Listen to the article
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis has launched a scathing critique of the Trump administration after FEMA denied the state’s requests for disaster declarations following devastating wildfires and floods that struck the region this year.
The Democratic governor received two rejection letters from the Federal Emergency Management Agency late Saturday, denying assistance for wildfires and mudslides that occurred in August, as well as what Polis described as “historic flooding” across southwest Colorado in October.
“Coloradans impacted by the Elk and Lee fires and the flooding in Southwestern Colorado deserve better than the political games President Trump is playing,” Polis said in a statement. The governor vowed to appeal the decision, emphasizing the critical nature of federal support for affected communities still struggling to recover.
Colorado’s Democratic U.S. Senators quickly joined the governor in condemning the denials. Senator Michael Bennet called the decision “unacceptable” in a post on social media platform X, stressing that “Western Colorado communities need help recovering after the historic flooding and wildfires this year, and federal assistance should be available to every state and county that needs it.”
Senator John Hickenlooper was equally direct, writing: “This isn’t a game. These are people’s lives.” He added that “Coloradans are trying to rebuild their lives after fires and floods destroyed homes and communities across our state,” characterizing the Trump administration’s rejection as “unacceptable.”
The dispute highlights growing tensions between state and federal authorities over disaster response as climate-related emergencies become more frequent and severe across the Western United States. Colorado has faced increasingly destructive wildfire seasons and flooding events in recent years, straining local resources and emergency response capabilities.
The White House defended the administration’s position, with spokesperson Abigail Jackson insisting there was “no politicization” in the decisions regarding disaster relief. Jackson stated that President Trump responds to each request for federal disaster assistance “with great care and consideration, ensuring American tax dollars are used appropriately and efficiently by the states to supplement — not substitute, their obligation to respond to and recover from disasters.”
The controversy comes amid broader changes in federal emergency management philosophy under the Trump administration. The president has previously suggested the possibility of “phasing out” FEMA entirely, advocating for states to assume greater responsibility in disaster response and recovery efforts.
Under the current system, states typically lead initial government response after disasters, but can request federal assistance when emergencies exceed their capacity to manage independently. Federal disaster declarations unlock crucial funding and resources that help communities rebuild infrastructure, provide temporary housing, and offer other forms of assistance to affected residents.
The timing of the denials is particularly significant for Colorado communities still recovering from this year’s natural disasters. The Elk and Lee fires burned through thousands of acres, destroying homes and forcing evacuations, while October’s flooding caused extensive damage to infrastructure throughout southwest Colorado.
Local officials in affected counties have expressed concern about their ability to fully recover without federal assistance, pointing to limited state budgets already stretched thin by multiple emergencies. Community leaders in several hard-hit areas had been counting on FEMA support to rebuild damaged roads, bridges, and public facilities.
As Polis prepares to appeal the decisions, the situation underscores broader questions about disaster preparedness and response in an era of increasing climate volatility, as well as the complex relationship between state governments and federal agencies during times of crisis.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
Disaster relief should be apolitical and focused on helping those in need, regardless of party affiliation. The governor is right to call out what appears to be political gamesmanship. I hope this can be resolved quickly for the sake of Coloradans.
Well said. Disaster response needs to be guided by facts on the ground, not partisan calculations. Hopefully cooler heads can prevail and find a solution.
This is a disappointing but not entirely surprising development. The politicization of disaster aid is concerning and could have real consequences for those in need. Hopefully the appeals process leads to a more equitable outcome.
You make a fair point. It’s critical that the appeals process remains objective and focused on the merits of the situation, not partisan interests.
This is a concerning decision by the administration. Disaster relief should be based on need, not politics. Hopefully the appeals process will lead to the necessary support for Colorado communities impacted by these devastating events.
Agreed, the politicization of disaster aid is troubling. The Governor is right to push back and fight for his constituents.
While I can understand the administration’s perspective, this seems like an overly partisan move that disregards the real suffering of Coloradans. Providing timely federal disaster relief should be a non-partisan priority.
Absolutely. Disaster response needs to be objective and based on the facts on the ground, not political calculations.
This is a concerning development that highlights the growing politicization of disaster relief. Providing aid to impacted communities should not be used as a bargaining chip. I hope the administration reconsiders its position.
Absolutely. Disaster relief must remain impartial and focused on the well-being of those affected, not political posturing.
I’m curious to understand the administration’s rationale here. While I don’t doubt the governor’s account, I’d like to see the data and reasoning behind the FEMA decision. Transparency is important, even in contentious situations like this.
That’s a reasonable perspective. More information from all sides would help provide a clearer picture of the situation and the factors driving the decision.