Listen to the article
The Trump administration has begun dismantling the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Colorado, a move that has sparked significant concern among scientists and lawmakers. White House Budget Director Russ Vought announced the decision Tuesday night, stating that a comprehensive review of the lab is underway and that “vital activities such as weather research will be moved to another entity or location.”
NCAR, which houses the nation’s largest federal research program on climate change, is responsible for critical research that helps predict, prepare for, and respond to severe weather events and natural disasters. The center is managed by a nonprofit consortium representing more than 130 colleges and universities on behalf of the National Science Foundation.
According to a senior White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity, the administration’s decision stems from concerns about what they described as the lab’s “woke direction” and wasteful spending on “frivolous pursuits and ideologies.” The official cited two specific programs: an Indigenous and Earth Sciences center aimed at making sciences “more welcoming, inclusive, and justice-centered,” and research tracing air pollution that allegedly sought to “demonize motor vehicles, oil and gas operations.”
The decision has met with immediate pushback from climate scientists. Katharine Hayhoe, a Distinguished Professor at Texas Tech University, called NCAR “quite literally our global mothership” for climate science. “NCAR supports the scientists who fly into hurricanes, the meteorologists who develop new radar technology, the physicists who envision and code new weather models, and yes — the largest community climate model in the world,” Hayhoe said in a social media post. She warned that “dismantling NCAR is like taking a sledgehammer to the keystone holding up our scientific understanding of the planet.”
NCAR’s origins trace back to the post-World War II era when increasing interest in meteorology, solar observations, and atmospheric science led to its creation. The center initially focused on atmospheric chemistry and physical meteorology but saw its budget more than double between the 1980s and 1990s as federal focus on climate change research intensified.
Colorado Governor Jared Polis defended the institution, noting that “climate change is real, but the work of NCAR goes far beyond climate science.” The Democratic governor emphasized NCAR’s role in delivering data about severe weather events that helps “save lives and property and prevent devastation for families.” He warned that if the cuts move forward, “we will lose our competitive advantage against foreign powers and adversaries in the pursuit of scientific discovery.”
The White House has framed the move as “restoring the lab to its original purpose,” though it remains unclear how many of NCAR’s 830 employees and associated university programs will be affected by the decision.
This action follows another recent administration move targeting Colorado’s renewable energy research. Earlier this month, the National Renewable Energy Lab was renamed the “National Laboratory of the Rockies” and had its focus on wind and solar power removed. Assistant Energy Secretary Audrey Robertson stated that the Trump administration is “no longer picking and choosing energy sources.”
Colorado’s Democratic senators John Hickenlooper and Michael Bennet, along with Representative Joe Neguse, issued a joint statement condemning the administration’s decision. They described the move as “reckless” and “blatantly retaliatory,” arguing that it would have “devastating consequences for families in Colorado and communities across the nation.”
Antonio Busalacchi, president of the nonprofit consortium that manages NCAR, warned that dismantling the research lab “would set back our nation’s ability to predict, prepare for, and respond to severe weather and other natural disasters.”
The decision represents a significant shift in federal climate policy and raises questions about the future of climate and atmospheric research in the United States at a time when extreme weather events are becoming increasingly common and severe.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
While I’m all for rooting out government waste, NCAR’s work on weather modeling and disaster preparedness seems vital. Dissolving the lab seems like a reckless move that could put public safety at risk.
This decision to shut down NCAR is deeply concerning. Their research helps save lives and property by improving forecasting and resilience to natural disasters. Defunding them will only hurt public safety and scientific progress.
While cost-cutting is important, defunding NCAR’s climate and weather research seems incredibly short-sighted. Their work is essential for protecting public safety and advancing scientific knowledge.
NCAR plays a crucial role in helping communities prepare for and mitigate the impacts of climate change. Dismantling their operations would be a disastrous move that undermines public safety and scientific progress.
While cost-cutting is important, shutting down NCAR seems like an extremely shortsighted decision that could have severe consequences. Their research is vital for understanding and responding to the climate crisis.
Dissolving NCAR would be a huge loss for climate science and disaster preparedness. Labeling their efforts as ‘woke’ or ‘frivolous’ seems like a misguided attempt to politicize important environmental research.
Dismantling NCAR would be a major blow to our understanding of climate change and our ability to respond to severe weather. I hope the administration reconsiders this decision and maintains funding for the lab.
While I understand the administration’s concerns about fiscal responsibility, dismantling a leading climate research institution like NCAR seems shortsighted. Their work is crucial for understanding and preparing for extreme weather events.
It’s concerning to see the administration move to dissolve NCAR, a leading climate research institution. Their work is critical for preparing communities for extreme weather and natural disasters.
Agreed. NCAR’s research is invaluable and shutting down the lab would be a huge loss for the country.
NCAR’s research is essential for understanding and responding to the growing threat of climate change. Defunding them in the name of fiscal responsibility is shortsighted and dangerous.
Losing NCAR would be a major blow to climate science and our ability to forecast and respond to severe weather events. I hope the administration reconsiders this decision and maintains funding for the lab.
Relocating NCAR’s vital weather and climate research seems like an unnecessary disruption. I hope the administration reconsiders this move and maintains funding for such a critical national resource.
Agreed. Dismantling NCAR would be a major setback for climate science and preparedness. Their work is invaluable.
Defunding NCAR’s climate and weather research would be a huge setback for the country. Their work is essential for improving forecasting, strengthening disaster resilience, and advancing our understanding of the environment.
Completely agree. NCAR’s contributions to climate science and public safety are irreplaceable. Dismantling the lab would be a grave mistake.