Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has publicly challenged House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer to hold a transparent, public hearing regarding the Epstein files, rather than the closed-door sessions currently scheduled for later this month.

“For six months, we engaged Republicans on the Oversight Committee in good faith. We told them what we know, under oath. They ignored all of it. They moved the goalposts and turned accountability into an exercise in distraction,” Clinton wrote on social media platform X. She directly addressed Chairman Comer, adding: “So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, Rep. James Comer, let’s have it—in public. You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on. We will be there.”

The challenge comes after months of tension between the Clintons and the Republican-led committee. Chairman Comer announced Wednesday that both Hillary and former President Bill Clinton have agreed to sit for closed-door transcribed interviews on February 26 and 27, respectively. According to Comer, these sessions will be filmed, though not conducted in a public forum.

This agreement narrowly averted what appeared to be imminent contempt of Congress votes against both Clintons. The House Oversight Committee had previously advanced contempt resolutions with bipartisan support—nine Democrats joined Republicans in voting to advance Bill Clinton’s contempt resolution, while three Democrats supported similar measures against Hillary Clinton. Had these contempt votes succeeded in the full House, both Clintons could have been referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution.

“Republicans and Democrats on the Oversight Committee have been clear: no one is above the law—and that includes the Clintons,” Comer said in a statement. “After delaying and defying duly issued subpoenas for six months, the House Oversight Committee moved swiftly to initiate contempt of Congress proceedings in response to their non-compliance.”

The investigation centers around the Clintons’ connections to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in prison while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Epstein maintained relationships with numerous high-profile individuals across politics, business, and entertainment before his death in 2019. His former associate Ghislaine Maxwell was subsequently convicted of sex trafficking and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence.

The probe represents one of several politically charged investigations being conducted by House Republicans during this election year. Critics suggest the timing and nature of the investigation are politically motivated, while supporters argue that no individual should be exempt from congressional oversight, regardless of their political stature.

Comer characterized the Clintons’ agreement to testify as a complete capitulation. “Once it became clear that the House of Representatives would hold them in contempt, the Clintons completely caved and will appear for transcribed, filmed depositions this month,” he said. “We look forward to questioning the Clintons as part of our investigation into the horrific crimes of Epstein and Maxwell, to deliver transparency and accountability for the American people and for survivors.”

Hillary Clinton’s public challenge for an open hearing marks a significant shift in strategy. By calling for complete transparency, she appears to be attempting to reclaim some narrative control in a process that has largely been directed by Republican committee leadership.

The Clintons’ testimonies come amid increased public interest in Epstein’s connections following the release of court documents and ongoing investigations into the extent of his criminal activities. Several survivors of Epstein’s abuse have advocated for full transparency regarding his powerful associates and enablers.

Whether Comer will accept Clinton’s challenge for a public hearing remains to be seen, but for now, the scheduled closed-door depositions are set to proceed in late February, marking a significant moment in the ongoing congressional investigation.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. I appreciate Clinton’s call for transparency, but the closed-door interviews may provide a more conducive environment for a thorough investigation. Hopefully, both sides can work together to uncover the facts and reach a fair conclusion.

    • Agreed. Maintaining an objective and bipartisan approach is essential for this sensitive inquiry to be effective and credible.

  2. Michael Williams on

    While I understand the desire for transparency, a public hearing may not be the best approach here. Closed-door interviews allow for more detailed and candid discussions, which could be more productive in getting to the truth of the matter.

    • Jennifer Jones on

      I agree. Closed-door sessions can facilitate a more thorough investigation without the potential for political grandstanding in a public forum.

  3. This is a complex issue with a lot of conflicting narratives. I hope both sides can engage in good faith to uncover the facts, regardless of political affiliations. A balanced and impartial investigation is crucial.

    • Michael H. Martinez on

      Absolutely. Maintaining objectivity and avoiding partisanship will be key to ensuring a credible and trustworthy outcome.

  4. James C. Jones on

    Transparency is important, but the format of the hearings should focus on gathering information effectively, not political theater. I’m curious to see what insights the closed-door interviews may uncover.

  5. Isabella Thompson on

    This is a sensitive issue that deserves a measured and impartial approach. While public hearings can promote transparency, the closed-door format may enable a more comprehensive investigation. I’m curious to see what new information emerges.

  6. Isabella Jones on

    It’s understandable that Clinton would want a public hearing, but the closed-door format may allow for more candid and detailed testimony. I hope both sides can cooperate to get to the bottom of this.

    • Patricia Jackson on

      Agreed. Maintaining an open and constructive dialogue, rather than political posturing, is crucial for a thorough and credible investigation.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.