Listen to the article
Critics are questioning Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s commitment to her socialist principles after revelations that her campaign spent nearly $50,000 on luxury accommodations, upscale dining, and entertainment during a trip to Puerto Rico earlier this year.
Financial disclosures from the third quarter, covering July through September, show that the New York congresswoman’s campaign allocated over $15,000 for stays at two luxury hotels in San Juan and more than $10,500 on meals and catering services. The spending coincided with AOC’s visit to the island in August, during which she was seen attending a performance by Puerto Rican superstar Bad Bunny at his 31-show “Residency” tour at the Coliseo de Puerto Rico.
Social media videos from the trip captured contrasting moments of the congresswoman’s visit: in one, she visited a housing development to speak out against gentrification; in another, she was seen dancing in what appeared to be premium seating at the Bad Bunny concert alongside fellow Democratic Representative Nydia Velázquez.
Former White House press secretary Sean Spicer was quick to label the spending as hypocritical. “This is not new for her,” Spicer said. “Remember the dress that she wore to that famous MET Gala, where it said ‘Tax The Rich’ – it wasn’t exactly ‘off the rack,’ if you will, it was a designer dress made for her.”
Spicer extended his criticism to other members of “the Squad,” a group of progressive Democratic lawmakers, arguing they “love to rally against capitalism, but certainly don’t mind benefiting from it.”
“These people know no bounds. They love to tell everyone what they should do about their carbon footprint, and then they fly private. They love to talk about the excesses of the rich and then they benefit from it, they trade stocks, they get rich in Congress,” he added.
The Bad Bunny concert series became a cultural hotspot, drawing celebrities like LeBron James, Iggy Azalea, Penelope Cruz, and Austin Butler. The exclusive nature of the event has fueled critics’ arguments that Ocasio-Cortez’s personal lifestyle conflicts with her public messaging.
Republican political strategist Matt Gorman weighed in on the controversy, saying, “AOC wouldn’t be a proper socialist if she wasn’t irresponsibly spending someone else’s money.” He added that politicians like Ocasio-Cortez “claim to advocate for the working people, yet don’t mind treating themselves to the spoils of other people’s money.”
Florida congressional candidate Michael Carbonara was similarly critical, stating, “AOC rails nonstop against ‘the rich,’ yet drops tens of thousands in campaign cash on luxury hotels, upscale catering, and elite venues on a Puerto Rico trip. Socialism for you, first-class living for her. The hypocrisy writes itself.”
The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) summed up the conservative position by calling the expenditures “peak hypocrisy from a walking scam.”
This latest controversy highlights the ongoing tension between progressive politicians’ messaging and their personal choices. Critics argue that living an elite lifestyle while campaigning against wealth inequality undermines credibility, while supporters might contend that participating in cultural events and maintaining appropriate accommodations while traveling for work is reasonable for any public figure.
Ocasio-Cortez has faced similar criticisms before, particularly regarding her attendance at the 2021 Met Gala wearing a “Tax the Rich” dress designed by Aurora James. The congresswoman defended that appearance as an opportunity to bring her message to new audiences, though critics viewed it as contradictory to her socialist platform.
As one of the most visible progressive voices in Congress, Ocasio-Cortez’s spending habits will likely continue to face scrutiny, particularly as she maintains her position as an advocate for economic equality and opponent of wealth concentration.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
This raises some interesting questions about political branding and consistency. While I understand the desire for comfort and leisure, the optics of lavish spending may clash with AOC’s public persona and messaging. It will be important for her team to address this transparently and explain how it aligns with her values and priorities.
Agreed, the spending does seem at odds with her image as a champion of the working class. It will be important for her to reconcile this in a way that maintains her credibility.
I’m curious to hear AOC’s perspective on this. Luxury accommodations and entertainment don’t necessarily negate her commitment to progressive causes, but the contrast with her public persona is striking. Transparency and a thoughtful explanation could help resolve this issue.
A nuanced response acknowledging the concerns while defending the necessity of such expenses could help diffuse the situation. But the optics are certainly tricky and will require careful navigation.
This seems like a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. While I respect AOC’s advocacy, the lavish spending does raise questions about her consistency. Ultimately, I’d like to see a detailed accounting and rationale from her team to understand how this aligns with her principles.