Listen to the article
Pentagon Orders 1,500 Soldiers to Prepare for Possible Minnesota Deployment
The Pentagon has ordered approximately 1,500 active duty soldiers to prepare for potential deployment to Minnesota, where federal authorities are conducting a major immigration enforcement operation, according to two defense officials speaking on condition of anonymity.
Two infantry battalions from the Army’s 11th Airborne Division, specialized in arctic operations and based in Alaska, have received prepare-to-deploy orders. One official confirmed the troops are standing by should President Donald Trump invoke the Insurrection Act, a rarely used 19th century law that would allow him to employ active duty troops in a law enforcement capacity.
The military preparations come just days after Trump threatened to use the 1807 law to quell protests against his administration’s immigration crackdown. In a social media post on Thursday, Trump stated he would invoke the act “if the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job.”
Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell, in an emailed statement, did not deny the orders had been issued, saying only that the military “is always prepared to execute the orders of the Commander-in-Chief if called upon.”
Trump appeared to moderate his stance on Friday, telling reporters at the White House there wasn’t a reason to use the act “right now,” though he added, “If I needed it, I’d use it. It’s very powerful.”
The situation in Minnesota has become increasingly tense as federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conduct operations that have sparked protests. Demonstrators have gathered outside federal buildings, including the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis, where law enforcement has detained several protesters.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat who has frequently clashed with Trump, has publicly urged the president not to send in more troops. “I’m making a direct appeal to the President: Let’s turn the temperature down. Stop this campaign of retribution. This is not who we are,” Walz said last week on social media.
The potential deployment marks another instance of Trump threatening to use the Insurrection Act during his presidency. He previously mentioned invoking it during the 2020 protests following George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police officers and has more recently suggested using it to address immigration-related demonstrations.
The Insurrection Act grants the president authority to deploy military forces within the United States under specific circumstances, including civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. The law has been used sparingly throughout American history, with the most recent application in 1992 when President George H.W. Bush sent federal troops to Los Angeles to quell unrest following the acquittal of four white police officers in the beating of Rodney King.
Legal experts have noted that invoking the act in response to protests against immigration enforcement would represent an extraordinary and potentially controversial use of presidential power. Civil liberties organizations have already expressed concerns about the potential deployment of military personnel in a domestic law enforcement role.
The Pentagon’s readiness orders highlight the growing tension between federal immigration policies and local responses to those policies. Minnesota has become a flashpoint in the national debate over immigration enforcement under the Trump administration, with community activists arguing that aggressive ICE operations are disrupting communities and separating families.
As the situation develops, both federal and state officials continue to monitor the protests while preparing for potential escalation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


12 Comments
The potential use of the Insurrection Act raises a lot of questions about the balance between public safety and civil liberties. I’m curious to see how this plays out and what the long-term implications could be.
Whenever the military is deployed domestically, it’s important to ensure proper oversight and accountability. I hope the authorities proceed with extreme caution and restraint.
This is a complex situation that highlights the delicate balance between law enforcement and the right to protest. I’ll be following the developments closely to understand the full context.
The decision to deploy active-duty troops is a weighty one that should not be taken lightly. I hope the authorities exhaust all other options before resorting to such measures.
This situation underscores the ongoing tensions around immigration enforcement and the right to protest. I’ll be watching closely to see how the authorities navigate this delicate balance.
The potential use of the Insurrection Act is a significant escalation that could have serious repercussions. I hope the authorities explore all other options before resorting to such measures.
The potential use of the Insurrection Act is a concerning development that could have far-reaching consequences. I’m curious to learn more about the specific threats and justification for this action.
Deploying the military for domestic law enforcement is a highly contentious issue that deserves careful consideration. I hope the authorities prioritize de-escalation and respect for civil liberties.
Interesting that the military is being placed on standby for a potential deployment in Minnesota. I wonder what specific situation prompted this move and whether it will help or hinder the situation on the ground.
It’s concerning to see the use of military force being considered for a domestic law enforcement situation. I hope the authorities can find a peaceful resolution that respects civil liberties.
The invocation of the Insurrection Act is a significant step that could further escalate tensions. I’d like to see more details on the specific threats and justification for this deployment.
Deploying active-duty troops for domestic law enforcement is a major decision that should be approached with great caution. I hope the situation can be resolved through other means.