Listen to the article
Indian authorities have escalated their pursuit of three individuals accused of orchestrating an anti-national digital propaganda campaign, with the Counter Intelligence Kashmir (CIK) executing court-ordered proclamations against the fugitives in Srinagar and Kupwara districts.
The Special Judge for cases under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act in Srinagar authorized the proclamations following investigations into what officials describe as a coordinated conspiracy to undermine national security through social media platforms. The case is registered under FIR No. 07/2020 at the CIK Police Station, invoking Sections 153-A and 505 of the Indian Penal Code alongside Section 13 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
The three individuals named in the proclamations are Mubeen Ahmad Shah, son of late Ali Mohammad Shah from Buchwara, Srinagar; Aziz-ul-Hassan Ashai, also known as Tony Ashai, son of Nazir Ahmad Ashai from Dock Wali Colony in Jawahar Nagar, Srinagar; and Rifat Wani, daughter of Ghulam Mohammad Wani from Trehgam, Kupwara.
According to CIK investigators, the accused allegedly posed as journalists, freelancers, and news operators while working in concert with secessionist elements both within and outside Kashmir. Their alleged strategy involved creating and disseminating fabricated and inflammatory content through popular platforms including Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and WhatsApp.
“Our investigation has uncovered a systematic digital campaign designed to provoke street violence, disrupt public order, and foster disaffection against the Indian state,” a senior CIK official told reporters. “The accused expertly disguised propaganda as journalism to lend credibility to secessionist narratives.”
The case highlights growing concerns among security agencies about the weaponization of social media in conflict-sensitive regions like Kashmir. Officials maintain that the accused deliberately spread incendiary content aimed at triggering public unrest and property damage while promoting anti-national sentiments.
“Freedom of expression cannot be weaponized against the nation,” stated a CIK spokesperson. “Those using journalism or online activism as a cover for unlawful or secessionist activities will face decisive legal action.”
This crackdown comes amid increasing government scrutiny of digital content in Jammu and Kashmir following the 2019 abrogation of Article 370, which had granted the region special autonomous status. Security agencies have intensified monitoring of social media platforms, particularly targeting content perceived as challenging India’s territorial integrity or promoting separatist ideologies.
Legal experts note that the proclamation notices serve as a final warning to the absconding individuals. If they fail to surrender within the stipulated period, authorities will proceed with attaching their movable and immovable properties as per legal provisions.
The action against these three individuals signals a broader policy approach by Indian security agencies to counter what they term “digital terrorism.” Officials argue that online propaganda has become a significant security challenge, with potential real-world consequences including public disorder and violence.
Digital rights advocates, however, have expressed concerns about the potential chilling effect such actions might have on legitimate journalism and free speech in the region, which has faced internet shutdowns and communication restrictions in recent years.
CIK has emphasized that their operations target specific illegal activities rather than legitimate expression. “Individuals using digital platforms to spread hatred, disinformation, or anti-national propaganda remain under watch,” the agency stated. “The law will catch up with every offender. There will be no immunity for acts that threaten peace, unity, and national sovereignty.”
The case continues to develop as authorities pursue the three named individuals who remain at large.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
Digital propaganda is a real threat that needs to be taken seriously. However, the details of this case are still emerging. We should withhold judgment until more information comes to light.
Agreed. Transparency and due process are crucial in cases like this involving national security.
This case seems to involve complex issues of national security, free speech, and the spread of online disinformation. I hope the investigation is thorough and fair, leading to a just outcome.
This is a concerning case of alleged digital propaganda and undermining of national security. It’s important to get the full facts and not jump to conclusions. I hope the authorities conduct a thorough and fair investigation.
Rooting out digital propaganda is a major challenge for governments. I’ll be following this case closely to see how the authorities handle the investigation and balance security needs with civil liberties.
This case highlights the evolving threat of online disinformation campaigns. I hope the investigation uncovers the full scope of the alleged conspiracy and leads to appropriate accountability.
Cracking down on fugitives involved in digital propaganda is a complex challenge. I’m curious to learn more about the specific allegations and evidence in this case. Maintaining security while preserving civil liberties is a delicate balance.
You raise a good point. It will be important for the authorities to demonstrate that their actions are justified and proportionate.
Concerning to hear about this alleged digital propaganda plot targeting national security. Fact-based reporting and transparency from authorities will be crucial as this case progresses.