Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

White House Press Secretary Clashes with Reporters Over Inflation Data

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt engaged in a heated exchange with reporters during Thursday’s briefing, particularly with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, over the administration’s messaging on inflation and economic conditions.

The confrontation began when Collins pressed Leavitt to reconcile what she characterized as President Donald Trump’s contradictory statements about the economy—claiming it was booming while simultaneously advising parents to reduce Christmas spending due to high prices.

Leavitt responded with economic statistics, noting that inflation has decreased since Trump took office. “Inflation is down from where it was. As measured by the overall CPI, it has slowed to an average 2.5% pace,” she stated. “This is down from what the president inherited. The president inherited 2.9% in January. Today, it’s at about 2.5%, so we’re trending in the right direction.”

The press secretary then highlighted the inflation trajectory across administrations, adding that when Trump left office after his first term, inflation stood at 1.7%, before rising to what she called “a record-high 9%” under the Biden administration.

“In 10 months, the president has clawed us out of this hole, he’s kept it low at 2.5%, and we believe that number is going to continue to decline,” Leavitt asserted.

When Collins attempted to interject that “nobody is saying it wasn’t high under Biden” but that inflation remains “virtually unchanged,” the exchange grew more contentious. Leavitt accused the press corps of applying a double standard in their scrutiny.

“Nobody reported it on being high under Biden. My predecessor was standing up here at this podium, but now you want to ask me a lot of questions about it,” Leavitt said. She further claimed that her predecessor had stated “inflation doesn’t exist” and that the border was secure, which Leavitt characterized as “two utter lies.”

The press secretary then directly accused Collins of pushing narratives rather than reporting facts: “Everything I’m telling you is the truth backed by real factual data, and you just don’t want to report on it because you want to push untrue narratives about the president.”

The exchange underscores the growing political sensitivity around economic issues ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Affordability has emerged as a critical battleground after several Democratic victories in 2025 campaigns that focused heavily on cost-of-living issues. Republicans, including the Trump administration, are now recalibrating their economic messaging in response.

Despite Leavitt’s positive framing of economic indicators, public sentiment remains largely negative. A November Fox News national survey found that 76% of voters view the economy negatively, an increase from 67% in July and up from the 70% reported at the end of Biden’s term. This represents a deterioration in public perception during Trump’s second term thus far, despite his administration’s insistence that economic conditions are improving.

The divergence between the administration’s economic messaging and voter sentiment presents a growing challenge for the White House. Trump himself recently told Politico that he would give his economic performance an “A-plus-plus-plus-plus-plus” grade, a stark contrast to the predominately negative views held by the electorate.

Economic metrics will likely remain a focal point of political debate as both parties position themselves ahead of the midterms, with Republicans seeking to demonstrate progress on inflation while Democrats continue to emphasize ongoing affordability concerns among American voters.

The administration’s handling of these economic narratives and its ability to shift public perception could prove decisive in determining which party gains the political advantage on kitchen-table issues that historically drive voter behavior in midterm elections.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

11 Comments

  1. William Martin on

    The debate over inflation and its causes is an important one, but it’s concerning to see it devolve into a confrontational exchange. I hope both sides can find a way to engage constructively on this critical issue.

  2. This clash highlights the need for clear, consistent, and non-partisan communication from the White House on economic matters. Transparency and factual analysis should be the priority, not political point-scoring.

  3. Olivia Rodriguez on

    This exchange underscores the challenges of economic messaging and the need for transparency and accountability from both the administration and the media. Careful examination of the data is crucial.

    • Patricia Taylor on

      Well said. Keeping the discussion focused on the facts, rather than partisan rhetoric, will serve the public interest best.

  4. William Garcia on

    The clash between the CNN reporter and the White House spokesperson highlights the ongoing debate around inflation and economic messaging. It’s important to look at the data objectively and avoid partisan narratives.

  5. The exchange raises valid questions about the administration’s messaging on the economy. While partisan politics are inevitable, I hope the focus can shift to an objective, data-driven analysis of the inflation situation.

  6. This confrontation underscores the importance of economic reporting that is grounded in facts and analysis, rather than partisan talking points. I hope both sides can find a way to have a more productive conversation on this critical issue.

  7. Jennifer Hernandez on

    It’s disappointing to see the discussion around inflation become so adversarial. I hope both the administration and the media can find a way to have a more constructive dialogue and focus on the actual data and its implications.

  8. Interesting to see the different perspectives on the economic trajectory across administrations. Inflation is a complex issue, and it will be important to monitor the trends going forward.

    • Agreed, the nuances of inflation data can be easily politicized. Fact-based analysis from multiple sources is key to understanding the full picture.

  9. The clash between the CNN reporter and the White House spokesperson is a reminder of the need for nuanced, fact-based discussions on complex economic topics. I hope this exchange leads to more transparency and accountability in the future.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.