Listen to the article
In a surprising twist to the ongoing private credit narrative, Bank of America has taken a bold stance against what it describes as “misinformation” plaguing the sector, particularly concerning Blue Owl, a prominent alternative asset manager that recently made headlines for freezing withdrawals from one of its retail investor funds.
The freeze, reported last week by the Financial Times, triggered fresh concerns about the stability of the private credit market. The news sent Blue Owl’s stock plummeting more than 16% over five days, as market observers drew unsettling parallels to the early warning signs of the 2007-2008 financial crisis.
Renowned economist Mohamed El-Erian described the situation as a potential “canary-in-the-coalmine” moment reminiscent of pre-Great Financial Crisis conditions. Adding to the chorus of concern, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed his own worries about the developments, indicating he is closely monitoring the situation.
Further complicating matters for Blue Owl, Business Insider reported that the company had encountered difficulties financing a data center project intended for occupation by CoreWeave, a high-performance computing provider that has gained prominence in the AI infrastructure space.
Despite these troubling signals, Bank of America’s analysts remain steadfastly optimistic about both Blue Owl and the broader private credit sector. In a note released Monday, they attributed the market’s negative reaction to widespread misunderstanding of the private credit industry’s fundamentals.
“There is a significant level of misinformation weighing on OWL and the private credit industry which has led to a particularly attractive buying opportunity for OWL,” the analysts stated. Their bullish outlook is reflected in their price target for Blue Owl stock, which implies potential upside exceeding 100% from current levels.
Bank of America outlined several factors supporting their positive stance. First, they emphasized that Blue Owl’s data center exposure represents a separate segment from its core private credit operations, suggesting that issues in one area won’t necessarily contaminate the entire business. The bank also expressed confidence in the credit quality of the software sector, where private credit has significant exposure.
Additionally, BofA pointed out that previous high-profile failures in the private credit space—specifically First Brands and Tricolor Holdings—did not precipitate widespread contagion throughout the sector as many had feared. These isolated incidents, they argue, should not be interpreted as harbingers of systemic failure.
The recent turmoil comes amid private credit’s remarkable growth over the past decade. The sector has expanded from a relatively niche alternative asset class to a significant market force with over $1.5 trillion in assets. This explosive growth has been driven by institutional investors seeking higher yields in a historically low-interest-rate environment and by borrowers attracted to the flexibility and speed offered by private lenders compared to traditional banking channels.
Critics have long questioned whether private credit represents a shadow banking system developing outside the rigorous regulatory framework governing traditional financial institutions. Concerns about valuation practices, liquidity mismatches, and concentration risks have periodically surfaced but have generally been dismissed during the sector’s boom years.
Bank of America remains committed to its positive long-term outlook for private credit that it established entering 2026. The bank’s analysts particularly highlighted the asset class’s appeal for U.S. retirees, citing “high returns, downside protection and monthly dividends.” They noted that private credit investments have outperformed many equity strategies over the previous three years.
As the situation continues to unfold, market participants find themselves at a crossroads: heed the warnings of those who see echoes of past financial crises, or embrace Bank of America’s more sanguine interpretation of recent events as market overreactions fueled by misconception rather than fundamental weakness.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
I’m curious to hear more about Bank of America’s perspective on the ‘misinformation’ surrounding private credit. What specific points are they pushing back on?
That’s a good question. It would be helpful to get more details on BofA’s specific concerns and how they view the current state of the private credit market.
I’m a bit skeptical of Bank of America’s claims of ‘misinformation’ around private credit. Seems like they may have a vested interest in downplaying concerns in that sector.
That’s a fair perspective. Banks often try to protect their own interests, so it’s important to view their statements through that lens.
The challenges Blue Owl is facing with its data center project add an interesting wrinkle to this story. I wonder if that’s symptomatic of broader liquidity issues in the alternative asset space.
A good point. The financing difficulties for that data center project could suggest broader strains that go beyond just the frozen retail fund.
I’m curious to learn more about the specific data center project that Blue Owl was having trouble financing. Could that be a canary in the coal mine for broader liquidity challenges?
That’s a good question. The financing difficulties for that project could indeed be a sign of broader liquidity issues in the alternative asset space, as you mentioned.
It’s reassuring to see Treasury Secretary Bessent closely monitoring the private credit situation. Oversight from government officials will be key to maintaining stability in that market.
Agreed. Regulatory scrutiny will be important, especially given the potential systemic risks if problems in private credit start to spill over.
The concerns about private credit stability are understandable given the Blue Owl fund freeze. It’ll be important to see how this plays out and whether it’s an isolated incident or indicative of broader issues.
Agreed. The potential ‘canary-in-the-coalmine’ comparison to the 2008 crisis is certainly concerning and bears close watching.
The private credit market has been a major growth area in recent years, so any signs of instability are concerning. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.
Absolutely. The rapid expansion of private credit, coupled with the potential for contagion, makes this a very important issue to monitor closely.
Interesting to see Bank of America push back on private credit ‘misinformation’. I wonder if they’re trying to get ahead of any potential market turbulence in that space.
You raise a good point. Banks often have a vested interest in maintaining confidence in private credit markets.