful tool for building bridges, even in challenging circumstances. It’s worth considering how to participate in a way that upholds values without completely disengaging.
Eurovision has always aimed to bring people together through music, but it’s understandable that the participation of certain countries could be controversial. I’m curious to hear more about the specific reasons behind Iceland’s decision and whether there are any proposed alternatives to a full boycott.
That’s a good question. Boycotts can be a blunt instrument, and it would be interesting to know if Iceland explored other options to voice their concerns while still engaging with the broader Eurovision community.
While I respect Iceland’s decision, I’m concerned that this boycott could further polarize the situation and undermine the unifying spirit of Eurovision. Music has a unique power to transcend political divides – perhaps there are ways to use the platform to promote dialogue and understanding.
That’s a thoughtful perspective. Eurovision has historically been a forum for artistic expression and cultural exchange, even in the midst of geopolitical tensions. Maintaining that spirit of openness and mutual respect could be a valuable approach.