Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Pakistan’s interior minister has accused the opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party of orchestrating sophisticated foreign-funded social media campaigns to manipulate public opinion through fake accounts and manufactured trends.

Speaking at a press conference in Islamabad on Monday, Minister of State for Interior Tallal Chaudhry claimed the PTI has contracted overseas companies to create artificial social media momentum and spread “selective narratives and propaganda” across digital platforms.

“The companies create fake accounts in the name of women and news agencies that are being operated from foreign countries,” Chaudhry told reporters, presenting what he described as evidence obtained directly from X (formerly Twitter).

According to the minister, the operation functions through an elaborate system where PTI allegedly auctions campaign opportunities to foreign companies paid through international funding channels. These firms reportedly establish networks of social media accounts operated from outside Pakistan, often in “countries that are considered our enemies,” rather than by domestic party members or Pakistani citizens.

The minister detailed a process in which contracted companies create temporary WhatsApp groups to distribute instructions for coordinated social media campaigns. These groups are promptly deleted after use to eliminate evidence of the coordination. “The amount of money given for a trend or a tweet can’t be traced,” Chaudhry explained, adding that individual tweets can be valued between 2 cents to Rs100 (approximately $0.36) depending on their impact.

More alarmingly, Chaudhry claimed these same accounts involved in pro-PTI trends also promote content related to terrorist organizations including Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), and pro-Israeli groups—suggesting potential connections to entities considered hostile to Pakistan’s national interests.

The accusations come amid heightened political tensions in Pakistan, where social media has become a crucial battleground for public opinion. PTI, led by former Prime Minister Imran Khan who is currently imprisoned, maintains a strong digital presence that the government has increasingly challenged as manufactured rather than organic.

When questioned about specific financial details, Chaudhry stated that payments are made in dollars through foreign funding channels. “According to our analysis, Pakistanis are rarely involved in these trends,” he asserted, suggesting most activity originates from abroad.

The minister indicated that while the government possesses “a lot of information” about individuals involved in these operations, authorities are currently focused on issuing warnings rather than initiating criminal proceedings. “We are cautioning them not to be part of trends that are against the country for monetary gains,” he said.

Chaudhry acknowledged the challenges in holding perpetrators accountable, noting that social media platforms rarely provide IP addresses or account holder details due to privacy regulations. Nevertheless, he stated the government has engaged with these platforms and will attempt to contact countries where suspect accounts operate.

The PTI has reportedly denied these allegations, insisting their social media support reflects genuine public sentiment. “No one wants to own it. They say it [the trends and hashtags] is organic and [real] people participate in it,” Chaudhry said of the party’s response, while maintaining his position that the government has evidence proving otherwise.

This controversy reflects broader global concerns about digital manipulation and foreign interference in domestic politics. Chaudhry referenced European nations that have taken measures to restrict social media platforms to safeguard national interests, suggesting Pakistan may consider similar approaches.

As digital campaigning becomes increasingly sophisticated worldwide, this accusation highlights the growing challenge governments face in distinguishing between authentic public discourse and orchestrated influence operations on social media platforms.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

17 Comments

  1. While the minister’s accusations are concerning, I’d caution against taking them at face value without a thorough investigation. Allegations of foreign interference in domestic politics are often politically charged and require careful, impartial analysis to substantiate.

    • Patricia Rodriguez on

      That’s a prudent approach. Maintaining a critical and balanced perspective is important when dealing with sensitive issues that have the potential to polarize public discourse.

  2. Michael Y. Rodriguez on

    These allegations raise important questions about the role of social media in shaping political narratives. Regardless of the specific details, it’s clear that more robust mechanisms are needed to ensure transparency and accountability in online discourse, both domestically and internationally.

  3. The minister’s claims, if true, would be a concerning development that undermines the integrity of Pakistan’s democratic processes. However, it’s crucial that any investigation into these allegations be conducted in a fair, impartial, and transparent manner to maintain public trust.

    • Well said. Upholding the principles of democratic governance, including the free and fair exchange of ideas, should be the top priority in addressing these complex issues.

  4. I’m skeptical of these allegations without seeing the specific evidence. Accusations of foreign meddling in domestic politics are often used as a political tactic. More transparency and independent verification would be needed to assess the validity of these claims.

    • That’s a reasonable perspective. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, as the saying goes. Careful scrutiny of the data is warranted before drawing conclusions.

  5. Jennifer Lopez on

    If these claims are accurate, it would be a troubling development that undermines the integrity of Pakistan’s democratic processes. Transparent and independent verification of the evidence is essential to determine the validity of the allegations and the appropriate response.

  6. This is a complex issue with potential geopolitical dimensions. While the minister’s claims warrant scrutiny, I’m hesitant to draw firm conclusions without a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and the supporting evidence. Careful analysis is required.

  7. Elizabeth Jackson on

    The minister’s allegations raise valid concerns about the role of foreign influence in domestic politics. However, it’s important to avoid jumping to conclusions and to demand a thorough, impartial investigation to uncover the full truth of the matter.

    • Agreed. Maintaining objectivity and due process is crucial when dealing with sensitive issues of this nature. Rushing to judgment could undermine the credibility of any findings.

  8. If true, the use of foreign-funded social media campaigns to manipulate public opinion is deeply troubling. It undermines the integrity of democratic discourse and enables the spread of disinformation. Rigorous investigation and accountability measures are needed.

    • Michael M. Taylor on

      I agree, the implications are serious if these allegations are substantiated. Protecting the public’s access to accurate, unbiased information should be a top priority.

  9. Elizabeth Martin on

    This is a concerning development if the claims are accurate. Social media campaigns that leverage fake accounts and coordinated narratives can distort and polarize public dialogue. Regulatory oversight and platform accountability may be needed to address such issues.

    • You raise a fair point. Social media platforms have a responsibility to detect and mitigate the spread of coordinated disinformation campaigns, regardless of their origin.

  10. Interesting allegations about foreign influence in Pakistan’s social media landscape. If true, it raises concerns about the integrity of online discourse and the potential for manipulation of public opinion. I’d be curious to see the evidence minister Chaudhry presented.

    • Agreed, transparency around the evidence is crucial. Accusations of foreign interference in domestic politics are serious and should be backed by credible data.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.